Yes, in reply.

But pay attention to three points.

There are several things you must keep in mind in the reply to the revision of Sci papers. If you don't do it well, your article may be "strangled" in your own hands. The following small series will tell you which problems you must not ignore.

First of all, everyone seems to like to start with "Dear Editor" when modifying the reply title of sci papers. Although there is nothing wrong with this general format, if you use "Dear Dr. XX", the editor will be happier, because scholars care more about their academic level than editors, so paying attention to the title will add a lot to your letter. Secondly, the reply must be detailed. What are the detailed standards? One principle is that even if the reviewer doesn't read the revised manuscript, he can directly know what you have changed by reading the letter. All the revised contents should correspond to the meaning of the revised opinions and be marked on the letter. Even if the opinions of two reviewers are repeated, they should be answered separately. Don't bother. If there are many changes in the sci paper, you can put a few big changes in the letter. The last point is to reply seriously, and even the smallest questions should be carefully revised and answered. If your reply letter is not carefully written, the editor will definitely doubt the quality of your article.

In short, when revising the sci thesis defense, we must pay attention to the topic, details and seriousness. Although the final acceptance depends on the quality of the article, the revised reply also accounts for a certain amount.