Paradox theory of baldness (homophonic "quilt"): A person with 654.38+ ten thousand hairs is certainly not bald. A person who is not bald is still not bald without a hair. According to this principle, if a person without baldness reduces his hair one by one, he will come to the conclusion that baldness without hair is not baldness!

The reason for this paradox is that we use fuzzy concepts in strict logical reasoning. What is baldness? This is a vague concept. Not a hair. And baldness, of course. How about another one? Still bald. Such an increase one by one, how can one not be bald? It's hard to say, nobody has a clear standard!