As long as we have a new perspective on the thesis and master's thesis, we must put forward new research viewpoints. In fact, the innovation of master's thesis should have graduates' own views or new views on arguments, and whether the thesis has innovative elements. Innovation is an important criterion to measure the value of master's thesis. If the innovation of the master's thesis is clear and valuable, it can pass the test unless there are other problems. . As long as they have a new view on the early research and write some creative papers in the research field with what they have learned, they can use it. We can rearrange the past literature, get inspiration from the arrangement, and also separate clues from critical literature; Careful observation can see the other side of things.

Choose a subject in the same direction as the tutor's study or a subject that you are good at. If this topic is repeated by professionals or other users, the value of the article will be greatly reduced. Whether the topic of the paper is appropriate. Whether the paper is standardized. This is one of the simplest supervision of students. In fact, this is an easy question to score. Especially, there are many problems in art graduation thesis. The most obvious problems are coding control, reference and coding management of serial numbers at all levels, and standardization of English format. Generally speaking, formats and standards can be rated as? Okay？ But most of them can be rated? Excellent? .

In principle, as long as you can master the direction related to your major and have a hot topic with strong practical value, the tutor will support it. In addition, the topic should be consistent with your professional level, and the scope of the topic should not be too large or too small.

As long as the structure is reasonable and the logic is clear, it can be called high quality and high level. . In the writing of master's thesis, what is commonly used? Total score -Total score? The structure of. In an actual document, the discussion must be discussed separately to prove its necessity. The structure of the article tends to present scattered and insufficient arguments. In each document, each sub-argument may not conform to the theme, but a general document based on the full text must be attached.