1, coherent
It is to ask candidates to be organized and structured in the process of forming answers. Clarity can be reflected in two aspects. One is logical thinking, which answers in the order of total score-total score or total score-total score according to the specific situation to reflect the order. Secondly, in terms of language, we can appropriately quote some words that can reflect the order: first, second, third, last, first, second, ... on the one hand, on the other hand, direct, indirect, fundamental, subjective and objective.
2. Clear vision
It means that candidates should clearly state what they support and oppose, and should not be ambiguous. The views are not clear, mainly as follows: first, there is a lack of clear views on the evaluation of the problem; Second, there is a lack of analysis of the nature, main manifestations, causes, effects, consequences and the necessity of solving problems, such as listing the manifestations of problems instead of defining them, and replacing the induction of problems with concrete manifestations of problems; Third, there is no clear understanding and clear expression of the cause, influence and consequence of the problem and why the problem should be solved.
It should be noted that a correct viewpoint is the premise of a clear viewpoint, and it is useless to clarify an incorrect viewpoint. Candidates should fully contact the given material, grasp the essence through phenomena on the basis of macro-understanding the background of the material, and then get the substantive point of view to be expressed by the given material, which is "for my use" in the answer.
3. Reasonable analysis
To make the analysis reasonable, we need to grasp the following three points: first, find the correct and complete analysis object; Second, it should be reasonable and logical; Third, we should combine the materials and don't make subjective assumptions.
Extended data:
In 2020, the thinking of answering the comprehensive analysis questions of Lincang Province's application is as follows:
1, explanatory comprehensive analysis
It may be to explain a sentence or a phrase. The answer is as follows:
① Explain the interviewee; ② Multi-angle analysis; ③ Put forward countermeasures.
Explaining the answer object does not need to explain every word. There are the following situations: (1) Explain abstract words, such as: borrowing people's "wisdom" and creating "wisdom"; (2) If the answer is multiple sentences, it is necessary to analyze the relationship between the sentences. For example, the "wisdom" of borrowing people and the "wisdom" of creation are obviously two sentences, and what kind of relationship between them should be made clear; (3) If the respondents have a clear meaning, highly summarize the core content of the materials, such as: in a sense, those intangible intangible cultural heritages are more important wealth than the Great Wall and the Forbidden City.
2. Critical comprehensive analysis
You don't need to explain the respondent, but you should express your views or opinions on the respondent. The answer is as follows:
(1) comments; ② Multi-angle analysis; ③ Put forward countermeasures.
However, it should be noted that you don't want to know "what do you think" but "what do the questioner think" when you make a clear point, so you can follow two methods when you put forward your point of view. One is to judge right and wrong, and to judge the obvious tendency of materials; The other is value judgment, which highly summarizes the core content of the material.