Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Education and training - Language rehabilitation institutions abuse deaf children. What's wrong with the incident response?
Language rehabilitation institutions abuse deaf children. What's wrong with the incident response?
Nanchang hope speech rehabilitation language training department rehabilitation institutions, expensive, treatment is mostly two or three-year-old deaf children. A recently exposed video shows that many teachers slap children or hit people with wooden sticks, and children without language skills can only scream and express their pain and dissatisfaction. The person in charge of the rehabilitation institution argued that the above situation is only an individual phenomenon, and individual teachers are out of control and making mistakes, and they are rectifying and installing cameras. The Nanchang Disabled Persons' Federation, the competent department, said that an investigation team has been set up with relevant units to sincerely apologize to the injured children and their parents, as well as all sectors of society and the public concerned about this matter!

Rehabilitation training for disabled children is a warm-hearted cause with the nature of public welfare. However, when we saw the video of teachers beating and abusing deaf-mute children, we felt as bad as those abused children. It is true that the teachers involved, the heads of rehabilitation institutions and local disabled persons' federations all have responsibilities, and they should bear the consequences for their negligence. However, in addition to accountability, we must also reflect on how to make up for it.

Out of concern for deaf-mute children, the state entrusts local disabled persons' federations to screen qualified language rehabilitation institutions, and then bears part of the rehabilitation expenses. In other words, the state and parents of disabled children bear the cost of rehabilitation services. Since Nanchang Disabled Persons' Federation has chosen the language training department that hopes for speech rehabilitation, it should perform certain supervision to ensure that disabled children are not abused. The cruel reality is that if the reporter didn't go undercover as a teacher in this training institution, we might never know the inside story of the abuse of these deaf-mute children. So, has the local Disabled Persons' Federation fulfilled its supervisory responsibility? Don't say the answer, I think everyone will understand.

Obviously, if there is no mature and effective supervision mechanism, or the existing supervision mechanism fails, it is impossible for training institutions to ensure that deaf children are not infringed by teachers' inherent professional ethics. There are still many speech rehabilitation in the country, and other provinces and cities have not been exposed. Are deaf-mute children not abused? I'm afraid no one dares to give a clear answer. Deaf-mute children have no language skills, and they can't stand the grievances of their families when they are abused. Coupled with the low living ability of disabled children, if the rehabilitation teacher lacks love, patience and perseverance, it is easy to vent his inner anxiety on these poor children. Therefore, if the competent authorities do not fulfill their supervisory responsibilities, these children are likely to be abused.

The local Disabled Persons' Federation has apologized and set up an investigation team with relevant units, and it is necessary to carry out a series of aftermath and accountability, which should be done. But we should also reflect on the internal causes of things, learn lessons, and avoid abusing disabled children and repeating the same mistakes. Since local disabled persons' federations undertake the function of purchasing services, it is necessary to establish and improve the supervision mechanism for these rehabilitation institutions. For example, training teachers should be strictly controlled, such as installing monitoring in classrooms and training rooms of rehabilitation institutions, such as taking measures to let children evaluate teachers, and so on.

In a word, those who neglect their duties must be held accountable, the injured hearts of deaf-mute children need to be repaired, and the supervision of disability by rehabilitation institutions should also be repaired. Otherwise, what can we do to carry out the slogan of caring for disabled children?