Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Education and training - Significance of measurement and test system
Significance of measurement and test system
GB/T19022-2003 IDISO10012: 2003 "Requirements of Measurement Management System for Measuring Process and Measuring Equipment" (hereinafter referred to as the new standard) is new to the top managers and authorized managers with measuring functions in the process of establishing, implementing, maintaining and continuously improving the measurement and test system. Clearly stipulated. This will greatly promote the establishment, implementation and continuous improvement of the measurement and testing system according to the new standards, and provide organizational guarantee for the establishment, implementation and continuous improvement of the measurement and testing system.

In the process of implementing the new standard, enterprise leaders should attach great importance to measurement work, and set up a measurement management committee composed of leaders of companies, workshops and relevant functional departments at all levels to strengthen management from top to bottom and strengthen the unified management of enterprise measurement work. The general manager and the deputy general manager in charge always participate in the decision-making of key issues in the formulation and implementation of the plan, care for, arrange and inspect the work, often negotiate with various departments to solve problems arising in the implementation process, negotiate the horizontal relationship between various departments, persist in propaganda, implementation and rectification, and provide protection in terms of people, money and materials. The leaders of all departments actively supported and cooperated, and carried out their work in strict accordance with the requirements. With the attention and participation of leaders at all levels, the system works smoothly. 1. Explain the importance and necessity of improving the enterprise measurement and testing system.

With the wide application of automation control technology in enterprise production process and the improvement of automation control level, the dependence of production operation control on measurement is further strengthened. The realization of automatic control of production equipment weakens people's ability to control the operation of production equipment in the normal production process, so it requires higher accuracy and repeatability of measurement and control equipment and higher requirements for measurement data. This also requires enterprises to strengthen the management and effective monitoring of measuring equipment and measuring process. The measurement and test system based on data management, measurement equipment management and measurement process control is established, which provides good management and control means for it. Therefore, improving the management level of plan control is the premise of lean production, the standard to measure the management technical level of an enterprise, and an important means to ensure high quality, low consumption, safety and environmental protection, and to obtain good benefits and reputation.

2. Strengthen backbone training.

ISO 100 12 is the only technical standard in the ISO9000 series. According to this standard and JJF1KLOC-0/65438-2003 Confirmation Standard for Measurement and Testing System issued by AQSIQ, the measurement and testing system is an important part of enterprise integrated management system. The management, especially the ISO certification team, is required to thoroughly understand the content, essence and specific practices of the standard, mobilize the operational level when necessary, and take advantage of various opportunities to consult experts and learn from brother units. Through these studies and exchanges, they can gradually understand and understand the connotation of the standard and achieve the purpose of guiding the next work.

3. Increase publicity.

The competent leaders and surveyors of the unit attend the mobilization meeting of standard publicity and implementation, explain the standards, and require publicity and implementation among the personnel of the unit. Publicize the standards one by one at the meeting of the planning control center, so that employees can gradually deepen their understanding and understanding of the standards. After the company's measurement and testing system documents are compiled, it will organize publicity again, focusing on the management procedures formulated by the company and listing the distribution table of measurement functions of various departments, so that every leader and backbone engaged in measurement work can understand the contents and requirements of the documents. The plan control center also publicized the new standards, specifications and company system documents in the form of blackboard newspaper, which laid a good foundation for the next concrete implementation. The standard O 100 12 clearly requires that an effective system must be established and documented when implementing the standard. According to the actual situation of our company, it is the purpose of establishing measurement and test system for enterprises to establish a feasible document system. According to this purpose, combined with the requirements of standards and specifications, a measurement and testing system documentation team including measurement administrators and related engineering and technical personnel is established. Because the document will be implemented in the company as a "regulation" after it is formed, the level of document preparation is directly related to the quality of implementation. It is the key to improve the measurement and test system to compile documents that not only meet the standard requirements, but also improve the overall management level through efforts. Therefore, the system documents should be revised repeatedly before release, and relevant experts can be consulted to ask them to put forward improvement suggestions for the problems existing in the compilation of measurement and test system documents. The implementation of the new standard should focus on the following work:

(1) Establish measurable quality objectives. This is an important difference between the revised ISO/KOOC-0/00/KOOC-0/2: 2003 standard and ISO/KOOC-0/00/KOOC-0/2-/KOOC-0/:/KOOC-0/992 standard. According to the current situation of measurement work in this unit, through identification and analysis, the overall goal of an appropriate measurement and testing system is formulated, and it is decomposed into relevant departments according to the standard requirements and implemented layer by layer.

(2) Deepen the implementation of management review and set clear objectives and tasks. Management review is an important measure for enterprises to establish self-improvement mechanism. The general manager personally presided over the management review, summarized and resolved the suitability, effectiveness and adequacy of the company's measurement and test system, discussed, studied, verified and analyzed the quality objectives and decomposition of the company's measurement and test system, the determination of key measurement processes and the measurement responsibilities of various departments, and appointed representatives of measurement managers, which really played the due role in the management review.

(3) The management manual of measurement and test system and the program file of measurement and test system are compiled.

(4) Select and determine the key measurement processes of the company's existing production devices and products, and evaluate the uncertainty of these key measurement processes.

(5) Revise the measurement calibration method. The "management responsibility" in ISO 100 12: 2003 is a new clause compared with the original standard. In ISO/KOOC-0/00/KOOC-0/2-/KOOC-0/and ISO/KOOC-0/00/KOOC-0/2-2, "management responsibilities" are not specifically listed as separate requirements. It can be seen that international standards pay special attention to the establishment of measurement institutions, and senior leaders should attach importance to and support measurement work and improve the role and status of measurement functional departments.

It is necessary to combine the actual situation of enterprises, consider the hierarchy of measurement work and the effectiveness of management, and seek a reasonable management model. Therefore, enterprises should further strengthen the classification management responsibility system of measurement work. First of all, the position and function of the measurement and control center in the process of implementing ISO 100 12: 2003 standard should be clarified, and the positions and responsibilities of departments and personnel at all levels should be determined according to the requirements of relevant provisions of the standard and the specific situation of the unit, and the implementation should be organized after approval by the general manager. The measurement work of the whole company is responsible and managed by the company and workshop (department) at different levels. Responsibilities and authority are specified in the form of Distribution Table of Surveying Functions and Job Responsibilities of Surveyors. The measurement department focuses on company-level measurement, and the production and equipment workshops (departments) should manage and maintain the materials and energy measuring instruments at all levels in the factory, focusing on device measurement. All units should improve the measurement management network according to the requirements of the document, and adopt the management method of linking the quality of measurement work with the economic assessment responsibility system. Who is responsible for the metering accident? The responsibility is clear and the responsibility lies with people. Make the division of labor between the measurement and control center and other functional departments clear and scientific, unify power and responsibility, and ensure the smooth implementation of the measurement and testing system.

In order to improve the management system of measurement and testing system, enterprises should start with improving the work of measurement points, organize internal auditors to conduct internal audits of various departments, feed back unqualified items to relevant departments, require rectification within a time limit, and appoint internal auditors to track and verify the rectification; Through the process of inspection, supervision, investigation and service guidance, provide guidance and technical support for the measurement work of various departments. Through the improvement of metering point, the saving benefit is obvious. At the same time, enterprises should further pay close attention to the dynamic management of the whole process of measuring equipment, formulate the dynamic management system of the whole process of measuring equipment, and clarify the monitoring of measuring equipment from design, point selection, selection, acceptance, warehousing, verification/calibration, use, circulation, maintenance and scrapping. Each secondary unit uses microcomputer and CMMS software to dynamically manage measuring equipment. The enterprise planning control center strengthens communication with design, maneuvering, planning, purchasing and other departments, and controls the purchase of spare parts, scrapping and updating, technical transformation and other measuring equipment, which plays a positive role in ensuring the high cost performance of newly purchased measuring equipment.

Facts have proved that in order to participate in market competition and intensive production, enterprises must improve the level of measurement and testing, strengthen measurement management, improve the measurement and testing system, control production and guide operation with accurate and reliable measurement data, and take doing measurement well as the conscious pursuit of enterprises, so as to promote economic growth and make enterprises achieve better benefits.

According to jjg1001-1991,verification is all the work to evaluate the measurement characteristics of measuring instruments and determine whether they meet the legal requirements. Calibration is a set of operations to determine the indication error of measuring instruments under specified conditions. These two definitions are consistent with or similar to the relevant international definitions. Please refer to the table below to understand their differences and comparisons.

Verification and calibration of serial number items

The effectiveness of 1 is legal, the government's law enforcement behavior is illegal, and the technical behavior of enterprises.

According to the verification regulations, there are three kinds of calibration specifications: countries, regions and departments, and they can also be formulated by relevant departments, countries, regions, departments and enterprises.

The content comprehensively determines the measurement characteristics, and the qualification only determines the indication error, not the qualification.

4 Whether the certificate is qualified: verification certificate (qualification grade calibration certificate, giving error value and calibration uncertainty, etc.)

Unqualified: notification of verification result

5 background legal measurement requirements, technical measurement requirements are mostly used in the planned economy system, mostly used in the market economy system.

6 Uncertainty should be considered according to the allowable error limit stipulated in the regulations, and uncertainty should be considered according to the calibration uncertainty, and the value should be indicated in the general specification.