In order to comprehensively strengthen the management of teaching quality, improve the quality of teachers' morality and the level of teaching and scientific research, and scientifically and fairly evaluate teachers' teaching quality. Implement the central position of teaching work, strengthen the management of teaching process, further guide and mobilize teachers' enthusiasm and improve teachers? Level five? Incremental growth mechanism to promote the overall improvement of personnel training quality. According to the "People's Republic of China (PRC) Teachers Law", "Interim Provisions on Staff Assessment of Public Institutions in Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security" and other documents, combined with the implementation plan of performance salary distribution and other rules and regulations of the college, these measures are formulated.
I. Evaluation principles
1, scientific and testable principles. Following the teaching rules of higher vocational education and the characteristics of teachers' work, the content of teachers' teaching quality assessment reflects the objective situation of teachers' teaching and teaching research performance, and the indicators have accurate meaning and quantitative standards. Follow? Subordinate department assessment, service target assessment? Ways to improve the comprehensiveness and credibility of assessment.
2. The principles of objectivity, openness and fairness. Based on the evaluation index system of teachers' teaching quality, departments (departments) participate in the evaluation process and disclose the evaluation results, which has clear guidance. Make every teacher know fairly well, reflect the difference between doing and not doing, and encourage teachers to love their jobs, be a model, and be positive and pragmatic.
3. The principle of combining quantification with performance. Based on the basic workload, teachers' teaching quality is evaluated from teaching tasks, teaching effects and other aspects, and a quantitative index system covering all elements of teachers' teaching quality is established to improve the reliability, comparability and operability of the evaluation results.
4. The principle of combining process evaluation with result evaluation. Incorporate the results of daily teaching inspection, final teaching inspection, student evaluation, peer evaluation, leadership evaluation and college supervision evaluation at the department (department) level into the evaluation system. Combine the daily process assessment with the final and final result assessment.
Second, the evaluation object and evaluation cycle
1. The assessment objects are full-time teachers, part-time teachers on campus and part-time teachers off campus.
2. The evaluation of teachers' teaching quality takes the school year as the cycle, and the evaluation result of teachers' teaching quality in the school year is the arithmetic average of the evaluation results of two semesters.
Third, the assessment content and evaluation
There are eight items in the evaluation of teachers' teaching quality, namely: teachers' morality and style; Classroom teaching workload; Other teaching workload; Teaching and research; Instruct students to win prizes in competitions, and instruct teachers to win prizes in competitions; Four evaluations of teaching; Teaching effect; Discipline attendance.
(1) Teachers' morality (3 points for each subject, *** 15 points)
1, firm in direction and law-abiding. Love the motherland, support the party's leadership, and strictly implement the party's educational policy. I will abide by People's Republic of China (PRC) Higher Vocational Education Law, People's Republic of China (PRC) Teachers Law and other laws and regulations, and consciously abide by the rules and regulations of the college.
2, seeking truth from facts, rigorous scholarship. Practice? Virtuous, knowledgeable, rigorous and good at teaching? Teaching style, training? Prudent thinking, unity of knowledge and action, pursuit of truth and bold innovation? Scientific spirit, abide by academic norms, and put an end to fraud. Constantly concentrate on studying professional industry (enterprise) standards, boldly explore, reform and innovate, so that teaching courses, teaching methods and scientific research work can constantly meet the needs of industries and occupations, and cultivate excellent professional skills talents. Obey the work arrangement of the department (department) and complete the education and teaching tasks with good quality and quantity.
3, be a teacher by example, teach and educate people. Set an example and become a model for students to abide by the law. Concentrate on practice, match words with deeds, and be consistent in appearance, cultivate students' healthy sentiments and cultivate students' good conduct and professional ethics. Love students, care about students' study and physical and mental health, understand students, respect students' personality and personality development, be strict with yourself, and be students' mentor and friend. Follow the rules of vocational education, be persuasive, be tireless in teaching others, and teach students in accordance with their aptitude; Pay attention to the coordinated development of students' knowledge, skills and quality; Cultivate students' good conduct and professional ethics and promote their all-round development.
4. Modesty, solidarity and mutual assistance. Respect each other, care for each other, treat each other sincerely, unite with each other, support each other, be a ladder, and form a professional construction team and an education and teaching team in harmony.
5, dignified appearance, civilized speech. Dress appropriately, don't wear fancy clothes, don't wear national costumes at school, and don't wear clothes that highlight personality; Speak in a civilized way, don't attack students and colleagues with ugly words, and don't vilify students and colleagues with vulgar language, thus forming a good fashion of civilized scholarship and civilized education.
At the end of each semester, each department (department) teachers' teaching quality evaluation leading group is responsible for evaluating the teachers' morality and style in this department.
(B) the workload of classroom teaching
1, classroom teaching. Teachers undertake the classroom teaching tasks assigned by the college every semester and complete the teaching tasks for one semester as required. Each commitment 1 class hour, 2 points per semester.
2. Multi-courses and combined courses. Teachers undertake more than 1 courses, and each additional class leader is counted as 1 class hour per week. If there are more than 60 students in the same class, the class weight coefficient is1.4; The weighting coefficient of class hours for more than 80 students is1.5; The weighting coefficient of 1.20 is1.7; The class weight coefficient of classes with less than 20 students is 0.8.
3. The weight coefficient of part-time teachers is 1.
(3) Other teaching workload
1. The teacher's application is reviewed by the department and approved by the Academic Affairs Office and the Youth League Committee to guide students' skills training, clubs, second class, innovation and entrepreneurial activities. More than 30 people per week, and the time is more than 1 hour, 2 points will be counted for completing the task for one semester. More than 60 people 3 points, 100 people 4 points. Activities shall not exceed 2 times a week, and the excess shall be counted as 2 times a week.
2. Teachers use morning exercises to guide students to train musical instruments, dance, body and other skills, 5 times a week, 2 points per semester. Physical education teachers do morning exercises five times a week in one semester, with 2 points.
3, teachers undertake academic (or special education) lectures, must apply to the department in advance, by the Academic Affairs Office (Propaganda and United Front Work Office, Organization and Personnel Office) audit rear can be carried out. The content should meet the needs of teachers and students, be original, academic and ideological, and have positive educational significance. If the time is more than 90 minutes, there are more than 30 staff and more than 100 students. Each department (department) level counts as 1, and each college level counts as 1.5. After the end of the second game with the same content, the semester score is calculated according to the combined course. For the purpose of training teachers, teachers exchange achievements and experiences in teaching and research, teaching methods and work reports within the scope of teachers in the whole hospital according to the arrangement of the college, with 0.5 point each time.
4. Teachers who are concurrently the director of the teaching and research section and the secretary of the Communist Youth League branch of the department (department) can conscientiously perform their duties add 3 points per semester, and members of the General Party Branch (branch) and trade union leaders add 2 points per semester.
Teachers are also managers of laboratories and training rooms and can perform their duties. According to the completion, each semester will be scored 3 points. Teachers who are in charge and complete tasks will get 1.5 points each semester.
6. The teacher guides a young teacher, and the teaching and lesson plan design reach more than 2 courses, each semester 1 minute. There shall be no more than 3 young teachers to guide, and those who exceed will be given 3 points each semester.
7. According to the arrangement of the college, teachers go to relevant enterprises and institutions to practice and work as required, with a score of 0.5 per week.
8. Teachers participate in professional construction, write professional construction project declaration, etc., and the project construction plan is approved, reaching 5 points at the national level; 3 points at the autonomous region level; College level meter 1 minute. Subject to the approval of the highest inspection, no double counting, and no score if it is not approved.
9, department (Department) director to complete his job every semester 20 points; Other leaders of the department (department) complete their post work, with a score of 18 per semester; Departments, central departments (departments) and part-time officers complete their post work, and each semester 16 points.
Teaching and research
1, presided over and participated in the teaching and research projects established at the national, district, city and college levels, and won the projects. The host scored 8, 5, 4 and 3 points at a time according to the project level; Preside over and participate in teaching and scientific research projects initiated by the state, districts, cities and colleges. After the project completes the research task on schedule and passes the final acceptance, the moderator will score 18, 12, 8 and 4 points at one time according to the project level; The main participating members (based on the relevant work or achievements provided by the host) will be given 6, 4, 2, 1 point at a time according to the project level. For projects with excellent performance, the moderator gets 2 points and the members get 1 point. The tutors of college students' innovation and entrepreneurship program scored 4 points and 2 points at one time according to the district and college projects respectively. (If the problem is postponed due to poor research work, do not score. )
2. Publicly publish independent works, co-authors, translated works, editors-in-chief, deputy editors-in-chief, and teaching materials with certain academic level related to majors and teaching. Independent works, translations and chief editors scored 15, co-authors and deputy chief editors scored 8, and textbooks (more than 30,000 words) scored 4.
4. Obtain national patents, with 12 points for each invention patent, 8 points for each utility model patent and 5 points for each design patent.
5. Teachers have not presided over or participated in teaching and scientific research projects above junior college for two consecutive years; There are no published independent works, co-authors, translated works and editors-in-chief, deputy editors-in-chief, and teaching materials related to majors and teaching, but there are independent works, translated works and editors-in-chief; Not publishing professional and teaching research papers as the first author; Nor has it obtained the national invention, utility model or design patent. That is, teaching and research projects, zero points for two consecutive years, and 20 points for the academic year.
(5) Guide students to win prizes in competitions and teachers to win prizes in competitions.
1, teachers guide students to participate in all kinds of vocational skills competitions at all levels, and the instructors of award-winning students score according to the following standards.
Instruct students to win many awards in sub-project competitions of the same project competition at all levels, and score according to the highest-level awards won in sub-project competitions, without double counting; Many students in the same series of competitions will be awarded according to the highest level, and there will be no repeated awards.
2. With the consent of the college, teachers participate in competitions related to teaching skills organized by the state, autonomous regions, cities, colleges and departments, and the award-winning teachers score according to the scoring standards that guide students to participate in various vocational skills competitions at all levels.
() Four teaching evaluations
At the end of each semester, the Scientific Research Office will organize supervisors to give full-coverage supervision lectures to teachers in the whole hospital, and organize teachers in the whole hospital to evaluate students, peers and leaders. The results of supervising lectures account for 40%; Students' evaluation of teaching accounts for 35%; Peer evaluation accounts for10%; The evaluation of teachers by leaders accounts for 15%. Rank the evaluation scores from high to low, and if the four evaluation scores rank in the top 30% or above of the total number of teachers in each department, each person will be given 6 points; Ranked 3 1% in the total number of teachers in each department? Teachers between 60%, 4 points each; Ranked 6 1% in the total number of teachers in each department? Teachers between 90%, 2 points each; Teachers with four teaching evaluation scores ranking below 965438+ 0% of the total number of teachers in all departments will not be scored.
(VII) Teaching effect
Teachers' teaching effect is organized and implemented by the leading group of teachers' teaching quality assessment and evaluation in each department (department) according to the semester, covering the professional teachers under the centralized management of the department. The evaluation results of teaching effect are excellent, good, qualified and unqualified. They are 5 points, 3 points and 1 minute respectively. The number of outstanding teachers with excellent teaching effect cannot exceed 25% of the total number of teachers who participate in the evaluation of the department. Teaching effect evaluation includes the following five aspects:
① Teaching organization process. Such as the integration of teaching plan writing, teaching and doing, task implementation, project and case teaching, homework correction and so on.
② Teaching achievements. Such as the results of various competitions recognized by the college, the cultivation and mastery of students' skills, etc.
③ Teaching and research activities. Teachers participate in teaching and research activities, undertake teaching and research projects, talk about majors, talk about courses (class hours), and complete listening tasks;
4 professional ability. Ability to participate in specialty construction, curriculum construction, project construction, enterprise practice training and guide young teachers;
⑤ Other assessment aspects formulated by each department according to the characteristics of each major.
(8) Discipline attendance
College and department teaching inspectors supervise teachers' teaching situation every day, and report teachers' teaching accidents and teaching violations in time according to the college's regulations on the identification and handling of teaching accidents and teaching violations.
1, if the teacher violates the teaching level 1 time, 3 points will be deducted in informed criticism of the whole hospital, and the annual teaching quality assessment level shall not be rated as excellent;
2. Teacher 1 Class III accident, informed criticism of the whole hospital, 5 points will be deducted. The highest annual teaching quality assessment level is qualified;
3, the teacher's secondary accident 1 time, in the hospital informed criticism, the highest deduction of 8 points, the annual teaching quality assessment level is qualified;
4. If a teacher has a first-class accident 1 time, he will be deducted 15 in informed criticism, and the annual teaching quality assessment rating is unqualified;
5. Full-time teachers per semester, 3 points; 0.5 points will be deducted for sick leave every day, and 0.5 points will be deducted for being late and leaving early;
6. If you don't participate in meetings and activities organized by departments (departments) and colleges for no reason, 2 points will be deducted at a time.
Four. Evaluation and evaluation organization
The college has set up a leading group for teaching quality assessment headed by the leaders in charge of the college, which is fully responsible for the organization and implementation of the teaching quality assessment of college teachers. Members are made up of the heads of academic affairs office, scientific research office and departments (departments), some well-known teaching teachers and college directors. The Academic Affairs Office is responsible for organizing and implementing the examination and evaluation of the teaching quality of college teachers.
Each department (department) should set up a leading group for the assessment and evaluation of teachers' teaching quality in this department, and be fully responsible for the assessment and evaluation of teaching quality of full-time teachers, part-time teachers on campus and part-time teachers off campus. The team leader is the head of the department (department), and the members are composed of other heads of the department and the director of the teaching and research section.
The evaluation of teachers' teaching quality is conducted by departments (departments), and related projects are audited by academic affairs office, scientific research office, equipment management and information center and other departments.
V. Evaluation grade
The assessment grade is divided into four grades: excellent, good, qualified and unqualified.
Excellent: those who rank in the top 25% or above of the total number of participating teachers in the department in the academic year assessment score can be rated as excellent; Excellent proportion shall not exceed 20% of the total number of teachers participating in the department. Due to the academic year assessment, outstanding teachers also won the academic year teaching quality Excellence Award.
Good: the academic year assessment results rank 25% of the total number of participating teachers in this department? Teachers between 90% can be rated as good;
Qualified: the academic year assessment results rank 10% after the total number of teachers participating in the department, and are assessed as qualified;
Unqualified: the academic year assessment results are ranked after 3% of the total number of teachers participating in the hospital, and are assessed as unqualified.
Publicity and reconsideration
Each department (department) will publicize the scores and results of each sub-item of teacher evaluation in this department for three working days one week before the end of each semester. If there is no objection at the expiration of the publicity period, the department (department) will report the scores and results of each item to the college assessment leading group.
Teachers who have objections to their own or others' assessment scores may apply for reconsideration to the department assessment team during the publicity period, and the department assessment team will conduct a review. If there is any mistake, it will be corrected by the departmental assessment team and re-publicized.
Teachers who still have objections to the evaluation level after review by the department evaluation team can apply for reconsideration to the college evaluation leading group in real name, and the school evaluation leading group will review it. If there are any mistakes, the departmental assessment team will be instructed to correct them and re-publicize them. Due to the teacher's personal fraud, the assessment scores are inconsistent, and the parties are given informed criticism. If the circumstances are serious, they will be punished according to relevant regulations; Informed criticism, a member of the assessment team, will be given if the teacher's assessment level is wrong due to the work mistakes of the assessment team; Intentionally causing teachers' assessment scores to be inconsistent, they shall be investigated for responsibility according to relevant regulations.
The leading group of college assessment conducts sampling inspection on the assessment results of various departments (departments), and publishes the assessment results in the whole hospital after passing the examination.
VII. Evaluation and application of evaluation results
1, and the assessment results are used as the basis for promotion and evaluation of professional and technical positions.
2, the assessment results as the basis for job recruitment, salary promotion, etc.
3, the assessment results as an important condition and basis for recommendation, evaluation and selection.
4, the assessment results as an important basis for the annual performance distribution.
Any supernumerary teacher who is assessed as unqualified in the school year shall terminate the employment contract; Teachers who fail to pass the examination for two consecutive academic years will be transferred from their current posts. Stay in the post for one academic year and study at your own expense; Stop paying performance pay during the waiting period.
Eight. supplementary terms
1. The leading group for inspection and evaluation of teaching quality in our college is responsible for the interpretation of these rules. Matters not covered shall be supplemented separately.
2. These Measures shall come into force as of the date of promulgation.
Teacher Performance Appraisal Scheme II Chapter 1 General Rules
Article 1 Classroom teaching is the main link of school teaching activities. Strengthening the inspection of classroom teaching quality and objectively and accurately evaluating teachers' classroom teaching quality is the core content of school teaching quality management and the key to ensure normal teaching order and comprehensively improve teaching quality. In order to further firmly establish the central position of teaching work, strengthen the comprehensive dynamic inspection and monitoring of classroom teaching process, ensure and improve the quality of classroom teaching, and give full play to the positive role of teachers in teaching and educating people, this scheme is specially formulated.
Chapter II Purpose of Evaluation
Article 2 Through the inspection and evaluation of the quality of teachers' classroom teaching, teachers can be helped to understand and discover the problems existing in teaching in time and provide a basis for teachers to improve teaching in a targeted manner. Promote teachers to constantly improve teaching content and teaching methods and improve the quality of classroom teaching.
Article 3 provides an objective basis for teaching management departments and secondary colleges to fully understand the teaching situation, continuously collect, analyze and synthesize the feedback information of teaching work and teaching quality, discover and study the problems existing in teaching in time, and improve teaching work.
Article 4 Promote the construction of teachers, and gradually establish and improve the teacher evaluation mechanism. It provides reference for teachers' professional assessment, teaching awards and professional title evaluation.
Chapter III Evaluation Object and Time
Article 5 All full-time and part-time teachers who undertake the task of full-time undergraduate teaching in our school.
Article 1 Evaluate once every semester.
Chapter IV Organization and Leadership
Article 7 A school shall set up a leading group for the evaluation of classroom teaching quality of school teachers, with the school leaders in charge of teaching as the leader, the directors of the Academic Affairs Office and the Evaluation Office as the deputy heads, and the principals of secondary colleges, the Academic Affairs Office, the Evaluation Office and other relevant departments as the participants, so as to comprehensively deploy, guide and supervise the evaluation of classroom teaching quality of the whole school. The specific work is organized by the Teaching Quality Section of the Academic Affairs Office.
Article 8 Each secondary college shall set up a working group for the evaluation of teachers' classroom teaching quality (hereinafter referred to as the evaluation group). Evaluation team? )。 The evaluation team is generally composed of leaders of secondary colleges appointed by the school, teaching supervisors of secondary colleges, department heads, some key teachers and school teaching supervisors, and is fully responsible for the inspection and evaluation of classroom teaching quality of the unit.
Chapter V Evaluation Indicators
Article 9 The evaluation index system of teachers' classroom teaching quality is mainly based on the relevant documents of the Ministry of Education and the Provincial Department of Education and the teaching regulations of normal universities, which are divided into two categories:
(1) Evaluation Index System of Classroom Teaching Quality in Normal Universities (for experts and peers) (see Annex 1).
(2) Evaluation index system of classroom teaching quality in normal universities (for students) (see Annex 2).
The first chapter is the composition and evaluation method of the evaluation system.
Article 10 Composition of evaluation system
The evaluation system of classroom teaching quality mainly consists of three parts: student evaluation, peer evaluation and expert evaluation.
(A) students' teaching evaluation
Students comprehensively evaluate the classroom teaching of all the courses they have learned each semester through the educational administration system. Student evaluation is arranged by the school, usually before each semester.
(2) Peer evaluation
Peer evaluation is based on departments, and teachers in the same department evaluate their teachers online on the basis of listening to each other's lectures. Peer evaluation is generally arranged before the end of each semester.
(3) Expert evaluation
Members of the expert group generally include leaders of secondary colleges, department heads and some key teachers, as well as school teaching supervisors appointed by the school. Each secondary college shall submit the evaluation results to the Teaching Quality Section of the Academic Affairs Office within one week before the start of the next semester.
School-level teaching supervision, random lectures of middle-level cadres and information collected by student teaching information officers can provide reference for the monitoring of classroom teaching level in secondary colleges. For the information provided by school-level teaching supervisors, middle-level cadres who attend classes at random, and student teaching information officers, if the teacher violates the relevant regulations of teaching operation (specifically, according to the Measures for the Identification and Handling of Teaching Accidents in Teachers' Colleges (Trial)), after verification, in addition to handling them according to the relevant regulations, 65,438+00 and 8 will be deducted from the comprehensive score of classroom teaching quality evaluation according to the teaching accidents of Grade I, II and III respectively.
Article 11 Evaluation methods
(1) The evaluation of teachers' classroom teaching quality is based on students' evaluation of teaching, peer evaluation and expert evaluation. The evaluation results of each aspect are given according to the percentage system.
(2) At the beginning of each semester, the Teaching Quality Section of the Academic Affairs Office makes statistics on each teacher's last semester and summarizes each teacher's final score.
Chapter VII Feedback and Handling of Evaluation Results
Article 12 Feedback of evaluation results
(1) The Teaching Quality Section of the Academic Affairs Office will distribute the summary results to all secondary colleges in writing.
(2) Each secondary college is responsible for feeding back the evaluation results of classroom teaching quality to the participating teachers respectively, and the evaluation results are not open to the public and do not consult each other.
Thirteenth evaluation results processing
(1) The evaluation results of classroom teaching quality will serve as one of the important bases for teachers' year-end assessment, job promotion, job title evaluation, various teaching-related awards and teachers' job appointment.
(2) the establishment of the school? Excellent teaching quality award? Teachers who have scored in the top 20% or 30% of the teaching quality evaluation in the past two years and meet certain conditions will be awarded? Excellent teaching quality award? The school gives certain material and spiritual rewards.
(3) Teachers whose teaching quality scores rank 5% after the total number of teachers participating in the college with the assistance of their departments; Teachers who rank 5% after the total number of teachers participating in the college for the second time in a row may not participate in the promotion of professional titles and the evaluation awards in that year. I write a written analysis, the time limit and measures for reform and improvement, and submit it to my college. Secondary colleges are responsible for helping and supervising the implementation of specific measures to improve teaching level or change jobs according to specific conditions.
Chapter VIII Other Matters
Fourteenth teachers offer multiple courses in the same semester, and these courses belong to the same college. The final evaluation score of teachers is the average score of these courses.
Fifteenth colleges and departments of the organization and management of classroom teaching quality evaluation, will be used as one of the basis for the selection of outstanding teaching management advanced collective.
Article 10 The members of the working group of classroom teaching quality evaluation in secondary colleges should go deep into the classroom to check the teaching situation and teaching operation.
Seventeenth secondary colleges should further establish the awareness of teaching quality, closely focus on the key work of improving teaching quality, clarify management responsibilities, implement management tasks, do a good job in classroom teaching quality inspection and evaluation, and promote the continuous improvement of teaching quality.
Article 18 The Academic Affairs Office shall be responsible for the interpretation of this scheme.
Teacher Performance Appraisal Scheme III According to the spirit of the document "Guiding Opinions on Doing a Good Job in Teaching Quality Assessment of Teachers in Provincial Colleges and Universities" (_ _ J [20 _] No.4), this method is formulated to further strengthen and standardize the teaching quality assessment of teachers in our college and continuously improve the teaching quality and level.
I. Organizational leadership
Under the leadership of the dean, the academic affairs office is responsible for the assessment of teachers' teaching quality, and all teaching departments (departments) cooperate with the organization and implementation. The college has set up a leading group for the evaluation of teachers' teaching quality, which is composed of members of the college's teaching work Committee. Mainly responsible for (reviewing) the evaluation scheme and method of teachers' teaching quality, and studying and dealing with major problems in the evaluation. Each teaching department (department) should set up a department (department) teacher teaching quality assessment team, whose members should include: director, secretary, secretary, teaching and research section and laboratory director, who is specifically responsible for the assessment of teaching quality of teachers in the department (department).
Second, the evaluation principle
The assessment work is carried out in accordance with the requirements of the state for the positions of university teachers, and the principles of openness, fairness and impartiality are adhered to; Adhere to the principle of helping students cultivate and improve teaching quality; Adhere to the principle of combining grading with classification; Adhere to the principle of combining qualitative assessment with quantitative assessment, daily assessment with semester and school year assessment, and evaluate the quality of teachers' work realistically.
Iii. Evaluation methods and procedures
1. Teachers' teaching quality assessment is conducted once every semester to assess all teachers who undertake teaching tasks this semester.
2. The specific implementation of the evaluation of teachers' teaching quality shall be carried out in accordance with the Comprehensive Evaluation Plan of Teachers' Work Quality in Vocational and Technical College. Divided into full-time, part-time and external teachers, and assessed and calculated respectively.
Iv. evaluation results
1. The assessment results of teachers' teaching quality are divided into four grades: excellent, good, qualified and unqualified. Excellent refers to the assessment score? 90, the proportion of excellent grades shall not exceed 25% of the total number of teachers participating in the assessment; Good means 90> assessment score? 76; Does passing mean a 76> assessment score? 60, unqualified refers to the assessment score.
2. The excellent grades of teachers' teaching quality assessment results are the necessary conditions for teachers' excellent annual comprehensive assessment.
3. If there is a problem with teaching style or there is a teaching accident in that year, the excellent title of teaching quality evaluation will be cancelled.
4 teachers' teaching quality assessment results are unqualified, and they shall not declare a higher level of professional and technical positions in the next year.
5. Each teaching department (department) will complete the assessment results of teachers' teaching quality before July 10 every year and report them to the Academic Affairs Office. The academic affairs office shall report to the dean for examination and approval after preliminary examination. The Academic Affairs Office issued a document to announce the results of the annual evaluation of teachers' teaching quality.
6. The evaluation results of teachers' teaching quality shall be stored in personal business files by the personnel department, and all the evaluation results of teachers' teaching quality shall be submitted to the Personnel Department of the Provincial Department of Education and the Higher Education Department for the record in the form of a written report before mid-August.
Teacher Performance Appraisal Scheme IV This method is specially formulated to strengthen the management of teaching quality in our school, fully mobilize teachers' enthusiasm and creativity, and promote the institutionalization, standardization and scientificity of teachers' teaching quality appraisal.
Article 1 Purpose of evaluation
1. Make value judgments on whether the teaching process and its results meet certain quality requirements, help teachers understand the advantages and disadvantages of teaching, and provide support for teachers' growth.
2. Guide and encourage teachers to increase their investment in teaching, and provide a basis for teachers' award, promotion and employment.
3. Establish and improve the teaching quality guarantee system, and constantly improve the quality of education and teaching.
Article 2 Evaluation principle
Follow the teaching rules of higher education and adapt to the characteristics of college teachers' work; Emphasize the theory of applying what you have learned and highlight the main position of students' evaluation; Emphasize the evaluation of teachers' morality and pay attention to the all-round development of teachers; Emphasize openness and transparency to ensure the fairness and justice of the assessment results.
Article 3 Evaluation object
1. Teachers' teaching quality assessment objects are full-time teachers and experimental teaching staff (hereinafter referred to as teachers) engaged in teaching in schools.
2. Teachers who have been approved by the school to continue their studies, visit schools, take long vacations, etc. Those who have not undertaken teaching tasks will not be assessed and will be recorded in the file with qualified results.
3. The evaluation of teaching quality of external teachers shall be implemented with reference to these measures.
Article 4 Evaluation Contents
1. The assessment of teachers' teaching quality focuses on classroom teaching (including experimental training teaching) and professional ethics.
2. Students' evaluation takes into account the evaluation of teachers' guidance of students' extracurricular learning, extracurricular counseling and answering questions and homework correction.
3. Peer and supervision evaluation should take into account the evaluation of teachers' lesson preparation, professional ability, homework assignment and correction, examination, participation in teaching and research activities, undertaking the teaching capital construction tasks of this major (or public course), undertaking students' extracurricular learning guidance and undertaking various declarations, assessments and evaluation preparations of this major.
Article 5 Evaluation Methods and Requirements
1. In terms of assessment methods, qualitative evaluation is combined with quantitative evaluation, and process evaluation is combined with result evaluation.
2. On the subject of assessment, the assessment of teachers' teaching quality is divided into three aspects: student evaluation, supervision evaluation and peer evaluation, and the weight distribution is 6:2:2.