People who have revised their thesis writing generally do not have the right to sign. Details are as follows:

I. Professionalism and anonymity:

Thesis is an academic work, and the person who puts forward the revision opinions is usually a colleague, tutor or reviewer with professional knowledge and experience. In academic circles, opinions are often modified anonymously, which can ensure the fairness and objectivity of the evaluation and avoid prejudice to the evaluation results due to personal relationships or other factors.

Two. Protecting academic freedom and independence:

Academic circles pay attention to academic freedom and independence, and those who propose amendments should be able to express their views and suggestions freely without being bound by personal reputation or other factors. Anonymous peer review can reduce the interference or pressure on reviewers, thus better protecting academic freedom and independence.

Third, confidentiality and privacy protection:

The revision of the paper involves the evaluation and criticism of the author's academic level and writing ability. Keeping the identity of the person who proposed the amendment confidential can avoid revealing personal information and evaluation and protect their privacy.

Fourth, academic ethics and norms:

In academic circles, people who propose amendments usually follow academic ethics and norms and pay attention to evaluation content rather than personal identity. Anonymous evaluation helps to maintain the fairness and credibility of academic circles and reduce the influence of human factors on evaluation results.

Verb (abbreviation of verb) protects academic exchange and cooperation;

Academic exchange and cooperation is an important part of academic research. Anonymous evaluation can create an open and frank academic atmosphere, make scholars more willing to actively participate in and contribute their own opinions and suggestions, and promote equality and justice in academic exchanges and cooperation.

Six, matters needing attention:

It should be reminded that although the person who puts forward the revision opinions generally does not have the right to sign, in some cases, such as the author's request or special needs, the reviewer may also get an appropriate signature or thank you in the paper to express his gratitude. In some specific academic conferences or periodicals, there may be public evaluation, that is, the identity of reviewers is made public.