There are mainly two kinds of structural problems: the first is only theoretical analysis, from theory to theory, lacking necessary and sufficient examples and figures; The second is that there are many materials, but they are not good at selecting materials and organizing materials, and lack strict logic. The second question is easy to appear in many graduation thesis, which is generally manifested in the following aspects.

(1) Ignore? The requirements for novel material selection are outdated, and some familiar old examples are used, which lacks freshness and attraction.

(2) You can't selectively use typical and refined materials to form your own opinions. The examples are scattered, and I haven't sorted out my argument angle and the beginning of the next pen.

(3) The argument lacks typicality and necessity, and the conclusion is different from a large number of facts in a specific environment only by some facts that rarely happen, so the argument is unconvincing.

(4) After putting forward arguments and listing arguments, use them without in-depth analysis or even any analysis, without going through the argumentation process? So a lot of facts prove that? And other statements, thus withholding the arguments put forward.

(5) Generalize the whole with partiality, replace the surface with points, and support the big argument with small arguments. The argument is insufficient. Did you commit a crime? Can't push it out? problem

(6) the focus is not clear, the focus is not prominent, or there is no necessary connection between the arguments, and the two are either out of touch or contradictory. The introduction is unfounded? The reason is that there is no real understanding of concepts and facts. ：

(7) When analyzing problems, do not proceed from reality, but draw conclusions from the analysis of facts; Instead, set an example with ideas and prove your point of view with facts.

(8) There are contradictions between the front and back arguments, the central arguments and the sub-arguments, or they avoid problems or make subjective assumptions. The analysis is not objective and there is no need for full argumentation.

(9) Single structure, lack of hierarchy, thousands of words of content, no sequence code or subtitle, difficult to read, or disjointed from beginning to end, lacking integrity.

The above is the related content of Bian Xiao's thesis writing structure of Global Ivy League, hoping to be helpful to the friends who are about to graduate. For more related content, welcome to pay attention to this platform!