Guide: For many people's academic path, they can go to graduate school or even continue to study for a doctorate after graduation. Therefore, the graduation requirements for doctoral degrees are very high, and many universities, such as Shanghai Jiaotong University and Da Gui University, have announced that they will cancel the requirement of doctoral thesis publication. What impact will such a move have on doctoral training?

First, reduce the pressure of doctoral thesis because for many doctors, when they graduate, there is an important assessment basis, that is, the number of papers they published. This paper doesn't mean that you can publish your paper anywhere. You must publish your papers in international journals and journals recognized by academic circles, not just one, but many. As a result, many doctors are under great pressure during their doctoral studies, and the doctoral study time is very long. Most doctors can't keep appointments as scheduled, and many of them have to be postponed. Such a mechanism is very unfavorable to the development of doctors. Therefore, many universities have learned from their mistakes at this time and decided to improve the academic status of doctors, instead of asking doctors to judge whether they can graduate only according to the number of published papers.

Second, the criteria for doctoral graduation are diversified. In fact, many colleges and universities choose to judge whether doctors can graduate according to the number of papers published by doctors, in order to make their evaluation criteria more concise. If the requirement of publishing papers is cancelled, it means that the evaluation criteria of the formula are more diversified. Many foreign doctoral tutors decide whether a doctoral student can graduate. As long as the doctoral supervisor thinks that the doctor is doing so well, the doctor can graduate. Although Jiao Tong and Da Gui said that they canceled the requirement of publishing doctoral dissertations, they also put forward some norms for doctoral graduation, hoping that they would not make something good, but should be innovative to a certain extent. If they don't publish papers, they should also make achievements.

Third, it is actually beneficial, as long as the graduation criteria of the doctor are not based on the papers he published. Then the development direction of doctors and all kinds of new talents will appear, which is actually beneficial, but it still depends on each school to establish corresponding systems to supplement it.