First of all, we must determine the identity, whether the lecturer is from a training institution or a group, that is, who signed the labor contract with and where he works full-time if he did not sign the labor contract. This is the most critical.

If he is a lecturer in a training institution, he is appointed as the manager and director of the group, which means that the group is a customer of the training institution or lecturer, and they have a cooperative relationship and are appointed as consultants, project-based or part-time lecturers.

If the group manager or director, with the consent of the boss of the group headquarters and the human resources department, cooperates with the training institution for a certain purpose and benefit, and becomes a contracted lecturer of the training institution, it can make sense without affecting the work.

Secondly, in our training industry, this situation is normal, and we all need different labels to increase our gold content. Often a trainer, in his personal profile, will have a training institution to sign a lecturer in the words of a group manager. This gives students a kind of trust.

Finally, I want to say that there is no conflict between trainers and company employment. Not only can the label be affixed in this way, but the actual work can also be carried out at the same time. The sales director can be a sales trainer, the human resources manager can be an HR lecturer, and he can be a lecturer in different identities, which is beneficial to himself and the company. I, Li Xinhai, in my original book "Thinking of Trainers", listed the benefits of letting trainers give lectures outside.

So, friends who want to see this answer, you can also go to the trainer and try to embark on this road. If there is anything you don't understand in the process, you can read my article more, and you will definitely understand it.