I think, if you don't have to accept dogmatic comments, you just have to write according to the logic of the article, so you don't have to worry about those boring and smelly rules. For a well-founded article, argument is much more important than proportion.
If the viewpoint is novel and the argument is in place, even if there are no examples, it is still a good article. Just because an article has no examples doesn't mean that it can't find suitable examples. Maybe it's just that there are too many examples, too common.
If a specific example is put forward, it will damage the universality of argument; If you add a few more complete supplements, it will make the article appear lengthy. Generally speaking, only when you find inspiring examples will you consider giving such examples, otherwise you can only add more words.
In addition, please note that for a higher point of view, the low-level argument itself can be regarded as an example, or it may be called an abstract example. Some netizens said that my article lacked examples, which may only be confined to the level of concrete common sense, while ignoring the abstract examples here.
My articles are generally tall. If we want to trace back to specific common sense, the front will be longer, the article will be unnecessarily wordy, and even there will be faults. For such a high-viewpoint article, it is naturally best to find vivid and typical examples, but we should not ask too much of them. After all, most of them are only individual cases, and more abstract examples are needed.
Dogmatists ask middle school students to give simple examples, probably because they don't need to write articles with high opinions. Dogmatists ask middle school students to give examples, which can not only explain things vividly, but also be objective, and will not make arguments become pure sophistry.
I will not talk about the realistic servility of this view here, but point out that such objectivity is only an illusion. In fact, the examples cited in writing articles are all beneficial to their own arguments, and they always unconsciously ignore those counterexamples, resulting in the illusion that everything is like this.
For example, when we talk about the harm of internet addiction, we always say that some students delay their studies because they are addicted to the internet, but they ignore the ideological enlightenment of the internet to others. For those students who are addicted to the internet, the deeper reason may be their disappointment with our education and society. It can be seen that examples can not only explain the problem, but also cover it up.
Examples are not necessary for authors, especially those who can put forward high opinions, but our readers can test their understanding by trying to give appropriate examples. Interested readers may wish to have a look. How many examples have I given in this article, and how many are so-called abstract examples? The composition of the college entrance examination is really harmful. Please read the blog post: How does the composition of the college entrance examination become a draft activity?
2. What should I do if I can't write my senior high school composition? I will give you two routines, which are very useful! !
Most of the compositions in high school are written by you, so you must find the central argument! !
Routine 1: the first paragraph: combine the materials to lead to the central argument. Paragraph 234: Give three examples, and deduct the beginning and end of these three paragraphs! (examples need to be accumulated by yourself! ! The last paragraph: to sum up, we should learn from the people in the examples and then draw our views.
Routine 2:
Paragraph 1: Cite materials and give opinions. (within 100 words)
The second paragraph: list counter-examples in society (slightly more)
The third paragraph: put forward your views again (just a few words)
Paragraph 4: Examples (about three, please briefly describe)
Paragraph 5: How to solicit opinions (slightly more)
The sixth paragraph: the end, be beautiful! !
Routine one is easy to write, and the score can be guaranteed to be around 43 points. Routine 2 is not easy to write, but it will get a high score. . Accumulate more beautiful sentences and practice more, and you will write well!
3. What if the composition is not long? Materials are the most important. Read more model essays and learn to accumulate. Practice more and you will improve! Hope to adopt. Go to sleep and hope to see your satisfactory score in the college entrance examination. Thank you for being admitted to an ideal university.
Decompose and refine the theme. Decomposition is to divide a scene into several aspects, a scene into several parts, and the actions of the characters are decomposed into several actions. For example, "Mark rushed to the goal with the ball and kicked it to the bottom of the net." We can imagine the scene at that time and break down the shooting process: ① Receiving the pass. (2) Kick with your feet. The ball goes over the head of the opposing player. (4) Mark faster plug-ins. (5) past players. 6. Avoid the opposing goalkeeper. ⑦ target. Then think about the specific situation of each action, and then connect this series of actions in series: "Marco skillfully blocks his partner's ball with his chest in the midfield, habitually uses his thigh as a cushion, skillfully picks the ball over the head of the opposing defender, then inserts it quickly, and then uses flexible and realistic fake actions to successively evade the interception of four defenders, and finally avoids the goalkeeper who has jumped in front of him, and almost even people hit the net with the ball." You see, if you break it down like this, the content will be concrete, the length will be longer and it will be more interesting to read. Is your method wrong, not because you don't write long? If you use the right method, there is no reason not to write long, okay?
4. Learn to survive. What if you get lost in the wild?
What should I do if I meet a bad guy on a remote path?
What would you do if you came home and found your family in a coma?
Life is not smooth sailing, there will be sudden danger. Just like it said. In this society, survival is the knowledge we must master.
My parents never take vacations, so I often stay at home alone on weekends. When I first moved, I stayed at home alone. At first, nothing happened. After a while, the doorbell rang. Is it dad? No, he is too busy to go home. Dad has a key, so there is no need to ring the doorbell. I got up the courage to pick up the receiver, and I said, "Hello?" There was silence on the other side of the receiver. I was a little scared and accidentally pressed the button to open the door. Oh, no! I want to kill myself. I heard footsteps and knew someone was coming. I remember hearing a man knocking at the door at home. Forget it. I'll pretend there's no one in the screenwriter. No, what if he breaks in? I moved a big chair carefully, on the one hand, blocking the door, on the other hand, because I wanted to see if the cat's eye could touch it. Outside the door is an uncle. What's he holding in his hand? It's not the murder weapon, is it? I grabbed a pair of big leather shoes from my father, and I was going to stun him when he opened the door. I picked up the phone and pressed my father's phone number. I can put my hand on the call button at any time to connect the phone.
He just wanted to knock at the door when he heard the phone ring. The people on the phone told him a lot, meaning that the people on the phone asked him if he had not come yet. He said he seemed to be going in the wrong direction, and I just suddenly realized when I watched him go upstairs and sighed. Fortunately, I got away with it once.
Survival is a necessary course. We should learn to deal with different events in different environments and occasions.