The reason is that these will affect the teacher's energy. Everyone's energy is limited. If you set aside a part to engage in other sideline businesses, you will spend less energy on teaching, which will definitely affect your child's grades.
Secondly, I am worried that teachers will use their professional convenience to obtain students for counseling institutions, which will cause some unnecessary contradictions. The teacher asked so-and-so to go to the counseling institution. Are you going or not? If you don't go, will there be any teachers who have opinions?
Third, after-school tutoring makes children lose their holidays and increase their burden.
For various reasons, teachers are ordered to stop the opportunity to develop a second career. Teachers are brilliant, but they have nowhere to put them to use.
In fact, teachers' sense of responsibility will not increase because they go to counseling institutions or not. Many teachers, no matter how many things, will treat their work with heart.
If the teacher's salary is high enough and the treatment is good enough, which teacher will give up a relaxing holiday and choose to go to a counseling institution?
It is said that if the teacher's guidance is restricted, the burden can be reduced for children. Has the child really reduced the burden? After-school tuition fees have soared, and the number of children who go to cram schools has only increased, but the teaching effect is not optimistic. However, who can blame this?
At present, what we stipulate is that in-service teachers in primary and secondary schools cannot make up lessons with compensation. If in-service primary and secondary school teachers want to invest in training institutions, of course, they can, but they can't be legal representatives inside, they can be shareholders, which is allowed as a kind of financial management.
If he wants to use his status as an on-the-job teacher to recruit students, or even guide students from his school to attend training in the educational institutions he invests in, there may be problems.
At present, many famous teachers in first-tier cities leave their jobs to be full-time teachers in training institutions, or start their own training institutions, so if you are interested in education and training, or you are optimistic about the education and training market, you can boldly leave your job and start training institutions, and you can also get better returns with your professional knowledge.