1. Read the review comments carefully: the reviewer will review the paper in detail and put forward suggestions and suggestions for revision. In the process of reviewing the manuscript, the author needs to read the opinions of the reviewers carefully and understand their opinions and requirements. If you have questions or don't understand, you can communicate with the reviewers.
2. Respond to the reviewer's comments in time: In the process of reviewing the manuscript, the author needs to respond to the reviewer's comments in time. This includes accepting or rejecting peer review opinions and specific responses to revised suggestions. The defense should be clear, accurate and organized, which can fully explain the author's views and reasons for revision.
3. Carefully revise the paper: According to the reviewers' opinions, the author needs to revise the paper. The revision should be careful to ensure the logic, consistency and accuracy of the paper. At the same time, the author should also pay attention to the accuracy of format specification and language expression.
4. Prepare defense materials: Some journals will ask authors to defend themselves during the review process. In this case, the author needs to prepare relevant defense materials, including defense speeches, PPT, etc. The defense materials should be concise and focused, which can clearly show the author's research content and achievements.
5. Keep a positive attitude: The review process may be long and tedious, but the author needs to keep a positive attitude. No matter what the reviewers' opinions are, we should take them seriously and try our best to improve the paper. At the same time, the author should also believe in his research ability and achievements, and don't give up easily.