Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Do the opinions of external review of papers have to be revised?
Do the opinions of external review of papers have to be revised?
In the process of blind evaluation, as long as 1 expert's evaluation opinion is "inconsistent with the defense opinion", this dissertation will fail in blind evaluation. Under normal circumstances, graduate students should revise their dissertations according to experts' opinions under the guidance of their tutors, and each opinion should be comprehensively revised sentence by sentence. If they don't make changes, it will still be very troublesome and severe to be asked by the defense experts.

Recently, it's time for graduate thesis to be submitted for review. All the students' papers have been handed in, so many people must have received feedback from their own papers. Under normal circumstances, two or three experts will make blind comments. Although some papers are passed as a whole, some suggestions for revision will be put forward.

If the external auditor questions the problems existing in the experimental design, or lacks the means of data processing, such as lack of statistical analysis, lack of some contents of this paper, lack of discussion, etc. These viewpoints are common problems in graduation thesis, and will be pointed out in the defense if they are not revised.

In fact, papers that are blindly reviewed and defended are not final papers, because they all need to be revised. If experts give their opinions on the topic of the article, they can communicate with the tutor first, and then consider whether to revise it according to the requirements of each school.

Finally, solemnly declare that the opinions of blind trial must be carefully revised. Even if the second trial is passed, the defense will fail! Don't take chances!