You can briefly summarize the main contents of the paper, including experimental methods, experimental results and conclusions, and then make various evaluations. For example, what research methods are used and what this paper studies, the results show that. This paper is novel in topic selection and advanced in method, which has strong practical value and significance. In the research at the same level at home and abroad, it is standardized, organized and organized.

It is best not to have strong feelings when reviewing manuscripts. Even if you feel good as the responsible editor of that manuscript, try to restrain yourself and make an objective evaluation of your manuscript in a slightly relaxed tone. The advantage of this is: leave room for the editor-in-chief When he doesn't agree with you, he won't resent your "extreme", but also leave room for himself. In case the manuscript is shot, he won't be hit by too many emotions.

Matters needing attention in writing peer review opinions:

In view of the contents and results in the article, point out its specific shortcomings and talk about my own views. The article has three shortcomings. The first is that the results of the paper are incorrect or there are major mistakes, the second is that the paper lacks important results, and the third is that the results of the paper are not perfect.

Generally, at least three articles should be written to write peer review opinions, briefly describing the research content and significance of the paper, and making comments. Give affirmation to its better parts, point out its specific shortcomings according to the contents and results in the article, and talk about your views. The shortcomings of the article include giving your comprehensive evaluation, accepting, modifying or rejecting.