First of all, I have to thank two college students, only JD. Without their reminder, I would have missed the journey of arrow card that brought me such good memories (I applied for the sales trainee of Shenzhen Wrigley, and the interview was held at Guangzhou headquarters). From the online application to the end, I have accumulated a lot to share with you. I really started the code word, but I don't know where to start. I come from the School of Economics of Shenzhen University, majoring in accounting. Not 2 1 1, not 985, but I am very proud of my school. I think these names posted outside a school are far less important than the process of cultivating students themselves, but Shenda really passes on the spirit and tradition of Shenda to every student. That is beside the point.
Let's talk about online application first. This year, Wrigley's online application system for sales trainees has no worries in the future. I like this system very much, and I think it can highlight my rich student work experience. Ha ha. Four agents are torturing me. I can't be weak in English. Many comrades have fallen into the online application. The current online application pass rate is 100%. Should online application of enterprises be a keyword search? Especially in such a large number. Try to highlight your different experiences in the online application system and cover a wider range of resumes. I don't think any harsh retrieval system should be missed. The written test is in the headquarters of South China University of Technology. Let's divide it into two scenes. I am in the second scene. There are so many people. It's really a sea pen. Total ***60 minutes, 25 lines of questions, 4 readings, each with 3 small questions. Personally, I feel quite tight. If you are good at English, you can spend 15 minutes to do 4 readings first. My English is really poor. Start with the line test honestly, because there are still some public exams to review, so the line test is the basic strength. After reading it in a down-to-earth manner, I was very surprised to find that there were only 10 minutes left. It is obviously impossible for me to read it four times, not to mention that I haven't stamped my card yet. So I started juggling.
This is an eye patch. On the one hand, there is no leading group discussion, and I am not a novice. Share some experiences and skills with you. I think the supreme skill is to express your views in a low-key and restrained way. The interview is one-off for everyone. Under the premise of uncertainty, my principle is never to be a leader. Although it is often a project PM, it is very utilitarian, and it is too easy for leaders to have mixed feelings. Being a good consultant is my goal in every group discussion. In this process, never quarreling, making more compromises without affecting the overall situation, and being deadlocked in group discussions are my best performance moments, which run through my group discussions. In addition, I'll tell you one of my tips. Take notes. This requires a high ability to refine and summarize. In the process of discussion, we should record the opinions that everyone agrees with and sort them into 1, 2, 3 points. When we need to reach an agreement at the end, we can usually get undisturbed speaking time. After the speech, because time is running out, I rarely refute it, and then pass this note to the leader as a reference for the conclusion. This move is vicious, so let's figure it out for ourselves! Ha ha. Remember, without leading group HR discussion, the most important thing is not how perfect the discussion result is, but the process determines success or failure! The group must explore the criteria and principles for getting the answer! Wrigley is a group of 6 people, with 25 minutes for discussion and 5 minutes for presentation, and members can supplement it. The atmosphere in our group is very harmonious, so we should abide by the rules. Personally, I did do it in a low-key and restrained way, but I think it's a bit too much. I looked back and forth, and many opinions were not fully expressed. It's a pity to come out, but it seems that my group finally passed me. One person later lost contact, I wonder if he has passed. I hope we can all find jobs we like.
Both sides are one-on-one with HR (Wrigley calls it PLD). Mainly ask some personal experience questions for the online application resume. Although I was very carefully prepared to be picked up and stress interview, I was really there, and my embarrassment may only be known by that beautiful woman HR at that time. I usually think I can speak better, but my language ability and IQ are seriously degraded under crazy questioning. I was really disheartened. Tell future generations to be fully prepared. Maybe you didn't have a chance to say what you wanted to say, and all you were asked were unprepared. Mentality is really important. I think the drama at that time was also related to the flood of gains and losses, and the whole person's state was very tight. The final questioning session must be well prepared. I really think I can pass. It is likely that the final questioning session will pay more attention to the sales training program and the attitude shown in this job. After this round, I really didn't expect to receive a notice about my future. When I went back to Shenzhen University to have a snack with my classmates, I still remember it was a dark Friday night. As soon as I saw the flashing screen, I suddenly had a hunch that Wrigley gave me another chance to perform.
So, I once again appeared in the headquarters of Wrigley China-Guangzhou R&F Center. When reporting on three sides, it is obvious that the crowd is not as good as one or two sides. Entering this round, I believe everyone is prepared, capable and lucky, such as me. The form of three parties is group competition, and four groups compete in the same field. This year's theme is shelving. There are 6 people in each group, including two China universities, two Jinan universities, a South China University of Technology and me. Here's the title. Give a certain number of Wrigley products and a shelf according to certain standards (the kind that is common in checkout counters) (our topic has several standards: new products must reach 6 exhibition areas, varieties should be diversified, and the profit margin of products on the shelf should be as large as possible, etc. ). Discuss for 20 minutes, put aside for 5 minutes, and show the whole group for 5 minutes (everyone has to speak). Human resources and sales managers. Add up to 10, just wandering in the group, please ignore it. I don't think it is necessary to emphasize the principle of teamwork. But there are two strong girls in the same group, and I couldn't get a word in the first ten minutes. There is also a boy from South China University of Technology who keeps sighing and shaking his head. I am basically helpless, but opportunities often flash at the most lost time, depending on whether I can grasp them. In the discussion about swallowing saliva, I interjected: How many products do we have? Only by considering the quantity of products can our discussion be meaningful. The group discussion continued under my words, and soon we came up with a unified plan. After 5 minutes of placement and HR statistics. The beauty of our group's display is unsightly, and the display standard is not up to standard, but our display profit is the highest, and it far exceeds other groups and won the first place, although the discussion process is very chaotic. First sum up as the first group. Two slightly stronger girls, one speaks at the beginning and the other makes a concluding speech. In the summary session, I briefly said that what we did was not up to standard, about 20 seconds. I feel that my performance today is average, and it is always good to give more opportunities to my teammates. After summing up, HR and the sales manager began to ask questions. Questioning is a link that I think will change my destiny. I'm too low-key and reserved today. I said no more than five or six sentences, so I didn't impress the interviewer. I didn't expect an interviewer to throw the question to my classmate X for the first time. The discussion lasted about 10 minutes, and you said a sentence (the one emphasized above). What did you think at that time, and what role and influence did it have on the group? I answered two points gracefully. He smiled at me and nodded. I secretly relieved. He turned to another girl (not the two stronger ones) to discuss whether there is an obvious leader in your group. If so, who is it? If not, what do you think is the impact? She gave a negative answer. He turned to a strong girl again. The problem is very sharp. According to my observation, the whole group discussion is basically up to you. Obviously, you want to play the role of leader, but your team members disagree. what do you think? After the girl answered. He turned to the girl in front. If you were asked to support a leader, who would you support? I really appreciate that girl's support and affirmation. She even mentioned me. T.t., I said less than seven sentences. Visible strength really can't bring any good results. If you can't hold it, it will be a pity. At that time, I felt that all directions were waving to me. Finally, the three of us together received the notice that night.
The other two ended last week. I was scheduled for today,165438+1October 23rd. Four sides are similar to two sides, and the interviewer is replaced by a manager in charge of Dongguan, Huizhou and Shenzhen. What a beautiful woman! The shadow on the second side is too big for me. I did a lot of homework this week. Today, the beauty manager said that the first half of the interview was very agile, and the second half was too relaxed, which was suspected of desertion. God, there is such a big contrast between the two sides. However, I have tried my best to play, and I will try my best to leave it to fate, depending on whether there is fate or not. The four-sided process is not much to say. Be yourself! From past experience, there are also many problems. I also mixed in some information when I prepared in advance, covering some information about Wrigley and my own understanding of sales work. Including the final questioning session, as a layman in sales, I also put forward some small problems in the process of cramming knowledge during this period. The manager also described Wrigley and some situations and future development directions of the industry to me. I'm glad it's over (not surprisingly, it should be over). After shaking hands with the manager, I felt a rare relaxation during this time.
After the whole online written test, I completely felt Wrigley's excellent corporate culture. Wrigley people's concern and care for us in the workplace reserve is humanistic spirit, trust, dignity and respect! I sincerely hope that I am destined to work in Wrigley and look forward to providing it. Comrades who have not finished the interview or are preparing for other interviews! Come on ~ ~ ! !
;