At least reach the minimum number of words, otherwise you will definitely lose points, and you can't exceed too many. One or two lines should be fine.

For the majority of candidates who take the civil service examination, it is more difficult to apply. The difficulty is that candidates don't know what kind of articles are in line with the examiner's approval criteria. This shows the confusion of applying for the exam.

Examples With the given materials, with the topic "Protecting and rescuing street children is the common responsibility of the government and society", write an argumentative essay of more than 800 words from a self-made topic and a self-selected perspective.

grading standards

1, no matter from which point of view, it must conform to "protecting and rescuing street children is the common responsibility of the government and society", which is closely related to the materials given, closely combined with social life and self-knowledge, and embodies the characteristics of giving priority to reason and convincing people with reason.

2. In the specific writing, we can focus on both government responsibility and social responsibility, but no matter which one we focus on, we should give consideration to the other, reflecting the dialectical unity of the two.

3. Connecting with reality, making in-depth analysis and being well-founded; Strong organization, complete structure and fluent language; Write neatly, clearly and without typos.

Scoring rules

1, closely linked to "protecting and helping street children is the common responsibility of the government and society", and discussed with given materials and social reality.

2. It embodies the characteristics of giving priority to reason and convincing people with reason. The full text is based on theory, and there should be comments and explanations on viewpoints and countermeasures, which can be discussed in narrative way, but not in narrative way.

Pay attention to the judgment countermeasures article:

Countermeasures are a part of the article, and other parts of the full text are also discussed. No matter whether we discuss countermeasures or not, it can't be regarded as a countermeasure article.

The content of countermeasures takes up a lot of space, so the strategy should not only explain how to do it, but also explain why to do it, or what is the significance of doing it, or what is the positive effect of doing it and what is the negative effect of not doing it. This is the discussion.

If the main part of the full text is countermeasures, only a few dry words about the same responsibility, without analysis, explanation and discussion, it is an unqualified article.

3. The topic of "protecting and helping street children is the shared responsibility of the government and society" is very rich, but as long as it involves the shared responsibility, it is all related.

4. In-depth analysis and well-founded; Clear organization and complete structure; Fluent in language and neat in writing.

5. In the specific scoring, you can judge flexibly according to the detailed rules.

Five criteria for grading

Category I: 4 1-50.

The content is relevant, meets the requirements of the topic, and is targeted and dialectical. The argument is correct and insightful, the argument is full and powerful, the argument is rigorous, the content is comprehensive and substantial, the political discourse is clear and coherent, and the theory is the mainstay. Reflect the stylistic features of Shen Lun. The language is accurate and fluent, and the handwriting is neat and neat.

Top: It meets the overall content requirements of the evaluation standard and the requirements in the left column.

Next: qualitative relevance, meeting the requirements of the topic, appropriate content selection, prominent focus, clear point of view, strong logic, strong language expression ability, strong political style and innovative content.

Category II: 3 1-40.

The content is relevant, basically meets the requirements of the topic, and the discussion is targeted. The argument is correct, the content is more substantial, the political discussion is more specific, targeted, well-structured, the argument is clear, the expression is good, the language is fluent, and individual typos and sick sentences are allowed. The handwriting is clear and the surface is neat.

Above: To the point, the viewpoint is correct and the theory is the main one, but the discussion is concentrated and specific, which can be aimed at social life and one's own reality. The language is fluent, but there are also sentence errors and typos.

Next: to the point, the viewpoint is correct, but the main content is a little thin, with narration and discussion, but it is not based on theory, shallow discussion, fluent language, inaccurate words and sick sentences. The focus is on the countermeasures of government responsibility, but there are also countermeasures analysis and evaluation. Language seems to have lyrical elements, but it has political characteristics, and its content is more in line with the basic requirements.

Category III: 2 1-30.

The content is related to the topic and still meets the requirements of the topic. The viewpoint is clear, the discussion is in place, not deep enough, the structure is basically complete, the organization is clear, the language is not fluent enough, and there are many typos. The handwriting is not neat enough, and it is scrawled but can be recognized.

Above: Responsibility-related content can still be involved. The central point of view is clear, but the main content is scattered, the components are weak, the structure is complete, the organization is clear, and the language expression is general.

Bottom: You can also mention the meaning of * * * related to responsibility, which has a clear center and point of view, but the main content is scattered, or the overall content is single, focusing on how to perform, or the content involves the same responsibility, but it is a rigid countermeasure article, or the narrative language is poor.

The fourth category: 1 1-20 points.

The content is basically related, the theory lacks pertinence, the viewpoint is unclear, the thinking is unclear, there are too many false and empty rhetoric, the structure is incomplete and chaotic. Unclear organization, poor language expression and many typos; The roll surface is very poor, and the handwriting is illegible.

Above: the content involves the protection of street children, but it does not involve the responsibility angle; Or the main content digress, just a little to protect and rescue immediately avoided, talking about other content, changing the subject, poor structure and logic, individual politics "minor injuries", but the whole is ok.

Next: talk about street children, but the content is not responsibility, but other street children (Weibo abducted and begged children); More than half of the words are copied from the materials, with incomplete structure, unclear organization, poor language expression, many typos and scrawled handwriting.

Category V: below 10.

Content digression, misreading given data, or irrelevant to data content; The language expression of precast slab is poor and there is no chapter to follow; More than two-thirds of the words are copied from materials, or basically rewritten, abbreviated and pieced together into essays, poems and other publications, which is very political.

1. If the topic is not written, two points will be deducted.

2. If the number of words is less than 800 words, deduct 1 point for every 50 words, and deduct 2 points at most. Within 500 words, it is generally controlled below three types of volumes.

3, the full text is difficult to identify, according to the following three volumes.

4, typos have been divided into composition levels, no longer separate points.

The website of Chinese public education publishes all kinds of public examination information at the first time, and it is recommended to pay attention to it in time. I wish the exam success!

. com？ wt.mc_id=bd 10927

If in doubt, please consult the public education enterprises in China.