1, people who often punch in with nails know the knowledge of virtual positioning punching more or less. The sentenced CEO made such a software to help users realize punching. The software itself is charged. From the news, we can know that he made an illegal profit of 5 million through software. So the nail company took him to court. After the first trial of both parties, the court sentenced the defendant to five and a half years' imprisonment. Many people are puzzled by this, just providing virtual positioning, why it takes so long to sentence.
2. Why did it take so long? Although Daniel provided a virtual location, the basis of sentencing has little to do with it. Observing the whole case and testimony, we can probably get three reasons for nailing the prosecution. First, the technology provided by Daniel interfered with the company system; Second, Daniel has made illegal profits; Third, Daniel's company knows all this. What is really serious here is the first one. Interfering with the company's system is equivalent to destroying the computer system, plus the direct composition of communication and profit? The consequences are particularly serious? Statement.
3. The lack of a good lawyer is actually testimony to some extent? Misleading? Judge. For example, the testimony of how the software works is very simple and theoretically not illegal. But it was used directly in the testimony? Intercept? A kind of word, the judge is not a technician, which makes people feel particularly serious. In addition, Daniel stressed that he did not modify the source code, which had a great impact on the whole case and was considered to have harmed himself. If you appeal next and hire a good lawyer, you can make the judge think that it is inappropriate to get user data to punch in, or rearrange the testimony, and things may turn around.