(arts and sciences major)
Table 1: Nanchang university graduation thesis defense qualification examination table in 2009
Table 2: Review Form for Reviewer of Graduation Thesis of Nanchang University in 2009
Table 3: Nanchang University 2009 Undergraduate Thesis Defense Record Form
Table 4: Graduation Thesis Defense Scoring Table of Nanchang University's Grade 2009 Undergraduate Students.
Title:
Topic source: □ above the provincial level □ municipal level □ horizontal □ optional.
Nature of the subject: □ theoretical research □ application and theoretical research □ practical application research
College: Department:
Specialized courses:
Student Name: Student ID:
Lecturer: Title:
2009 system
Table 1: Nanchang university graduation thesis defense qualification examination table in 2009
Instruct teachers to check
Student graduation thesis
Content assignment □ Yes □ No Opening statement □ Yes □ No.
Text □ Completed □ Unfinished Words
English and Chinese abstract □ Yes □ No.
Translation of foreign language materials □ Yes □ No
Software and hardware acceptance □ completed □ unfinished
Attendance during graduation thesis, cumulative absenteeism.
Time day
Tutor's comments (explain whether you can reply, and evaluate the results as excellent, good, medium, pass and fail according to the quality of students' graduation thesis, and give the basis for evaluating the results):
Signature of Instructor: Position: College (Department):
Year, month and day achievements
Table 2: Review Form for Reviewer of Graduation Thesis of Nanchang University in 2009
The name, professional title and educational background of the reviewer are in the hospital (department).
The evaluation items are good, good and generally poor.
Select a title.
Quality 0 1 topic conforms to the professional training goal and embodies the basic requirements of comprehensive training.
02 topic difficulty
03 project workload
Theoretical significance or practical value
competence
Level 05 ability to access documents and materials
Comprehensive application of knowledge and ability
Design ability of 07 research scheme
Ability to use research methods and means
09 foreign language application ability
fruit
Quality 10 is consistent with the topic.
1 1 writing level
12 writing specification
13 length
The theoretical or practical value of 14 results
The originality of graduation thesis is □ partial quotation □ partial plagiarism □ plagiarism.
Evaluators' evaluation results (divided into excellent, good, medium, pass, fail, etc.). )
criticize
read
mankind
criticize
language
Auditor's signature: year month day.
Note: In principle, the reviewer should be a teacher with the title of associate professor or above other than the instructor. Under special circumstances, with the consent of the graduation thesis leading group of the college (department), the reviewer can be a teacher with the title of lecturer.
Table 3: Nanchang University 2009 Undergraduate Thesis Defense Record Form
I. Information of national defense experts
(thesis) (oral) defense Committee
(or joint defense team) member serial number name title unit (a: school; B: Off campus)
Second, the defense record.
Place and date of reply
Record content: 1. Elaborate the main points of graduation thesis II. Ask and answer questions.
Recorder:
Note: If there are multiple records, please attach a separate page.
Table 4: Graduation Thesis Defense Scoring Table of Nanchang University's Grade 2009 Undergraduate Students.
Instruct teachers to evaluate their achievements:
Instructor's signature:
date month year
Reviewers' assessment results:
Auditor's signature:
date month year
Opinions of the National Defense Commission:
Signature of member:,,,
Signature of Grade Director: Year Month Day
Hospital (Department) review comments:
Signature of the leader in charge of the comprehensive achievement institute (department): year month day.
criteria for evaluation
Achievement standard
Excellent can successfully complete the tasks specified in the task book, and have unique opinions and innovations in some aspects; The argument is correct, the content is complete and the text is clear; The calculation, analysis and demonstration are reliable and rigorous, and the conclusion is reasonable; Specifications and drawings, high quality; The completed software and hardware meet or exceed the specified performance indicators, and the documents are complete and standardized, or the results are of guiding significance to social development and economic construction; Strong ability to work independently; The concept is clear and the answer is correct.
Be good at completing the tasks specified in the task book; The argument is correct, the content is complete and the text is clear; The calculation, analysis and demonstration are basically correct and the conclusion is reasonable; Instructions and drawings conform to the specifications and are of high quality; The completed software and hardware basically meet the specified performance indicators, and the documents are complete and standardized, or the results have certain guiding significance for social development and economic construction; Have certain ability to work independently; The concept of defense is clear and you can answer the questions correctly.
The ability to basically complete the tasks specified in the task book is medium; The content is basically complete, there is no principled error in calculation and demonstration, and the conclusion is basically reasonable; The specifications and drawings are of average quality; The completed software and hardware can still reach the specified performance index; The documents are basically complete and basically conform to the specifications; The working ability has been improved; Can answer the main questions raised in the defense, and basically correct.
Pass the examination and basically complete the tasks specified in the task book; The quality of the paper is average, with some mistakes; Instructions and drawings are not complete enough; The performance of the completed software and hardware is poor; The defense is not clear enough, the answer to the question is inaccurate or there are some mistakes.
Did not complete the task specified in the task book; There are mistakes in principle in the paper; Poor quality of instructions and drawings; Plagiarism; The performance of the completed software and hardware is poor; The concept is not clear when defending.
Note: Each college (department) can also make its own grading rules according to the professional situation.