At present, the independent enrollment of national art colleges and universities is starting one after another. The reporter's investigation found that there are other art test enrollment agents in Jiangxi who paid bribes to the leaders of universities outside the province. Many teachers of Shangrao Normal University were sentenced for accepting bribes when they were entrusted by the college to recruit art students outside the province.
Recruitment agent bribed 17 art candidates to enter Hubei Academy of Fine Arts through the back door.
The reporter was informed that the Intermediate People's Court of Huangshi City, Hubei Province sentenced Liu Gang to fixed-term imprisonment of 1 1 year for accepting bribes and confiscated 200,000 yuan of property. Liu Gang's wife, Wang, was also sentenced to three years in prison and suspended for four years for accepting bribes. The reporter checked the verdict and found that Liu Gang was previously the party secretary (director level) of Hubei Academy of Fine Arts. In this case, Liu Gang was accused by the procuratorate of accepting money from the Jiangxi admissions agency and taking the back door for the Jiangxi art test candidates.
According to the court, around 2002, the wife of Liu Gang, a professor at wuhan textile University, was assigned to Jiangxi Province to enroll students locally. In the meantime, she met Jiang, an enrollment agent in Nanchang. From 2009 to 20 12, Jiang found Liu Gang through his wife to help the candidates he introduced in the enrollment of Hubei Academy of Fine Arts. With the help of Liu Gang, Hubei Academy of Fine Arts admitted 17 Jiangxi candidates. To express gratitude, Jiang gave Liu Gang's wife more than 940,000 yuan in four times. Excluding the sponsorship fee paid by Liu Gang to the school admissions office, the actual income of the couple exceeded 439,000 yuan.
According to Jiang's confession, in 20 12, seven people passed him to Hubei Academy of Fine Arts and gave them to Liu Gang's wife Wang at the standard of 60,000 yuan each.
Bribery 1.5 million yuan Five candidates were admitted to Anhui Finance College.
In the interview, the reporter found that in the bribery case of Shi Xiangqiang, vice president of the School of Literature and Media of Anhui University of Finance, Art Candidates, Jiangxi Province was involved.
It was found by the court that the defendant Shi Xiangqiang took advantage of his position during the period of 20 10 to accept the entrustment of Wang, the principal of a cultural and art school in Nanchang City, Jiangxi Province, to provide care for the relevant candidates in the process of marking and grading the entrance examination, and received 6,543,805 yuan from Wang.
"In the second half of 2009, I passed by Bengbu and found Shi Xiangqiang, telling him that some students wanted to take the Anhui Finance College, hoping to help the candidates achieve the purpose of taking the exam through him, and proposed to give 30,000 yuan for each candidate admitted." Wang confirmed to the case-handling unit that in February and March of 20 10, he found Shi Xiangqiang with photos of five candidates' art test works in Jiangxi Province, and took out a paper bag from his suitcase during dinner, which contained150,000 yuan in cash and handed it to Shi Xiangqiang. April 20 10, the examination results came out, and all five candidates were admitted to Anhui University of Finance.
A year later, on 20 1 1 year, Wang, the principal of this cultural and art school in Nanchang, found Shi Xiangqiang again and gave him150,000 yuan at the price of 30,000 yuan per candidate. Later, because only three students passed the exam, Teacher Liu returned 60,000 yuan to Wang. Later, Wang remitted another 30,000 yuan to Mr. Liu, because he found that he had missed a qualified candidate, but the money was left by Mr. Liu alone.
The reporter learned that in addition to college leaders outside the province using the art test to enroll students and accepting money from Jiangxi art test agents or parents, there are also college teachers in Jiangxi who use the art test interview as judges and accept money from others.
Among the many bribery cases tried by the Xinzhou District Court in Shangrao City, many teachers of Shangrao Normal University were involved in accepting bribes during the art entrance examination. For example, in the bribery case of Zheng, Zheng is an associate professor at the School of Music and Dance of Shangrao Normal University. I accepted the benefits of my parents when I was appointed as an interview judge of Lanzhou Art Examination in Gansu by Shangrao Teachers College. "Accepting a bribe of 78,000 yuan from others has violated the criminal law and constitutes a crime of accepting bribes." The verdict found that Zheng was sentenced to three years in prison for accepting bribes, suspended for three years, and confiscated property of 6,543,800 yuan.
Wang, a lecturer in the Music and Dance College of Shangrao Teachers College from 2006 to the time of the crime, was appointed by the Admissions and Employment Office of Shangrao Teachers College as an interviewer for the art college entrance examination in Lanzhou City, Gansu Province on April 20, taking bribes of 1 17000 yuan, with a personal profit of 53000 yuan. The Xinzhou District Court of Shangrao City sentenced Wang to eight months' imprisonment, suspended.
According to the information in the judgment, the reporter found that there are other teachers in Shangrao Normal University who accept bribes from art test training institutions or parents of candidates when they are appointed by the college to recruit students from other provinces, so that candidates can pass the exam smoothly. Ru Xiang, master's degree, has been a lecturer in the School of Music and Dance of Shangrao Normal University from August 2007 to before the incident. During the period from 20 10 to 20 14, Xiang was appointed by the Admissions and Employment Office of Shangrao Normal University to go to Lanzhou, Gansu and other places as an interview examiner for the fine arts college entrance examination, and accepted bribes 2 13700.
How to prevent corruption in art examination and select talents fairly?
In recent years, Jiangxi, Guangdong, Anhui, Gansu and other places have implemented a number of reform measures for art recruitment, formulated relatively unified standards and strengthened the supervision of test sites, and achieved certain results. For example, it is stipulated in our province that the written test subjects must be independently reviewed and comprehensively evaluated by more than 2 people, and the interview subjects such as performances and performances must be reviewed and comprehensively evaluated by an expert group composed of more than 5 people (not less than 3 people for solfeggio and model singing). The content of professional interview examination must be recorded and recorded by the unified examination center.
Yi Shenghua, director of the criminal department of Beijing Yingke Law Firm, believes that there are great subjective factors in the selection of art examinations. Compared with the general college entrance examination, the scores of art examination courses are influenced by the examiner's subjective aesthetic and personality judgment, and it is often difficult to identify corrupt behavior.
Then, how can we not only embody the eclecticism of artistic talents, but also ensure the fairness and justice of enrollment? Chu et al., a researcher at the Chinese Academy of Educational Sciences, suggested: First, break the dual identity of the person in charge of the art test and the over-centralized enrollment power. Professors of specialized courses shall not concurrently serve as evaluators of specialized tests, and establish a professional independent third-party evaluation mechanism and a scientific and reasonable evaluation system design; Second, openness and transparency, video recording of the whole examination, computer monitoring of the whole examination, unblocking all kinds of channels for reporting and complaining, and establishing a traceability system; The third is to cut off the interest chain of the training course, and strictly stipulate that examiners shall not organize and participate in any form of pre-test counseling and training, so as to increase the illegal cost, and offenders will be investigated for legal responsibility.