In the process of writing articles, revising articles and exchanging papers, I found that many times, our articles, especially papers, were written in a chaotic order, which others could not understand and readers' comments were logically confused.

Why?

Because, we will not use a simple writing order to describe our achievements.

What is a simple writing order?

The principle of the golden pagoda is systematically expounded.

This book is recommended by various knowledge media. After reading it, I found the content a bit boring. I discussed a simple truth over and over again.

However, I think it is necessary to mention an important method conveyed by this book in my thesis writing. This principle is the conclusion first.

Throw out personal opinions and important conclusions first. Writing a paper is to specify the general content of each part, so that others can understand the content of the article more easily. Writing your own opinions first can make people understand what to say next, and it won't be too confusing.

Put forward your own views first, discuss them separately, and summarize and echo them. This kind of writing is actually very simple, and we have all been exposed to it in primary school and high school. This is a very mature writing logic, and it also conforms to cognitive logic.

Specific analysis of specific problems. There are many types of writing, and each type has different writing methods. I think this method is more suitable for writing scientific papers, reporting materials and exchanging views. If you use it in the wrong place, it will be bad. A literary work, in this way, suddenly makes people feel full of preaching, which is not good.

In writing scientific papers, this method can be used in introduction and discussion. In the introduction, we describe a background problem, ask questions and explain the advanced nature of our research. In this process, each paragraph should be a model of viewpoint-example-conclusion (echoing the next paragraph). The discussion part is also such a model, which makes people clear at a glance.

Readers can grasp the author's point of view more quickly. Facing a new exploration, readers and commentators want to see what the author wants to express. Scientific papers are not essays or novels, and they want to grasp the most critical information at once. It is also for this reason that all articles should have abstracts.

Some gossip, ideas, continue to improve.