For example, Wu Han's Talk on Bones.
The main argument is "We China people have backbone."
The sub-arguments are 1, wealth can't be lewd, 2, poverty can't be moved, and 3, power can't be bent.
Demonstrate the main arguments from three aspects.
Question 2: What is the central argument? What is a sub-argument? The central argument is written around that argument, and the sub-argument is an argument described in a paragraph.
Question 3: What is argument ... quarrel ... argument? Hello, I hope I can help you!
An argument is your point of view.
The basis for supporting your point of view.
Argumentation is the process of proving an argument with arguments.
Argument, argument and argument are the three elements of argumentative writing. Argument is soul, argument is flesh and blood, and argument is skeleton. Argumentation is to solve the problem of what to prove, argument is to solve the problem of what to prove, and argument is to solve the problem of how to prove. The three are closely related and can form a complete demonstration process. _
Three elements of argumentative writing: arguments and arguments
Argument: Argument is the viewpoint to be discussed and expounded in the article, and it is the viewpoint and proposition to be expressed by the author. When reading an argumentative essay, the first thing is to find, extract and understand the arguments of the article.
Every argumentative paper is inseparable from arguments, arguments and arguments. Therefore, clear arguments, conclusive arguments and rigorous argumentation are the three basic elements of argumentative writing.
Argumentative essay (1) is the author's views or opinions on the issues to be discussed, and it is the soul of argumentative essay writing, which plays a leading role in guiding the whole text and making it clear at the beginning. Establishing arguments is the premise of writing argumentative essays. Argumentative argument has the following five requirements:
1 correct. The purpose of writing argumentative essays is to preach the truth, distinguish right from wrong, distinguish right from wrong, beauty and ugliness. Therefore, the correctness of ideological views is the first.
2 very different. In the article, the author must clearly express his views and express them unequivocally, so that readers can see at a glance and understand them clearly.
3 tight. The expression of arguments must be cautious, rigorous and impeccable, and people who disagree should not be given any chance.
4 concentration. An argumentative essay can only put forward one central argument, and the whole article always focuses on one argument, expounding the truth in depth and solving problems. The requirement of centralization is to avoid the shift of arguments, and the arguments in the latter part are different from those in the former part, or the concepts are confused.
⑤ profound. The arguments put forward in this paper should be the author's fresh and original views on things, which can profoundly reveal the essence of things, rather than general platitudes, so as to convince readers more effectively and give people profound enlightenment.
When writing an argumentative essay, we should pay attention to explaining the central argument and sub-arguments clearly. The central argument is the basic point of argumentative writing, the theme and core of the whole paper, and plays a leading role in the article. Subordinate argument is an argument that clarifies and serves the central argument.
There are various forms to put forward arguments, generally the following four: First, put forward arguments at the beginning. The second is to put forward an argument at the end. The third is the argument put forward by the article. Fourth, the argument runs through the whole paper. The usual writing methods are ① and ②, and the essay should also be based on these two methods, and then learn the latter two writing methods.
(2) Arguments are facts and reasons used to prove arguments. So arguments include factual materials and truth, that is, theoretical materials. Fact materials include both positive and negative facts, and data materials are one of them. What principles should be followed in selecting factual and theoretical materials?
For positive factual materials, the first is the principle of authenticity. If the parameter is true, the parameter can be *; If the argument is not valid, the argument is suspicious. Secondly, the principle of typicality. It is required to choose materials that can profoundly reveal the essence of things, that is, materials with broad representation as arguments. An argument often has many arguments to prove from different aspects and angles. But among many arguments that can prove it, there are always some most appropriate and convincing arguments, which are typical arguments. In addition, we must follow the principle of novelty. When reading articles, people are easily attracted by novel materials, and they are also easily disgusted with old materials. Therefore, the choice of factual arguments must also follow the principle of seeking novelty, belittle the old, seek near and far, and work hard on the word "new".
The principle of negative facts should be adopted. In order to explain the truth thoroughly, argumentative papers need to analyze and demonstrate arguments from multiple angles, which requires us to choose arguments from different angles, not only to choose positive materials, but also to explain things from the front; We should also choose negative materials, analyze things from a negative perspective, compare positive and negative, compare positive and negative, and highlight the central argument. Negative materials complement incomprehensible results.
Data materials should follow scientific principles. On the surface, the data are just a few simple numbers. In fact, it has rich connotations, often the crystallization of countless labors, the performance of brilliant achievements, the reflection of unremitting efforts, or the record of waste and destruction. The introduction of scientific data into argumentative essays can enhance the effectiveness of argumentation and has irrefutable persuasiveness ... >>
Question 4: What do you mean by argumentative arguments? Argumentative essay is an article around the central argument. In order to prove the central argument, each argumentative paper will also have some opinions and opinions of the author himself or others on the central argument, which are sub-arguments.
Question 5: Debate: What is the central argument and what is the sub-argument? For example, I know nothing. _? ) the central argument refers to the central argument of the main discussion, that is, the secondary narrative point of view, mainly the distinction between primary and secondary.