In fact, when the "Yu Huan case" happened, it caused a sensation in society. The public sympathized with this "mother-insulting case" and stood on the side of Huan, and I was no exception. This is called a case that reflects too much. For example, in the first instance, everything is handled in accordance with the cold legal provisions. Yu Huan killed someone, for whatever reason, and was punished according to the law. However, considering the particularity of the case, I think that the simplicity and justice of public opinion should have normal space in legal channels, leave necessary space for normal human relations, and also consider the mental pain caused by humiliating one's mother face to face. Such a judgment is bound to be recognized by more people. I think Yu Huan thought so, so she appealed.
? With the verdict of the second trial today, I feel the fairness and justice of the law in this judicial case. This paper expounds that although the law is cold, its spirit is warm, which shows the conflict between the behavior regulated by law and the behavior required by ethics, and reflects the ethical scene in the case and the face-up to ethics in the rule of law. This also reflects the development trend of the relationship between logic and experience, articles and human feelings, law and ethics in the construction of rule of law in China during the transition period.
? In my opinion, the verdict in the second instance of Yu Huan's case is not only the victory of Yu Huan in the dispute between law and ethics, but also the result of the reconciliation between law and human ethics. If this is not the case, only based on the results of the first instance, then the law is really too cold. For whatever reason, everything is pronounced according to rigid legal provisions. What is the difference between this and the so-called king law in feudal society?