In view of the above three possibilities, the first one is not a big problem, the second one depends on whether the local policy and class time meet the policy requirements, and the third one is definitely not allowed. ?
The "double reduction policy" provides a "pause button" for training institutions. With the formal implementation of the "double reduction policy", on the one hand, the academic burden of students has been effectively reduced, on the other hand, various off-campus training institutions all over the country have begun to press the "pause button". This topic has also caused a heated discussion on the Internet.
After the Ministry of Education issued the "double reduction policy", many training institutions in China, especially those with insufficient strength, were faced with two choices: "automatic closure or forced transformation", and there was no third way feasible. This is an objective fact.
Will teachers in training institutions be "unemployed" or "re-employed"? Whether they close or choose to transform, the teachers in these institutions will have to accept the painful choice of "unemployment" or "re-employment".