Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - The era of complete destruction of the three views
The era of complete destruction of the three views
Whether you admit it or not, this era is indeed an era in which the three views are completely destroyed.

Let's talk about what three views are first. The three views are world outlook, outlook on life and values. The world outlook is the way you see the world, the outlook on life is what you think people live for, and the values are what you think are the most meaningful. A person's three views determine his view of the objective world and his moral understanding and bottom line. In fact, all people's thoughts, decisions and behaviors are closely related to their own three views, and will gradually form a set of our own mental model. Why do we take immediate action when something happens? Behind all this is our thinking mode at work.

In this day and age, there is no longer any such rhetoric as incorrect views on three things, because when you say that others have incorrect views on three things, you are actually saying that others' views on three things are different from yours. Now everyone has the right to choose their own three views, so there is no longer any comparability between each person's three views, and there is no longer any distinction between highlands.

This is really good, and it makes many different views appear in this society, but it doesn't mean that this society contains all the three views. Why is homosexuality controversial now? Why is open marriage controversial? Controversy means that these still touch the bottom line of the mainstream values of this society.

In such an era, whether on TV or in life, we will meet many people you can't understand and do things you can't understand. Simply put, it is the act of destroying the three views. Therefore, I say this is an era in which the three views are completely destroyed.

Junior high school and senior high school are the most prone to make mistakes, and the university is the time when we really start to establish the three views. In junior high school and senior high school, we are in contact with people who live nearby and live in a small circle. They are also busy preparing for the exam, so it is certainly more fun to play. It's different when you go to college. I live a completely independent and free life alone in a completely strange place. This is a good time to cultivate three views. College students always like to say, "The world is very big, and I want to go out and have a look." Whether it is contact with people or with the world, it is shaping our three views.

Contact more and see more, and you will find that other people's three views are not used to overcome, but to understand and get along.

Actually, I learned this from watching Qipa. Qipa said it was my favorite program, and Amway gave it to many friends around me. In this era, everyone doesn't want to settle down to work. Even Ma Dongdong ran out of CCTV to host such a program. You can tell by the name that there must be a group of wonderful flowers here. Indeed, this is a wonderful debate program. Watching this program is to get rid of the three views. In this way, Xu has always said that this is a serious debate program.

At first, I was a little uncomfortable, and I felt that there was everyone in it. I dressed strangely, spoke strangely and said everything. But after watching more slowly, I fell in love with this program bit by bit and found that my heart widened and I was no longer strange to them. I slowly accepted this and learned a lot from it.

I remember when I was talking to Pa in the dormitory last semester, a roommate said, "How can this person be so girly and talk too girly!" Other students from other dormitories come to our dormitory to play, and then watch it next to me for a while and say, "What's the point of watching this program?" I really didn't know how to explain it to him.

Later, I found out that I wanted to broaden my horizons and think about problems at first because it had the purpose of debate. People on both sides will try to persuade you to agree with each other from various angles. Sometimes it's very interesting, that is, a person here just finished speaking and completely convinced me, and then the opposite person stood up and said, listen, I think what he said is very good and right, and then I was convinced by this side. The whole process is like riding a roller coaster, which is very exciting.

It's actually quite interesting. They can say many angles that you can't even think of. Some angles are novel, some are steep, and some can completely convince you. But as soon as he sat down and spoke, it seemed as if he had never heard the previous person's speech. I can only sigh silently: they are all talking people …

This program is necessary to exist in this era, because it advocates and embraces diverse values, which is its value and of course its difficulty. Cai Kangyong shouted out the pain of coming out in this program. This program can make him feel comfortable, which shows that it is an unusual program. In Kang's view, it is also a kind of happiness to finally have a place to say these words. In the second season, Qipa said that two topics were relatively open and not accepted by the mainstream public. It can be seen that Qipa is the vanguard of this era. Of course, these two questions must be deleted from the Internet. Last season, I especially liked Bai Bangni, because what she said had her own distinct three views. Many of her words resonated with me, and her thoughts were at the forefront of the times, which made me sigh that she was a brave soldier.

So how did this project come from such diverse values? First of all, this program spread this idea, which led to all kinds of wonderful flowers from all over China signing up for this program. Secondly, in the debate, confrontation brings diversity. In this program, I especially like Malik Weiwei, who is called the "Queen of Golden Sentences". She said that she can do both sides, and she has something to say no matter which side. She seldom takes her own story as an example in the debate, and feels that she speaks from many angles, and the content is particularly rich, which is really awesome. I have to say that this is the real debater.

In fact, in the process of keeping up with what Palmer said, while watching the debate, I became a different person. I will find myself more tolerant and diverse. I will start thinking about problems from different angles, and I will be more brave in pursuing the truth. I mean, this is what Chipper said brought me.

Carve a boat for a sword, learn to go with the flow, and don't let the three views be destroyed.