The company held an impromptu meeting, which not only introduced and discussed the new project, but also decided who would be in charge. Everyone who attended the meeting knew in their hearts that this was not a default decision, but only one of the two veterans. Routine still has to go. "What do you think of this project?" Different from the past, everyone will express their opinions in turn except the recorder of this meeting.

A said, "This project is very good and promising. If it is done well, it can bring huge benefits to the company ... "B immediately said," Even so, the difficulty of the project is obvious. "

"Indeed, from the overall evaluation, the advantages are very obvious from the three points of 1 ... 2...3 ... but the xx problems involved and the xx problems are not easy to solve. As mentioned from ..., the company already has this hardware condition, but it still needs a trial and error process. Personally, I want to know whether it can be used ... to solve ... ".

C, colleagues who have just participated in several projects have not finished yet. The leader who had bowed his head looked up and saw his one eye.

Unexpectedly, this time the general manager personally led the team, which is understandable, but the position of deputy project manager was given. In fact, if you look at the speeches of A and B carefully, what they said is reasonable, but they are all empty, as if they didn't say anything. What C said was actually mentioned by the leaders at the meeting, but it was reorganized and put into the framework, which was very organized and comfortable to listen to.

Everyone heard this sentence. Why can only he handle them and turn them into his own? For example, why do you still have a hard time after listening to so many reasons? In fact, just like eating, just staying on the surface, "seeing food" is not enough. You have to "eat", "chew" and "digest" to "get nutrients" and nourish your body. Thinking is the core of language, and language is the coat of thinking. Establish your own systematic thinking and be a person who solves problems in the way of "application problems".

First, multiple-choice questions to application questions

1. scene

Group training was arranged. After that, the leader casually asked several people about the training quality.

Step 2: Answer mode

Multiple choice answer: the training is quite good, not bad.

Answer to the fill-in-the-blank question: This change training is a bit CDE style.

Answer to the short answer: the training is very standardized and not practical enough, especially the kind of data modification. How can we make up now?

Answer to the application question: The training is a bit embarrassing, especially it is not feasible to supplement the research data of the submitted products from the operational point of view, but you can make a risk assessment and communicate with the officials to dispel their doubts.

3. Benefits

The displayed ability may not fully represent the real strength, but it can help us better identify the level of others, and also make us stronger and more conceptual, and strive to advance from multiple-choice questions to application questions.

Second, two application-level frameworks.

1.IRAC

Question+law+analysis+conclusion (so).

Step 2: Scenes

When checking the verification report, a suspicious bug was found. How to express it can reflect logic.

Give a chestnut.

The data here is not handled correctly.

(2) Usually, each batch of samples needs blank before testing, which is deducted during calculation to ensure the accuracy of the results.

(3) From the attached atlas, there is no corresponding blank injection record for this batch of samples, and the blank value of the previous batch of samples shall be subtracted during calculation.

④ The results of this batch are not credible and need to be re-injected, tested and calculated.

4. Benefits

This is a common case analysis and writing framework in law schools. Needless to say, the lawyer's logic.

Third, two application-level frameworks.

1.WYH

What (definition, explanation, example) +why (principle, analysis) +hoW (application, suggestion).

Step 2: Scenes

Recently, a new intern came, very shy, seldom talking to others, and afraid to communicate with the leader actively.

Give a chestnut.

Her leader said this: "xX, I know that you have just arrived, and you are not familiar with everyone, so you are embarrassed to talk;" But if you have any questions, you must communicate with me, otherwise I don't know which step you have understood, and it is difficult to arrange tasks for you; If you really can't talk, you can ask your deskmate first, and then ask me if you can't solve it. "

4. Benefits

The most classic, can't think of other tall methods at once, you can choose first, both expression and thinking are very practical. As long as you are aware of the existence of shelves, and then fill them one by one, it is not difficult to express them logically and orderly.

Fourth, the top matching value at the paper level

1. Definition

Have a knowledge system, start from the overall situation and the whole, find problems, describe problems and solve problems.

2. Give a chestnut

You can refer to director Chen Kaige's evaluation of actors' performances in I am an Actor. In order to solve a point problem, he will look at it from a bigger system: what is the life of the characters? What's your character like? What's his mood in this scene? What role does he play? What is the interaction between actors?

3. Benefits

We can not only see the big from the small, but also see the small from the big, and look at it at a point in a system.

Fifth, small tips.

1.PS: Divine power is not built in a day. Thought is the core of language, and language is the coat of thought. Improving the value of speech is not the goal, but the key is to cultivate systematic thinking.

2. Don't rush to judge, define the problem first, and avoid the black-and-white way of thinking. Some people say I'm bad. Who made the evaluation, is it true, and what is the basis? How much does it affect me? Do I need to change it? What can be done in the short term? How to persist for a long time?

3. Before thinking systematically, try to brush short and fragmentary things as little as possible, and it will be more helpful to read systematic books. When reading a book, we should not only look at the text content, but also look at the relationship between the text structure and paragraphs.

Feynman learning method, repeating what you have learned to others is the best learning method, and it can also force us to think about perfecting our knowledge system.