Although there are many styles of argumentative writing, they all follow the basic writing rules, that is, "viewpoint+material+analysis". It can be seen that the basic path of argumentative writing is accurate expression of opinions, full possession of materials and strong argument, which cannot be crossed.
Discussions are often emotional. People, events, scenes, events, feelings and reasons that touch feelings are called catalysts, commonly known as "words". Talking aimlessly around words is called rambling. Usually chatting is rambling and of low quality, which is acceptable as a pastime, but it is not good for long-term standardization of argumentative writing.
The following is the chat record between classmates:
Student A: I watched a TV play yesterday. That policeman is really great. He knocked down two robbers with one shot.
Student B: (obviously unconvinced) What is this? I saw a kung fu movie yesterday, and Ouchi was the best. He knocked down more than a dozen martial arts experts by himself.
Student A: Really? Give it a try! (Next, he showed the fighting moves to student B, and student B immediately took the moves and they gestured. )
In students' recess life, chatting and recess activities like this are too common. From this kind of chat, we find that the student is just a simple narrator, and the purpose of the narrator is not to reason, nor to discuss, but to occupy some psychological vanity advantage in low-level comparison. On student a, it seems that the policeman who can take down two robbers with one shot is himself; In the place of student B, it seems that the ouchi master who can beat more than a dozen martial arts masters is himself. Because the two men didn't decide the advantage in their hearts with words, they naturally triggered the behavior of "fighting" behind them.
Students who are influenced by the low-quality chat environment at school will also be affected when they go to work as adults, which can be seen from the chat in the adult office.
Adult A (saw the holiday notice yesterday afternoon): Five days, which is too long and boring! what are you going to do？
Adult b: what can I do? Still come to work overtime and surf the internet, but unfortunately there is no overtime pay.
Adult A: I'll give you money as long as you come.
Adult b: ok! Really?
Adult A: Paper money, do you want it?
Adult b: (angry, staring at each other like a murderer) ...
I don't doubt that "poor mouth" can bring "happy life", but "blind poverty" and "gossiping", especially wasting a lot of time on "blind poverty" and "gossiping", are undoubtedly signs that the quality of life is getting weaker and weaker. What's more frightening is that it causes vulgarization, vulgarization, kitsch and disorder in language, and also restricts the improvement of people's ideological level. It should be said that this is extremely unfavorable to the development of language. Some people tend to digress in their writing, which is related to "chatting". We urgently need to improve the quality of chat. When chatting, you should always be able to express your views around words and consciously use some materials to prove your views. Speak rationally and better, and raise the content of your speech to the height of emotion and reason. In this way, people's expression level will be improved and their ideological level will be improved. Of course, argumentative writing will be less worrying.