1. originality: the reviewer will first check the originality of the paper, that is, whether the paper has put forward new ideas, theories or methods. If the paper only repeats the existing research, its value will be greatly reduced.

2. Research method: The reviewer will evaluate whether the research method of the paper is scientific and rigorous. This includes experimental design, data collection and analysis. If there is something wrong with the research methods, the results of the paper may be unreliable.

3. Results and discussion: The reviewer will carefully read the results and discussion part of the paper to evaluate whether the author has deeply analyzed and explained the results. In addition, reviewers will also check whether the author has discussed possible limitations and future research directions.

4. Structure and organization: The reviewer will evaluate whether the structure of the paper is clear and whether each part is logical. An unorganized paper will be difficult for readers to understand and will also affect the quality of the paper.

5. Writing quality: The reviewer will check the writing quality of the paper, including basic elements such as grammar, spelling and punctuation. In addition, reviewers will also evaluate whether the language of the paper is clear and accurate, and whether it can clearly convey the author's point of view.

6. Citations and references: The reviewer will check whether the citations in the paper are accurate and the references are complete. A paper without correct citations and references may make readers doubt the author's professional level.

7. Meet the requirements of the journal: the reviewer will also check whether the paper meets the format and content requirements of the journal. If the paper does not meet the requirements of the journal, it may be rejected.