The common problems in the paper are the unclear distinction between the paper and the current situation description, and the literature research methods.

1, regardless of the certificate.

Thesis is a unique style, which is different from official documents, essays and social papers. Many students lack problem consciousness, and the papers they write are not like papers at all, such as literati essays and government reports. The core of the thesis is argumentation. The so-called argument, the core elements are the topic (the problem you deal with), the argument (your point of view on this issue), the argument and the way of argument.

It is necessary to clarify your thesis, sort out your academic achievements accordingly, and then explain where your argument is new. Arguments must be propositional: express a true and false point of view with declarative sentences. Remember ambiguity, remember argument drift. Only by conceiving your own thesis around several elements of argument can the thesis be like a thesis.

2. Literature review and current situation description are unclear.

This often appears in foreign research reviews. On the one hand, because of the lack of foreign language ability, I haven't actually seen the foreign research, on the other hand, I don't have a clear understanding of the literature review (research review), so I often write the research review as a description of the current legislative situation.

3. Literature research method.

This has been said to be rotten. What research does not need to read the literature? If literature research is also a method worth mentioning, then keyboard input method, staying up late struggle method and editing things can probably be counted. Generally speaking, research methods are relatively specific and unique methods within a certain discipline, while reading and writing are not research methods.