The Spring Festival Gala has been held for 30 years. Every New Year's Eve, China people will enjoy the richest "cultural feast". It can be said that the Spring Festival Evening brings together the best cultural forms, contents and artists in China. However, in recent years, the Spring Festival Gala has been constantly complained, and it has gone from bad to worse. The audience complained that there was no innovation and the jokes were boring. It seems that the Spring Festival Gala has been far away from the aesthetic concept of Chinese people. Although there were no advertisements and chorus in this year's the Year of the Loong Spring Festival Gala, the overall performance was still unsatisfactory. Let's just say that language programs, such as sketches and cross talk, should have been the characteristics of China, but there are only seven programs this year, half less than last year's 14. The director of the Spring Festival Gala in the Year of the Loong said, "There is no market for sketch and crosstalk in China." This sentence seems strange at first glance, but it is true when you think about it. Sketches and cross talk were originally built on vulgar culture. Their task is not only to make the audience laugh, but to satirize the reality in this joke and make the audience think after laughing. But what about now? Lack of content and innovation are jokes without nutrition. The audience laughed after reading it, but what are they laughing at? Nobody knows. Even on a stage like the Spring Festival Gala, only a few things are moved around. Sketches and crosstalk have lost their original functions, just to make the audience laugh more on New Year's Eve. After all, it is better to make the audience laugh than cry. Coupled with the popularity of the Internet, performing a large number of jokes is inevitably suspected of plagiarism. Should we say that netizens have strong imagination or that many cultural workers lack innovation ability? More should be the latter. In this way, language programs really can't cater to the appetite of the current audience, and they are also deviating from the original purpose. What is there to see in such a work? It's best to search for posts online.
Let's talk about the film market that has made great contributions to the cultural industry. 20 1 1 year, the box office of the film market broke1300 million, with more than 200 domestic films and about 50 imported films. But I believe that among the 654.38+0.3 billion,
At least half of them are imported from 50 countries. At the end of the year, many TV channels, newspapers and online media are taking stock of the 20 1 1 China film market. In addition to the moderate comments of CCTV, other media unanimously criticized last year's domestic films. Lack of innovation in theme, poor plot and poor technology are all reasons why domestic films get bad reviews. What's the use of asking big-name stars to shoot with 3D technology and spending hundreds of millions of dollars on production? If the plot doesn't go up, everything else is just a cloud. But with the fame of stars and directors and the support of hype, these plots can earn a lot of money as long as they add fragrance to the audience's movies. In fact, most people should have spent money and shouted "cheated" after watching the movie. Because the market in China is too big, no one wants to let it go. In order to get the maximum profit, there are not a few people who have invited stars to make a fuss. It seems that the phrase "only quantity without quality" is being staged by major directors and actors. China's films are not written, directed and acted with heart. How can we defeat the powerful Hollywood? 20 1 1 is the top three at the box office. Unfortunately, there are no China films, and the China films at the International Film Festival are only shown. I have read a statistic that 90% of domestic movies are losing money. I don't understand. Since we have lost money, why haven't the directors and screenwriters changed anything? Everyone is also happy to stage such irresponsible things as "I directed the bad film and the audience paid the bill". Do we have to wait until the audience reviles us? But I think the director has gone to Hawaii to enjoy his old age. Domestic films urgently need to correct their concepts and get on the right track.
The above two examples are just one or two of the cultural industries, but this is not a case. In fact, culture has been distorted since it was valued by the state as an industry. Why not? Because in China, a country where most people put interests first, as long as money is involved, people will do whatever it takes to get it. Coupled with the continuous support of the state, these people do whatever they want. It used to be industry, food and manufacturing, but now it is another culture. These things are no longer pure, and it is difficult for people to find real art recently. Isn't it sad that China, an economic power, has no real culture to support it? There is a good joke. Someone asked German Chancellor Thatcher, "China's TV sets are sold to Germany in large quantities. What should we do? " Thatcher smiled and said, "That's nothing. If one day many TV programs in China lose to the Germans, we will discuss what to do. " This joke has fully explained the degree of cultural distortion in China today. If we don't correct our values and pay attention to protecting our traditional culture, we will eventually be hurt by foreign cultures.