Art study abroad is packaged by major combined institutions. Maybe no one has thought about the reason. The reason is actually simple:
1. Relationship: Invite professors from Rhode Island, St. Martin and Parsons to hold workshops and seminars in China, which proves that our institution cooperates with major universities and reminds customers whether these institutions will have green channels to ensure your academic performance.
2. Grade: From the packaging of official website, the decoration of teaching space to the design of a whole set of visual VI, almost all institutions are trying their best to create their own high-end positioning. The reason can be summed up as a logic: because of the high-end, the teaching staff is guaranteed, so the tuition is high, so welcome new people, you can rest assured. But is there a necessary connection between packaging and teaching?
A company in the industry, without naming names, has a turnover of 30 million, of which only 6 million is paid to baidu promotion (there are other promotion forms, so I won't go into details). What other ways can they keep customers' attention without relying on packaging?
This is the infinite cycle of most combined organizations: the promotion fee increases sharply → enterprises add packaging investment → teachers' investment decreases → excellent teachers are unsustainable → students' reputation is poor → promotion fees are added to recruit new students.
Education and business have always been two different things. If you rely on business logic to operate education, following the above logic will inevitably intensify the situation, which will not only ruin the benign format of combined training, but also ruin your future of studying abroad.