In the publication of sci, the number and ranking of authors have attracted much attention. Different numbers of people and different rankings will have different gold content and different recognition, which will lead to different authors. So is it useful for sci instructors to do one thing and I am two things? It depends on the accreditation standards of relevant units.
First of all, in terms of the unit's recognition of sci requirements,
The author often publishes sci papers to meet the requirements of the unit. For example, graduate students get extra points for evaluating their professional titles. Both schools and professional title units recognize sci papers, but at the same time, they also put forward specific requirements for recognized sci papers, which will be different according to the actual situation.
Similarly, sci papers are also recognized, but what kind of sci papers are recognized is different in different units, which leads me to be a second work of sci tutor, which may or may not be useful. The key is to see whether the unit where the second author of sci works recognizes the second author of sci. If it is approved, I will do two things if the sci instructor does one thing, otherwise it will be useless. It is recommended that individuals first understand the requirements of publishing sci papers in their own units, and then publish sci papers recognized by their own units.
According to the requirements of many units for sci authors at present, it may be useful for sci instructors to make one work, but the probability of usefulness is relatively low. Most units are subject to the approval of sci works or communication authors.
Secondly, just from the second work of sci,
Sci is a high-level article. Even if it is published as two works, it proves that the author has a certain academic level, which is better than not being published. In other words, from the two works of sci alone, it is certainly useful, but how useful it is is relative. For example, if you have two sci works and your competitors don't have sci, you will gain more advantages. At this point, can you say that it is useless for sci instructors to do one thing and I do two things? The answer is no.
Generally speaking, I am the second work of a sci tutor. If it is used in a specific situation, it is useful and useless, and the corresponding evaluation conditions have the final say. If it is not used in a specific occasion, the size used will vary according to the actual situation.