The possibility is the same as when you first submitted your paper. Generally, the paper will go through two rounds of review, preliminary review and review, and you will be given opinions after two rounds of review. If the advice given to you is to modify it, you can modify it as required. At this time, your thesis has basically been hired. But after the revision, you have to go through the editor's review of the format. Editors generally don't brush, just adjust the publication time of your paper. If the theme of your paper is similar to that of the paper recently submitted to the magazine, the publication time of your paper may be delayed, and of course, if you write well, it may be advanced. Similarly, the topic of your paper is novel, and you can also publish it in advance.
Question 2: The status of the manuscript is approved, and no comments have been given? What does that mean? Personally, I think that the review of your journals should be divided into two steps: the first step is the preliminary examination; The second step is to review. Re-examination is an external review, which means that the external review gives a review opinion, and the editor will review the editor-in-chief according to the review opinion. Your results will be given in a few days: whether to withdraw from the class, reject the manuscript or hire directly, the evaluation is the final decision stage, and you will get the results after waiting patiently for a few days. If you are in a hurry, you can call the editorial department directly and ask if your manuscript has been hired, which is faster!
Question 3: What does it mean to change the manuscript status to "review"? There are two possibilities. One possibility is that two external audit experts were sent, and one of them failed to reply to the audit opinion after reviewing the manuscript for more than time, so he found a third expert to review the manuscript; Another possibility is that two external experts have come back to review the manuscript, but the opinions of the two experts are opposite, so the editorial department can't draw a conclusion and need to find a third expert to review the manuscript. The opinion of the third expert will determine your article.
Question 4: What does it mean to pass the first trial in the submission? 1. After receiving the submission, the system will send a receipt and a trial fee notice; 2. Submit the manuscript to the responsible editor for preliminary review and send it to two experts for review, and enter the review process, with the status of "under review"; 3. If 1 approver has returned approval opinions, the status will be "Approved Partially"; If both reviewers return their comments, the status is "Geng Shen has been reviewed"; 4. The responsible editor will add handling opinions to the reviewed manuscript and send it to the editor-in-chief for final review (status: "Final Review"); 5. The editor-in-chief will return the manuscript to the responsible editing room after the final review; 6. The responsible editor will feed back the final opinion of the editorial department to the author; The author can log on to the website at any time to check the manuscript processing status, but only in step 6 can the author see the review comments and final processing comments. Intermediate states, such as "Part of the review has been reviewed", "Review has been reviewed" and "Final review", please wait patiently.
Question 5: What does the preliminary examination of submission mean? First trial-review-final trial, wait for the final trial ~ but after the first trial, you can't vote again ~
Question 6: Is the review of magazine contributions a second or third trial system? I will leave the manuscripts that I thought were good at first to the editor for retrial, and some will have to be reviewed three times before they can be finalized. In other words, your manuscript has passed the first trial, wait for the second trial, and you won't know the result of the manuscript until it is finalized. It's no use guessing Sichuan now.
Question 7: The submission review was rejected for nearly half a year, and there was no peer review opinion. Why use this word? That's called rejection. There are two possibilities for rejection. One is that your article is too weak, and the other is that the article itself is ok, but the style and content do not meet the positioning requirements of the magazine, so it is for this reason that you should generally carefully consider the manuscripts and sample articles of the magazine.
Question 8: I contributed to Journal of Aerospace Dynamics. At present, the status of the manuscript is peer review (responsible editor). What does this mean? Is it possible to be hired? This year, Aerospace Power magazine changed its review process, and the editorial department conducted the first review-external review by peer experts-review by the responsible editorial board-final review by editors.
Being able to enter the review shows that the previous expert's external audit opinion is good, and you can consider hiring or hiring after modification.
Look at the editorial board list, it should be the one who is responsible for judging in the same direction as your paper submission.