Generally speaking, the following two situations are very regrettable: first, the article is acceptable and the title is lame; Second, the lack of the necessary sense of style, neither donkey nor horse nor fish.
The reason for saying "pity" is that both of these situations can be changed through special training, but we are often used to reviewing systems based on ready-made materials and boring experience, rather than looking for new teaching content through effective and vivid information feedback.
Let's take a look at the writing questions in the 20 15 mock exam for senior three in this city, and talk about the value of the questions and the standards of the proposed questions in the context of the choice of argumentative writing style.
22. Read the following materials and write as required. (60 points)
The word "Na" has two completely opposite meanings in Modern Chinese Dictionary: it means "accept", such as accept; It also means "delivery", such as paying taxes. What are your experiences and feelings about this? Please choose your own angle, write your own topic, and write a narrative or argumentative essay of at least 800 words.
As we all know, topic writing is a general requirement of new material composition and a concentrated expression of students' writing ability. A good argumentative topic not only points out the direction of writing, but also standardizes the basic content of writing; It not only has the function of outlining, but also has the function of making the finishing point. Because of this, smart reviewers can often make a rough judgment on the merits of an article through its title.
The above materials show a dialectics and a world outlook through the two opposite and complementary meanings of the word "Na", that is, completely opposite things often have identity, mutual exclusion and interdependence, or parallelism, or goal consistency. Of course, the placement of materials is not only in the sense of "acceptance", but also in this way, students can expand their associations and express their "experiences and feelings" from the outside to the inside. Then, take and give, give and get, new and old, good and bad, advance and retreat, attack and defend, strong and weak, high and weak.
Torrid, a French social psychologist, once pointed out that the test of a person's intelligence is whether he can accommodate two opposite thoughts at the same time without interfering with his behavior. This is the famous "Torrid Theorem". It should be said that this question leads to such a relative concept, dialectical thinking and harmonious wisdom.
There is no doubt that it is appropriate to carry out speculative inquiry in one group of relationships or multiple groups of relationships; If you only start from a certain side or angle, it will only meet the meaning of the question at most. This difference in examination concept can also be roughly seen from the title.
For example, prosperity depends on danger, retrogression is progress, giving is another name for harvest, no one takes it for granted, counting the shadow of the sun is the most common impermanence, why don't you spit out new branches when you don't accept the wind and rain, and the breeze will know that flowers are more colorful. These titles are mostly relational, and all of them are argumentative titles without exception.
But if you look at the problem dialectically, you should go out. The lost achievements, the two opposites of the same thing, positive and negative dependence, gain and loss, and a comprehensive view of the problem have all come back. Living in contradiction, a blessing in disguise is a blessing in disguise, the opposite is harmonious, and the angle takes into account both sides of things.
As for "different people have different opinions", "in the age of science and technology, there are joys and sorrows", "those who can take the exam should be open-minded", "can afford it, can let it go", "adjust measures to local conditions", "two sides", "suffering is a double-edged sword", "as you sow, you reap what you sow", and you have a good eye for pearls. Just from the topic, you either misunderstood the connotation of the material, or simply started a new stove and talked to yourself, or it was mysterious and unreasonable, or it was rude and vulgar at will.
From the classification and explanation of the above composition topics, it is not difficult to understand how the topic affects the taste of the article and determines the direction of the article, and it is not difficult to infer how it affects the psychology of marking. The topic is important, needless to say, every word is fateful and must not be sloppy.
Of course, we can also sum up the general characteristics of good argumentative questions: first, concise and clear. Ambiguous, indifferent, thoughtful, straightforward, clear at a glance, the topic is argument, often aphorism. This title is more suitable for moderate argumentative writing in article learning. Second, it is novel and unique. Titles should be unfamiliar, vivid, eye-catching, unique and fascinating, and often combined with rhetorical devices such as metaphor, contrast, pun, quotation, parody and rhetorical question. This title is more suitable for miscellaneous feelings, comments and argumentations.
The topic is the "eyes" of the article. So in our writing training, we might as well divide the content into more details. How to plan questions, including the principles and skills of planning questions, including the appreciation of good questions and the transformation and upgrading of poor questions, must enter the teachers' review vision.