In daily study, work and life, many people have written comments, which can make the evaluated object produce and form the consciousness of consciously advancing according to the requirements and steps of the goal. So how can I write a good review? The following are the comments of the thesis defense tutor I compiled for you, for reference only. Welcome to reading.
Comments of thesis defense tutor: 1 1. In the five-minute presentation, the student introduced the main content and structure of the paper, as well as the research conducted for this purpose, which showed that he had a certain understanding of the research issues. The video design is beautiful, but it doesn't meet the professional requirements. It will be better to design the implementation process from the perspective of computer science.
The student fluently stated the theoretical and practical significance of writing this paper. The design process of antique websites is standardized, but there is little connection between entities and concepts. The whole design should meet the requirements of the computer as much as possible.
This student speaks clearly and answers questions fluently. Although the paper has a good idea and certain research value, the framework and content are huge, which requires strong independent research ability, and the title of the paper and the client login server module need to be slightly modified. The students are well prepared, the link sentences are complete, the thesis is clearly conceived, which embodies a good professional foundation and a good grasp of time. That is, there is demand in the paper but there is a lack of demand analysis, and the answers to some defense questions are not clear, and the graphic representation is not standardized.
4. Students use dreamweave and access database technology to design Ganzi tourism website. The design is fresh and beautiful, the main questions are answered accurately, and the basic concepts are clear. I want to correct the database storage problem in the file.
This student has good professional quality, fluent answer and high accuracy. He has a good understanding of the problems encountered in the implementation process and a good grasp of time. It will be better if it can be implemented in a relatively new operating environment.
6. The student explained the design details of the database in detail, did in-depth research, and independently completed the design part of the forum. He has certain scientific research ability, clear thinking in his defense and concise and smooth answers. After careful discussion, the defense team agreed that the student's performance was good, but asked the student to correct some mistakes in the paper.
7. In the ten-minute presentation, the student introduced the main idea, content and structure of the paper, as well as the writing process of the paper. The organization is clear, the language is correct, and the teacher's questions are basically answered correctly, which reflects a certain professional quality. However, there are some minor problems in the design process and the flow chart is not perfect. I hope to correct it in time.
8. As can be seen from the defense, this student has a solid professional foundation, is well prepared, is very familiar with the contents of the paper, can concisely and clearly state the design ideas and processes, has a smooth system display, has well-founded answers to questions, has clear basic concepts, and has certain innovations in the paper. I hope to continue to improve some words and symbols in the paper and strive for standardized use.
9. The student explained the main contents of the paper fluently and clearly within the specified time, and was able to answer the questions related to the paper properly, with a modest attitude and a solid computer foundation. It is suggested to use appropriate words to express the image opening function and standardize the paper format.
10, this article has a novel idea. Taking-as a clue and combining with local standards, this paper comprehensively analyzes the existing problems and reasons of-. And put forward the countermeasures to solve the existing problems. Content argumentation also teaches scientific rationality. The full text fully embodies the characteristics of administrative management specialty and the format is standardized. But innovation is not enough.
1 1. This article meets the professional requirements and reflects social hot issues. Therefore, the research on this subject is beneficial to the further development of China. The full text starts with the problem of-,and then analyzes the reasons. On this basis, the related. The full text has proper structure, clear thinking and basically correct views.
12, the paper has clear ideas and fluent sentences. Can well investigate the existing problems. The author has a certain understanding and familiarity with the content of the paper. Clear thinking, clear hierarchy and reasonable logical structure. The viewpoint is expressed accurately. The research principles are appropriate. In the process of demonstration, we can effectively combine professional principles with the topics to be studied. The opinions demonstrated in some places are not very clear, and generally meet the requirements of graduation thesis.
13, the topic is contemporary and realistic, the structure of the full text is reasonable, the viewpoints are basically accurate, and the ideas are basically clear. The content of the full text is basically written according to the training requirements of the administrative management major, and I have consulted a lot of relevant materials, but it does not fully reflect the characteristics of the administrative management major, and there are not many things that belong to my own innovation. Generally speaking, it meets the requirements of graduation thesis.
14, this paper studies the official accountability system, which can provide reference for solving the problems existing in the official accountability system in China. In the structure of the full text, firstly, the basic principle of the official accountability system is analyzed, then the problems existing in the official accountability system in China are deeply analyzed, and finally, effective suggestions are put forward for the previous problems. The full text reflects the requirements of professional characteristics, some of which are closely related to responsibilities, and there are not many contents that really belong to their own innovation. Generally speaking, it meets the requirements of graduation thesis.
15, the topic of this paper meets the requirements of the training objectives of administrative management specialty, and it can comprehensively use administrative knowledge to analyze the practical problems of enterprise administration. The writing attitude of the paper is serious and responsible, the content of the paper is sufficient, the relevant reference materials meet the needs of the topic, the hierarchical structure is reasonable, the main points are clearly expressed, the logical thinking basically meets the requirements, and the language expression is basically smooth. However, the depth of argument is not enough and innovation is insufficient.
Comments of thesis defense tutor: 2 1. The thesis has reached the level of master's degree thesis, and I agree to participate in the thesis defense, suggesting that a master's degree be awarded.
2.xx's master thesis "Design and Application of Telecom Convergence Billing System", on the basis of related literature research and current affairs dynamic analysis, discusses the convergence billing method which can not only safeguard the interests of operators but also maximize the interests of consumers. Combined with the real operator's billing system, several scenarios are designed, and the simulation analysis and verification are carried out, which proves that the system function can meet the actual work requirements of integrated billing and achieve the design goal.
3. The topic of the paper is very good and creative. It is understood that the author came into contact with Maslow's psychological theory in the study of business English. The first time I read TheCalloftheWild by JackLondon was in my sophomore English reading class. In order to write this paper well, the author has done some research, especially the original work of JackLondon. It is not difficult to see from the author's quotation of the original work that she is quite familiar with the content of the original work. The author has a serious writing attitude, and can complete the research and writing plan of the paper in stages according to the requirements of the school and the writing progress drawn up by himself in the opening report. Once the mistakes in the first draft from form to content are pointed out, the author can take them seriously and revise them repeatedly. Although the language is still a little immature, the paper is a good article with clear and reasonable ideas, unique views and certain reference value.
4. The topic of this thesis has certain theoretical value and practical significance. Based on the basic process of G billing, this paper adopts centralized processing mode to build a comprehensive billing and accounting system platform integrating data acquisition, preprocessing, billing and data mining technology for comprehensive settlement analysis. The platform aims at the integration of customers, that is, the integration of customer brands and payment methods; Business integration, that is, product bundling and cross-discount across services, products and customers, and complete connection between business operation and billing strategy; The integration of charging methods, namely the integration of online charging and offline charging; The integration of payment methods, that is, the integration of prepaid and post-paid. It fully embodies the goal of meeting all the needs of existing users and giving full play to the services of operators under G network, which has certain practical significance for the current telecom convergence model.
5. The author made a serious revision on the basis of the first draft. This paper has been greatly improved in content and form. Two flowcharts downloaded from the Internet that have little to do with the content of the article have been deleted. Part of the preface has been moved to the text as required. The conclusion part has been added, although the content needs to be enriched. Some references have been rearranged, but there are still some irregularities.
6. The topic of the paper is basically the same as the content of the paper, with complete structure and fluent language. Even the first draft, except that the paragraphs are too thin, there are not many serious grammar or spelling mistakes. The author tries to find the connection between the author and a character in Jack London's life. From the content point of view, the author has a better understanding of the original work and collected relevant materials, but only limited to the list of materials. How to draw your own conclusion by analyzing the materials is the purpose of this paper, and it is at this point that the author's efforts are not enough.
7. The graduation thesis design summary structure is complete, and each part basically conforms to the English thesis writing standard. The author tries to analyze the cultural conflicts in multinational companies from the perspective of cultural comparison between East and West, and find ways to solve these conflicts. In order to write this paper well, the author obviously consulted a lot of information, which was fully discussed and clearly organized. Unfortunately, because the author herself has no working experience in multinational companies and has not made corresponding investigations in multinational companies, her discussion can only be based on second-hand materials obtained from reading, and the so-called oriental culture is mostly represented by Japanese materials. To solve the cultural conflicts of multinational companies in China, readers need more cultural contrast between China and the West. Although the author added some in the later draft, there are still some shortcomings.
8. The new revision includes: the replacement of the first sentence and keywords in the abstract should further explain the "Superman" who influenced JackLondon's life and was embodied in his work TheCalloftheWild. Some confusion in tense usage needs to be corrected. There are too many quotations and too few comments, and some references are not mentioned at all in the article, which is a difficult problem to solve. It is pointed out that London is a so-called superman and Buck is a super dog to illustrate the relationship between them and the influence of the author's life on his works.
9. In the research work of this thesis, the student consulted and analyzed the latest academic literature in the field of phased array antenna testing and diagnosis at home and abroad, and put forward his own views on this basis. The materials cited in the thesis writing are true and reliable, the research methods are correct, the obtained data are detailed, the writing norms meet the requirements, the article structure is logical and meets the requirements of the dissertation.
10. In the postgraduate study stage, the student actively demands ideological progress, always strictly demands himself and actively studies the policy line of the CPC Central Committee. In learning, according to my own research direction, I carefully studied relevant books inside and outside the class, consulted professional literature, mastered basic theoretical knowledge and professional knowledge, and successfully completed my master's thesis. Full of enthusiasm for life, harmonious relationship with classmates and helpful. I hope that in my future work and study, I will continue to maintain and carry forward my fine style and make greater achievements.
1 1. In the study of professional courses, he carefully studied the relevant core courses according to the requirements of his research direction, laying a solid foundation for scientific research; During her study, she also studied many other courses, broadened her horizons and got a deeper understanding of the structure of the whole research field. In English learning, I have strong English listening, speaking, reading and writing skills.
12, the student has a good foreign language level, can read foreign language documents of related majors skillfully, and has good English writing and conversation skills.
13. During my master's thesis, I actively participated in various teaching and scientific research activities. In the process of teaching practice, he carefully read textbooks and consulted academic materials, which greatly improved his teaching level. At the same time, she also has strong practical ability, participated in many topics of her tutor, and greatly improved her theoretical and practical level. I have participated in academic exchanges of papers at or above the provincial level for many times, and my eloquence and speaking ability have been comprehensively improved.
14. The graduate student successfully passed CET-4 and achieved excellent results in GRE. Have high English listening, speaking, reading and writing skills, and perform well in foreign academic exchanges of the Institute of Development and Educational Psychology.
15. During the internship, the student worked very hard, very hard, very hard. When you encounter something you don't understand at work, you can humbly ask your experienced predecessors. Be able to listen to other people's work suggestions with an open mind. Be able to flexibly apply what you have learned in school to specific work, and complete the work assigned by the leaders with good quality and quantity. At the same time, the student can strictly abide by the rules and regulations of the center, live in harmony with colleagues, and show good teamwork spirit and professionalism.
Comment by thesis defense supervisor 3 1. The paper is clear in expression and simple in explanation, but its shortcomings lie in the lack of its own new ideas and methods, mostly based on other people's research results, and the format of the paper should be standardized.
2. The defense is well prepared, and I can answer the teacher's questions in detail, discuss the difficulties encountered in the research and design process repeatedly, find a better solution, and have good professional skills. It would be better if the static web page can be made dynamic by combining professional improvement, but the deficiency is that the description of the table in the database is not quite right, and I hope it can be improved.
3. The thesis statement is clear, straight to the point, and directly into the subject. I can answer the teacher's questions fluently and think clearly, but I can't correctly explain some codes in the paper and there are a few language errors. I hope there will be more innovations in future research.
4. The student can state the main content of the paper within the specified time, but the answer to questions in the defense is not very smooth, unfamiliar with the design details, and the relevance of answering questions is not enough.
5. Elaborate the thesis from five parts, with outstanding key points, fluent and skilled defense, basic knowledge in place and time meeting the requirements. The disadvantage is that there are some conceptual mistakes in the article.
6. In the process of defense, the student can skillfully and concisely state the main contents of the paper within the specified time, with clear organization, obvious innovation, quick response when answering questions, accurate expression, skilled system demonstration and high professional quality. After deliberation by the defense Committee, it was agreed that his performance was excellent.
Thesis defense tutor comments 4 excellent:
Can fully complete the contents and requirements stipulated in the graduation design task book; Be able to flexibly use the theoretical knowledge learned to solve the problems in design, and have original opinions; Strong ability to work independently (refer to literature, investigate and study, collect data on site, make design plans, etc.). ), reasonable design, correct calculation result, clear chart, accurate expression, systematic paper, strict logic, fluent writing and concise text; Answer questions clearly and correctly in your defense.
Good:
Able to complete the contents and requirements specified in the graduation design task book; Be able to use the theoretical knowledge learned to solve problems in design; Have the ability to work independently (refer to literature, investigate and study, collect data on the spot, make design plans, etc.). ), the design is reasonable, the calculation result is basically correct, the chart is clear, the expression is basically accurate and organized; Answering questions in the reply is basically correct.
Medium:
Able to complete the contents and requirements specified in the graduation design task book; Poor ability to use theoretical knowledge to solve design problems; Ability to work independently (refer to literature, investigate and study, collect data on site, make design plan, etc.). ) weak, the design of the main parts is basically reasonable, the calculation results are not wrong in principle, and the charts and papers basically meet the requirements; There is no principled error in answering questions in the reply.
By:
Can basically complete the contents and requirements stipulated in the graduation design task book; Poor ability to use theoretical knowledge to solve design problems; Ability to work independently (refer to literature, investigate and study, collect data on site, make design plan, etc.). ) is weak, the design of the main parts is basically reasonable, the calculation results are not obviously wrong, and the charts and papers meet the basic requirements; There is no principled error in answering questions in the reply.
Failure:
Unable to complete the contents and requirements specified in the graduation design task book; Can't use theoretical knowledge to solve problems in design; Poor ability to work independently (refer to literature, investigate and study, collect data on site, make design plans, etc.). ), the design is unreasonable, the basic concepts are unclear, there are major errors in the calculation results, and the charts and papers cannot meet the basic requirements; There is a principled error in answering the question in the reply.
;