Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Education and training - Do you think subsidies and welfare for the poor should be abolished to encourage them to make progress?
Do you think subsidies and welfare for the poor should be abolished to encourage them to make progress?
1, subsidies for the poor come from the government to avoid social unrest, serve the people and develop the practice of * * *. There are complicated factors such as history, geographical environment, policies, individuals and resources, which need to be solved in different ways.

2. For the society, it is good for everyone to have enough to eat. If some people even have problems with food and clothing, there is no perfect protection policy, and their survival is in crisis, the problem of things will evolve.

Besides, not all poor people are not self-motivated. Of course, the ideological and social activities of the poor are not extensive, and some people can't work yet. Sometimes, no matter how hard the poor try, their thoughts are relatively conservative and they can't change the status quo.

Therefore, subsidies to the poor should not be abolished, and the standards and conditions of subsidies will only be adjusted according to the overall changes of wealth in a certain period of time. However, subsidies to the poor do not mean that blood transfusion is the only way to solve the fundamental problem. It is the unshirkable responsibility of the government to create better hematopoietic conditions for the poor people who have the ability to work and achieve sustainable income growth. The current "precise poverty alleviation" is actually the concept of analyzing the causes of poverty in different places, different groups and even different individuals, so that they can develop sustainably.

Try to change the status quo