I don't know. Generally, it has to go through a process, and basically it has to be revised once. It takes months to go back and forth. The following questions about review time may be helpful to you, but there is really no fastest time.

Peer review time of academic papers

The author of the paper will have such confusion. Every minute of the waiting time after the paper is submitted is suffering, and he is not sure what the evaluation result is. The long wait has also puzzled many authors. In fact, audit is the decisive work in editing work, and this link takes time, which is what we often call the audit cycle.

So what kind of process is the generation of review time? How long does each link take? This is what we want to share with you today.

Although the review process of foreign authoritative academic journals is relatively strict, the review cycle is generally not very long. Review time consists of editor's preliminary review time, reviewer's review time and editor's comment time.

Edit the first trial time

When your manuscript is submitted to a magazine, the editor will review it as necessary to see if it conforms to the principle of running a magazine. Editors can directly reject manuscripts that do not conform to the principles, which is also to reduce the burden on reviewers. There is also a need to look at the fields involved in the manuscript, so as to find reviewers in this field to review the manuscript. Generally speaking, the editor-in-chief will arrange the deputy editor-in-chief to look for reviewers, and some editors will look for reviewers directly. The initial review time for editing is generally 1-2 weeks. Under special circumstances, such as legal holidays and editor's business trip, the review time will be longer.

Review time of the reviewer

The review cycle at this stage is relatively long, accounting for almost half of the whole review cycle. Under normal circumstances, the time for magazine review is generally 2-3 weeks for the newsletter and 3-4 weeks for the full text. However, since reviewers have only obligations and no responsibilities, if this time is exceeded, editors can only urge them. If the reviewer has not reviewed the manuscript, the editorial department may find another reviewer. In this case, the time for reviewing the manuscript will be particularly long.

It's time for the editorial department to express its opinions.

After the reviewers' opinions are fed back to the editorial department, if 2-3 reviewers agree, the editor's conclusion will be better. If not, the editor has the right to make a decision. If the editor can't decide, he may have to go to the reviewer for arbitration again, which will make the review time much longer. The editorial department usually gives opinions within 1 week.

The review cycle of different journals is different, and too long review time is definitely unfavorable to some authors, such as mathematical papers, so the length of review cycle is also one of the factors that authors consider when choosing contributing journals.

Reference: Tips for Polishing Charlesworth's Paper/