Papers often refer to articles used to conduct scientific research and describe scientific research results. It's not just a means to discuss problems and conduct scientific research. What are the strategies for writing professional papers?
Broadly speaking, all works that discuss the contents of science and technology are called scientific works, such as original works (papers), briefings, comprehensive reports, progress reports, literature reviews, reviews, monographs, compilations, textbooks, popular science books and so on. However, only the original work and its introduction are original, major and primary, involving inventions and other intellectual property rights. Others are of course important, but they are all processed, developed and written for specific application purposes and objects. The following is only about the writing of the paper. When discussing thesis writing, I'm not going to talk about various rules and regulations about manuscript writing. What I mainly talk about is the problems and experiences that are easy to appear in thesis writing, and it is the standardization of thesis writing ethics and writing content.
First, the requirements of thesis writing
The following are described in turn according to the structural order of the paper.
(1) Thesis Title Scientific papers have problems, don't they? Untitled The topic of the thesis is generally about 20 words. The size of the topic should be consistent with the content, with no subtitle, 1 report and secondary report as far as possible. Thesis topics are all in a direct narrative tone, without exclamation marks and question marks, and scientific and technological paper topics cannot be written as advertisements or news reports.
(2) Scientific papers signed by papers should be signed with real names and real work units. Mainly reflects the responsibility and achievement attribution, which is convenient for future generations to follow up. Strictly speaking, the author of the paper refers to the person who is responsible for the whole process of the paper, such as topic selection, argumentation, literature review, scheme design, compilation method, experimental operation, data arrangement, induction and summary, writing, etc., and should be the person who can answer the relevant questions of the paper. Nowadays, people who take part in the work are often listed, so they should be arranged according to the contribution. The signature of the paper should be recognized by myself. According to the actual situation, academic tutors can be listed as paper authors or general thanks. Administrative leaders generally do not sign their names.
(3) The introduction of the paper is fascinating and significant, so it should be written well. A good paper introduction can often let readers know the development of your work and its position in this research direction. The basis, foundation, background and research purpose of the thesis. It is necessary to review the necessary literature and state the development of the problem. Use concise words.
(4) Materials and Methods: Write out the experimental objects, equipment, animals and reagents and their specifications truthfully, and write out the experimental methods, indicators and judgment standards. And write the experimental design, grouping, statistical methods, etc. These can be done in accordance with the magazine's submission rules.
(5) The experimental results of this paper should be highly summarized, carefully analyzed and presented logically. We should choose the best from the rough, discard the false and retain the true, but we should not make subjective choices because it does not meet our own intentions, let alone resort to deceit. Only the data obtained in the period of unskilled technology or unstable instrument, technical failure or operational error, and data obtained when experimental conditions are not met can be discarded. Moreover, when problems are found, the reasons must be indicated on the original records, and it is not allowed to eliminate them at will due to anomalies during summary processing. When discarding this kind of data, we should discard the experimental data under the same conditions at the same time, not just those that are not what we want.
The arrangement of experimental results should be closely related to the theme, and some data may not be suitable for this paper and can be used for other purposes. Don't cram it into a paper. Articles should use technical terms as much as possible. Don't use charts for those who can use tables, and it is best not to use charts for those who can use tables, so as not to occupy more space and increase the difficulty of typesetting. Words, tables and charts do not repeat each other. Special circumstances such as accidental phenomena and unexpected changes in the experiment should be explained as necessary and should not be discarded at will.
(6) Discussion is the key and difficult point of this paper. We should look at the overall situation, grasp the main controversial issues, and discuss from perceptual knowledge to rational knowledge. It is necessary to analyze and reason the experimental results instead of repeating them. We should focus on the achievements and opinions in the relevant literature at home and abroad, and show our own views, especially the opposing views. In the discussion of the paper, you can put forward ideas and ideas about the development of this topic, but you should be appropriate and not write? Science fiction? Or? Imagine? .
(VII) Conclusion or Conclusion The conclusion of the paper should write clear and reliable results and conclusive conclusions. The text of the paper should be concise and can be written item by item. Don't use it to summarize? Vague words like this.
(8) Reference and dedication of the paper This is a very important and problematic part of the paper. The purpose of listing the references of the thesis is to let readers know the ins and outs of the research proposition of the thesis, to facilitate the search, and to respect the work of predecessors and to have an accurate positioning of their own work. So there are both technical problems and scientific moral problems here.
A paper has references that need to be cited almost from beginning to end. For example, the most important and directly related documents should be cited in the introduction of the paper; In terms of methods, the methods adopted or used for reference should be cited; In the results, it is sometimes necessary to quote data to compare with literature; In the discussion, various supporting or contradictory results or viewpoints related to the paper should be cited.
Completely careless, do not check the literature; Deliberately not quoting, boasting innovation; Degrade others and raise yourself; It's wrong to pose lightly while avoiding weight. However, this phenomenon still appears from time to time in many papers, which should be regarded as a taboo for researchers. Among them, mistakes such as not consulting documents, omitting important documents, deliberately not quoting other people's documents or deliberately belittling other people's work are obvious and easy to find. Some practices are subtle, such as introducing what should be in the introduction and introducing it into the discussion. This will be the basis or forerunner of your thesis, and put it on an equal footing with your thesis. For another example, scientific research always develops in depth, and your work always develops on the basis of previous work. The correct writing should be, what did someone do on this topic in a certain year, and what did someone do on this basis in a certain year? Now I have finished this research on the basis of them. This is an attitude of seeking truth from facts, and this expression will not harm your contribution at all. Some authors don't say this, but say that someone did this problem for a year and didn't do it for a year, and now I have done it. This is not a realistic attitude. This can sometimes fool some laymen who don't know the truth, but only one insider needs to poke it, and the paper tiger will be broken, and the result will be self-defeating and lose credibility. This phenomenon is not uncommon in real life.
(9) Directors, technical assistants, providers of special reagents or equipment, funders and those who put forward important suggestions are all thanked. Paper thanks should be sincere and true, not vulgar. Don't thank the professor in general, and don't just thank others. Before writing a paper to thank you, you should get the consent of the person being thanked, and you should not pull the banner into a tiger skin.
(10) Abstract or abstract: Briefly summarize the full text of the paper in about 200 words. Always put the first one. The abstract of the paper needs to be carefully written and attractive. Let the reader read the abstract of the paper just like seeing the miniature of the paper, or want to continue reading the relevant parts of the paper after reading the abstract of the paper. In addition, several key words should be given, and the key words should be written in real key academic vocabulary, not in general terms.
Second, the key to writing a good paper
(1) Writing materials, viewpoints and words of the paper
Materials are the basis of writing a good paper, opinions are the soul of the paper, and words are the external expression of the paper. Materials and opinions are the content of the paper, and words are the form of the paper. Form is the expression of content, and content should be expressed through form. The perfect combination of the three is the unity of content and form.
The materials come from experiments. The quality of design directly affects the efficiency and quality of material acquisition. The whole paper consists of several work units, and each work unit is accumulated from each experimental material. So be kind to daily experiments. Every day, we should consider the possible position of this data in future papers, and carefully collect and save every image record. The materials should be true and reliable, and the data should be sufficient. If there is any abnormality, it should be analyzed and handled in time to ensure the credibility of the obtained results and eliminate the illusion. There are always new phenomena, new treatments, new effects and new viewpoints in a paper.
;