Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Translation and Original Text of Zhuangzi and Keiko You Haoliang
Translation and Original Text of Zhuangzi and Keiko You Haoliang
Zhuangzi and Keiko traveled in Haoliang, translating the original classical Chinese.

"Zhuangzi and Keiko Tour the Haojiang River" is an argumentative essay in "Zhuangzi Qiushui", which was written in the Warring States Period and tells a little argument between Zhuangzi and Keiko when they were playing on the Haoshui Bridge. The following is the original translation of Zhuangzi and Keiko You Haoliang that I collected for you. Welcome to reading.

Zhuangzi and Keiko You translated the original classical Chinese in Haoliang 1

Zhuangzi and Keiko are swimming in Haoliang.

Pre-Qin Dynasty: Anonymous

Zhuangzi and Keiko play together on Hao's bridge. Zhuangzi said, "Fish swim leisurely and have fun." Keiko said, "You are not a fish. How can you know that fish are happy?" ? Zhuangzi said, "You are not me. How do you know that I don't know that fish are happy?" " ? " Keiko said: "I am not a son, I really don't know my son;" Zigu is not a fish, but I don't know the joy of fish! " Zhuangzi said, "Please follow its source. Confucius said, "You know a lot about fish." He asked me because he knew what I knew. I know it very well. "

Translation and annotation

translate

Zhuangzi and Keiko play together on Haoshui Bridge. Zhuangzi said, "How leisurely fish swim in the river is the happiness of fish." Keiko said, "You are not a fish. How do you know that fish is happy? " Zhuangzi said, "You are not me. How do you know that I don't know that fish are happy? " Keiko said, "I'm not you, but I don't know you." You are not a fish in the first place, and you don't know the happiness of fish, which is completely certain. "Zhuangzi said," let's go back to the original topic. If you start asking me' where do you know the happiness of fish', it means that you know I know, so you ask me where I know. Now I tell you, I know it on Haoshui Bridge. "

To annotate ...

1. Haoliang: On the bridge of vast water. Hao, Mingshui, is now Fengyang, Anhui.

2. Calm: carefree.

2._ Fish: A silvery-white fish in freshwater fish, which likes to swim under the water layer and is about 16 cm long, also known as shad.

3. yes: this.

4. Solid: Of course; Originally.

5. Everyone: totally, definitely.

6. Follow the book: start with the original topic. Follow: follow. It's, the title. Ben: At first.

7. Confucius said "you know fish": you said "you know fish" and so on. An Ru Fish Joy: How do you know that fish are happy? Claude: Just so-so. Ann, how about it? Where is it?

8. security; Interrogative pronouns. Why? Where?

The Travel Notes of Zhuangzi and Keiko: The English Version of Hao Liang in Classical Chinese Part II

Zhuangzi and Keiko play together on Hao's bridge. Zhuangzi said, "Fish swim leisurely and have fun." Keiko said, "You are not a fish. How can you know that fish are happy?" ? Zhuangzi said, "You are not me. How do you know that I don't know that fish are happy?" " ? " Keiko said: "I am not a son, I really don't know my son;" Zigu is not a fish, but I don't know the joy of fish! " Zhuangzi said, "Please follow its source. Confucius said, "You know a lot about fish." He asked me because he knew what I knew. I know it very well. "

translate

Zhuangzi and Keiko play together on Haoshui Bridge. Zhuangzi said, "How leisurely fish swim in the river is the happiness of fish." Keiko said, "You are not a fish. How do you know that fish is happy? " Zhuangzi said, "You are not me. How do you know that I don't know that fish are happy? " Keiko said, "I'm not you, but I don't know you." You are not a fish in the first place, and you don't know the happiness of fish, which is completely certain. "Zhuangzi said," let's go back to the original topic. If you start asking me' where do you know the happiness of fish', it means that you know I know, so you ask me where I know. Now I tell you, I know it on Haoshui Bridge. "

To annotate ...

Haoliang: On the bridge of Haoshui. Hao, Mingshui, is now Fengyang, Anhui.

Calm: calm.

_ Fish: A silvery-white freshwater fish that likes to swim under the water. It is about 16 cm long, also known as shad.

Yes: this one.

Solid: of course; Originally.

Everyone: completely, definitely.

Follow the original: start with the original title.

Follow: follow. It's, the title.

Ben: At first. Confucius said, "You know a lot about fish."

Clouder: You said "you know a lot about fish" and so on.

An Ru Fish Joy: How do you know that fish are happy?

Claude: Just so-so. Ann, how about it? Where is it? Ann; Interrogative pronouns. Why, where.

Literary Chinese

polysemy

I don't know this child.

② Zigu is not a fish.

One: ① the joy of knowing fish;

(2) Ask me what I know:

inverted sentence

Zhuangzi and Keiko are swimming on Haoliang.

Change Zhuangzi and Keiko to Haoliang for swimming.

Zhuangzi and Keiko are playing on Haoliang.

Judgement

The original sentence is the joy of fish.

This is the happiness of fish.

The original sentence is not fish.

You are not a fish.

The original sentence I know is also in the city.

Okay, I know it on the water bridge.

Problem inquiry

1. Zhuangzi thinks that "swimming" fish is very happy. What kind of mood did he show?

A: Zhuangzi thinks that the "happiness" of fish is actually the projection and externalization of his happy mood.

2. No matter who wins or loses, we can see the differences between Zhuangzi and Keiko in thought, character and temperament, and analyze their personalities.

A: Keiko likes to debate, and is good at analysis and cognition. Have a cognitive attitude towards things, focusing on the discussion of knowledge.

Zhuangzi argued wisely, attached importance to appreciation and held an artistic attitude towards things. For the understanding of the outside world, with an appreciative attitude, subjective goodwill is imposed on external things, resulting in empathy. If Keiko has the personality of a logician, then Zhuangzi has the style of an artist.

This argument has been debated for a long time. Who has the upper hand in this debate?

A: Logically speaking, Keiko has the upper hand. Because Zhuangzi is arguing irrationally; Formally speaking, Zhuangzi has the upper hand. Because after Zhuangzi said Keiko, there is nothing to refute.

4. What do you think of the relationship between Zhuangzi and Keiko?

A: Zhuangzi's broad-minded mind regards wealth and splendor as a lost thing. Its superb interest in life naturally transcends the crowd and the community. It is no wonder that in his eyes, "the world is heavy and turbid, and he does not talk to Zhuang." In this case, we have to "communicate with heaven and earth alone." It's really not easy for a talented person like Zhuangzi to find one or two confidants. I'm afraid there won't be any other friends besides Keiko. They are all argumentative essays, and their eloquence is extremely sharp; They are also very knowledgeable and have a strong passion for exploring knowledge.

Problem criticism

In recent years, some philosophers have expressed doubts about this. Because Zhuangzi only talks about his own experience, treating experience as knowledge shows his detached attitude, but it is harmful to understanding, because understanding and experience are two different things. Strictly speaking, Zhuangzi did not refute Hui Shi logically, but led the logic to the place where it could not reach, that is, everyone's inner experience at the moment. This is "like a fish drinking water, knowing it in cold and warm", which is inhuman. But since Zhuangzi used logical reasoning, he should apply it to the end. If I were Hui Shi, I would continue to ask: You said that you knew the happiness of fish when you were in Haoshang, but that was you just now, and now you are not you just now. How do you know that you just know the happiness of fish? For example, just now I don't know how I know you know the happiness of fish. In the face of such heckling, I don't think Zhuangzi will say anything more. If he loses in language, he is deprived of the right to speak, but he may not think he lost in his heart. As long as he tells his inner experience, he will always be the winner. But I'm afraid no one will really be such a winner, because a person who doesn't agree with himself at another moment will no longer be a person or even nothing. Maybe Zhuangzi's real intention is to say that people are nothingness, but he can never say that, because once he says it, he will be "yes". In fact, even pure inner experience, even silence, takes time, and once you enter time, you will "be" something, and you will be able to "say" it with words and logic. So just mentioning the difference between you just now and you now completely cancels Zhuangzi's right to speak.

Distinguish and appreciate

This article is taken from Autumn Water.

Autumn Water is another long story in Zhuangzi. The first two words are titled, and the center is to discuss how people should know foreign things. The whole article consists of two parts. The first part describes the dialogue between Poseidon and the river god in Beihai, which is the main part of this paper. Six fables are written in the second half, each of which is self-contained and unrelated, and has no structural connection with the dialogue between Poseidon and the river god in the previous part, which is of little help to the expression of the whole theme and appears detached.

Zhuangzi and Keiko swim in Haoliang, relaxed and poetic. Discuss Tao with strength and discuss Tao with technology; One is seeking truth, the other is seeking beauty; One is rigid, the other is detached; Let people smile and meditate for a long time after reading it.

Keiko is argumentative and analytical. Have a cognitive attitude towards things, focusing on the discussion of knowledge; Zhuangzi argued with wisdom and attached importance to appreciation. Have an appreciation attitude towards the outside world, impose subjective goodwill on external things, and produce empathy. If Keiko has the personality of a logician, then Zhuangzi has the style of an artist.

Translation and Original Text of Zhuangzi and Huizi Hao Liang Hang

Original text:

Zhuangzi and Keiko are great because of Liang. Zhuangzi said, "Fish swim leisurely and have fun." Keiko said, "You are not a fish. How can you know that fish are happy?" ? Zhuangzi said, "You are not me. How do you know that I don't know that fish are happy?" " ? " Keiko said: "I am not a child, so I don't know myself;" Zigu is not a fish, but I don't know the joy of fish! " Zhuangzi said, "Please follow its source. Confucius said,' You know a lot about fish.' If you know what I know, ask me. I know it very well. "

Translation:

Zhuangzi and Hui Shi are playing on Haoshui Bridge. Zhuangzi said: "How leisurely the white fish swims in the river is the happiness of the fish." Hui Shi said, "If you are not a fish, how do you know the happiness of the fish?" Zhuangzi said, "If you are not me, how do you know that I don't know the happiness of fish?" Hui Shi said: "I am not you, although I don't know you;" You are not a fish, you don't know the happiness of fish, that's for sure! " Zhuangzi said, "Please start from our original topic. You said something like' Where do you know fish are happy', which means that you already know that I know fish are happy and are asking me. You'll know it on Haoshui Bridge. "

Translation and Original Text of Zhuangzi and Keiko You Haoliang

Zhuangzi and Keiko are swimming in Haoliang. Zhuangzi said: "It is a pleasure for small fish to wander around." Keiko said, "You are not a fish. How can you know that fish are happy?" ? Zhuangzi said, "You are not me. How do you know that I don't know that fish are happy?" " ? "

Keiko said: "I am not a son, I really don't know my son;" Children are not fish, children don't know the happiness of fish, everything! " Zhuangzi said, "Please follow its source. Confucius said,' You know a lot about fish.' If you know what I know, ask me. I know it very well. "

Zhuangzi and Keiko play together on Haoshui Bridge. Zhuangzi said, "How leisurely the little fish swim in the river is the happiness of the fish. Keiko said, "You are not a fish. How do you know that fish are happy? "? Zhuangzi said, "You are not me. How do you know I didn't know fish were happy?

Keiko said, "I'm not you, but I don't know you." You are not a fish in the first place, and you don't know the happiness of fish, which is completely certain. "Zhuangzi said," please go back to the original settings. When you say' where do you know that fish is happy', it means that you know that I know, so you ask me where I know. Now I tell you, I know it on Haoshui Bridge. "

"Zhuangzi and Keiko Traveling to Ba Liang" is an argumentative essay in Zhuangzi Qiushui, an external article of Zhuangzi in the Warring States Period, which describes a small debate between Zhuangzi and Keiko when they were playing on Ba Shui Bridge.

Extended data

Zhuangzi and Keiko swim in Haoliang, relaxed and poetic. Discuss Tao with strength and discuss Tao with technology; One is seeking truth, the other is seeking beauty; One is rigid, the other is detached; Let people smile and meditate for a long time after reading it.

This article is about two experts in debate, swimming together on a bridge in Haoshui, watching minnows swim freely, which aroused association and started a debate about whether people can know the happiness of fish. Although the topic is small, the purpose is great.

Except for the first sentence, narrative language is used to explain the background of the story, and the whole story is in the form of dialogue. The method of attacking the shield with the spear of the child really deepens the debate. Zhuang Zhou was sure that he could know the happiness of fish, but Hui Shi denied Zhuang Zhou's statement. Not to mention who is right or wrong in this debate, just the agile thinking and wise talk reflected by the two people in the debate makes people shocked and gives people an enjoyable and educational enjoyment.

Zhuang Zhou was sure that he could know the happiness of fish, but Hui Shi denied Zhuang Zhou's statement. Not to mention who is right or wrong in this debate, just the agile thinking and wise talk reflected by the two people in the debate makes people shocked and gives people an enjoyable and educational enjoyment.