There are some free channels, and some are indeed more reliable. For example, if something is officially launched, you can have the right to test it for free, but what you can test for free can only see the degree of repetition, and what you can't see is to tell you which part is repeated, and then you can change it, so that you can reduce the weight. But if you can only see the degree of repetition, you will only know what the degree of repetition is.
However, some people claim that it is a free test and then tell you all kinds of test data, but this test is not reliable. This is a big problem, because I have contacted some people who write papers in this industry and found that using HowNet to search and using dimension to survey are two concepts. It was about 8% when using HowNet, and it may rise to 15% when using dimension census. Who do you think is right? Both websites are official website, so they either use piracy rights or spend money to check, but even so, there are still repeated differences between the two websites.
Those completely free websites, some folk wild websites, you don't even know what his paper reproduction is based on. Although he said what kind of database it is connected to, but. How do we know if he has Unicom? You don't even know what the reporting standard of this test he gave you, so you have to finalize it, and finally you must use HowNet, because all schools use HowNet to check, but his system is slightly different from our personal user's system, but your repetition control is around 10%, and there will be no problem after basic.