When writing an argumentative essay normally, I always express my point of view first, then demonstrate this point of view with facts and reasons, and finally summarize the full text and draw a satisfactory conclusion. This is called an argument. In fact, there is another way to write an argumentative paper, which is called rebuttal. It is to give a wrong point of view first, then refute this point of view, prove its mistake through discussion, and finally give a correct point of view. For example, for the phenomenon of wasting food, some people think that now that life is rich, it is nothing to waste a little. We can write an argumentative essay against this wrong view, refute it first, and then make it clear that it is wrong to waste food at any time.

So, how to write a rebuttal paper?

First of all, we should choose the object of criticism. Refuting a paper requires "bombarding" an opinion, refuting the other party and then making your own opinion stand up. We must be careful when determining the object of criticism, and ensure that the refuted viewpoint is wrong or one-sided, while the viewpoint we want to establish is comprehensive and correct. Otherwise, no matter how clever you are, readers will not believe you.

In fact, it is not difficult to do this, that is, to avoid controversial views, avoid people who can't make up their minds, and choose those views that are obviously wrong or obviously flawed as targets. For example, when the reading rate of the whole people is low, many people do not like electronic reading. In this case, some people even say that "e-reading has many benefits", which seems to be inconsistent with our subjective views and people can't help but want to refute it. But if you think about it again, e-reading is convenient and fast, and it can meet almost all kinds of reading needs, and it does have many benefits. Obviously, this is a controversial point of view and should not be listed as the object of criticism. However, if someone says that "electronic reading should replace book reading", then this view is obviously wrong and worth refuting.

Secondly, we should master the basic methods of refutation. There are generally three ways to refute a thesis: one is to directly refute other people's wrong views. For example, some people think that teenagers don't need to cultivate the quality of loving labor at an early age. Then you can directly denounce this view as extremely wrong; Then through enumerating positive and negative examples, it proves how far-reaching the influence of teenagers' habit of loving labor is on their lives and the whole society. Finally, the correct view is given: it is not only the need of personal healthy growth to let teenagers develop the quality of loving labor from an early age.