1. The principle and its universality revealed by the investigation or experimental results of the research object. The results of this study explain what problems, what laws are drawn, what theoretical or practical problems are solved, and their practical value or significance in theory or production and life.

2. Similarities and differences with previous research work. What tests have been made on the views of related issues before? It is consistent with the results of this study. What are the inconsistencies? What amendments, supplements, developments or negatives did the author make?

3. The shortcomings or problems left by this research. If there are any exceptions or problems that are difficult to explain or solve in this paper, further research suggestions can be put forward.

Types of conclusions

1. analysis and synthesis: analyze and summarize the main contents of the text and highlight the author's point of view.

2. Predicting the prospect: On the basis of the theory and viewpoint of text argumentation, push its value, significance and function to the future and foresee its vitality.

3. Comparison of facts: Compare the theories, viewpoints and facts expounded in this paper to form a conclusion.

4. Explanation: Further explain the theories and viewpoints expounded in this paper to make them clearer.

5. Asking questions: On the basis of analyzing the theories and viewpoints of text argumentation, the key questions related to the results of this study are put forward to be further solved.