Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - What does the title mean?
What does the title mean?
Question 1: What does the title mean? In many countries, the products of multinational companies are becoming more and more important. This trend is seriously affecting our quality of life.

Question 2: What does the paper description mean? 15 paper description is a brief introduction to the paper, which gives people a general understanding of your paper background and so on.

Question 3: What is a project report? That is, what topic you choose, write a general outline yourself and the teacher will check it for you. Is it worth studying? Is it worth studying? Is the previous research rotten? Is the topic too big or too small? Do you have the ability to finish this research by yourself? (Personal opinion, for reference only)

Question 4: What is the difference between the central argument and the topic? Thank you. To judge what the central argument of an article is, we must consider the nature and characteristics of the argument and its relationship with other contents, from which we can sum up five bases for confirming the central argument, so as to help us accurately grasp the central argument of the article. These five bases are as follows: (1) According to the definition of argument, argument is the author's opinion and proposition on the issue under discussion, so the central argument in the article must be positive or negative. For example, "I advocate reforming the learning method and learning system of our whole party" ("reforming our learning"), "The death of the Six Kingdoms is not the disadvantage of soldiers, but the disadvantage of not being good at fighting" (Su Xun's On the Six Kingdoms), and "Whatever you do, you need to be just right" ("just right"), all of which clearly express the author's views and opinions. When analyzing and grasping the central argument of an argumentative essay, we can first make clear what the author wants to discuss according to the definition of the argument, and then see what views and opinions the author puts forward on the discussed issues. (2) According to the characteristics of the sentence expressing the central argument, the central argument is the author's opinion and proposition, so the sentence expressing the central argument should generally be a judgment sentence. Mastering this feature can help us find the central argument as soon as possible. For example, the central arguments of the above three cases are syntactically consistent with this feature. We emphasize that the central argument is generally expressed by a judgment sentence in order to eliminate the wrong judgment of the center as soon as possible. Some people often mistakenly take the topic as an argument, such as learning from individuals and groups, seeking truth from facts and lofty ideals. Where do our correct ideas come from? In these texts, the title is usually considered as an argument. In fact, they only have one word, some coordinate phrases and some interrogative sentences, all of which just indicate the scope of discussion. They are just topics, and can't express the author's views and opinions as clearly as judgment sentences, so they are not arguments. Verb-object phrases as the title can be both a topic and an instruction center, such as "opposing stereotyped Party writing" and "transforming our study", and that is only because they can be supplemented and rewritten as the judgment sentence of the expression center. If there are relatively complete expressions in the text, it is still necessary to make sure that the complete expressions in the text are the center and take the brief description of the title as a hint. When we say that the sentence feature of expressing the central argument "should generally be a judgment sentence", we not only affirm that in most argumentative essays, the author uses this sentence to express his views directly and clearly, but also can use it as one of the bases to help confirm the central argument. At the same time, we should also see that although some argumentative papers have a clear center, they are not expressed in complete judgment sentences or directly express the head words. To understand the center of this kind of article, readers are required to supplement the judgment sentence of the expression center according to the content after reading, or summarize its central argument with judgment sentence. For example, in the article Yi Li, Textual Research and Zhang Ci, several points of its central argument are described by three subheadings, which are very clear. When grasping the central arguments of this article, we should sum them up into judgment sentences containing these points, such as "writing an article should be considered from three aspects: Yi Li, textual research and Zhang Ci, and the viewpoints and materials should be unified, accurate and in good form". As can be seen from the above, it is very important to identify the center or inductive center with the sentence characteristics of the judgment sentence that expresses the central argument. (3) According to the common position of the arguments, the central argument has its common position in the article. Some of them put forward the central argument at the beginning of the article and then demonstrate it. This is the case with the article "Transforming Our Learning". Some are at the end of the introduction. In the first paragraph of Jane and Fanyi, the concept connotation is first clarified, and finally the central argument is drawn: "Jane and Fanyi have their own advantages and disadvantages." The central argument of some articles is at the beginning of this part. Most of these articles are written in a way of breaking first and then standing. The introduction part breaks through the problems existing in reality, and then puts forward the author's positive opinions and opinions in this part. For example, in the introduction, the author first criticized and exposed the essence and harm of "taking away", and then put forward the view that cultural heritage should be treated as "taking away" at the beginning of this part. The arguments of some articles appear at the end of the article. For example, in Jia Yi's On Qin, on the basis of the above analysis and elaboration, the author finally said: "... without benevolence and righteousness, the offensive and defensive trends are different." ......& gt& gt