The ultimate goal of Chinese learning is to write a good article, which shows that composition correction is an important part and link of composition teaching.

First, the basic points: (words, volume, handwriting, typos)

Requirements: the topic is complete, in the middle of the first line; There is a paragraph with 2 spaces at the beginning; One punctuation mark occupies one grid, and it is basically used correctly; Clean, no graffiti; More than 600 words; No typos (every 3 typos will be deducted 1 point, with a maximum of 3 points)

1. Clean paper, neat handwriting, standard punctuation, more than 600 words, no typos (60 points).

2. A small amount of correction, neat handwriting, standard punctuation, between 400 and 500 words, with typos (50 points). The surface of C roll has been altered a lot, and the handwriting is scrawled, with only commas and periods, less than 400, and many typos. (30 points)

There are many alterations on the surface of the scroll, and the handwriting is almost illegible. (20 points)

Second, the structure of the article (10)

Requirements: the topic is novel, and the topic or material is deducted; Both the beginning and the end are creative or caring; Transitional nature; The paragraphs are clear.

1. Good topic, more than four paragraphs, each paragraph has a central sentence, and there is a parallel or hierarchical relationship between paragraphs; A good beginning and a good ending. (9- 10 integral)

2. The topic is general, the topic or material is deducted, and there are more than four paragraphs, each paragraph has a central sentence, and there is a parallel or hierarchical relationship between paragraphs; The beginning and the end are naturally not creative. (7-8 points)

3. the topic can't see the shadow of the topic and the material. The paragraph is divided into three paragraphs, some of which have central sentences and are irrelevant. (5-6 points)

4.4 There is no topic, and the following three paragraphs are segmented casually. There is no central sentence in the paragraph, and the beginning and end are not noticeable. (3-4 points)

Third, the style of the article (10)

Requirements: Make up your mind, from small to big or from one to two; The viewpoint is correct, profound, novel and distinct; Distinctive style, or narrative, or philosophy, or landscape writing.

1. Clear thinking, clear views, topic at the beginning or end, clear style. (9- 10 integral)

2. Unique thinking, basically can put forward opinions through phenomena, and the style at the beginning or end is clear. (7-8 points)

3. The idea is general, only talking about the phenomenon and my own evaluation. I chose a topic somewhere in the text, and the style is unknown (5-6 points).

I didn't have a brain, so I wrote casually, and I wrote wherever I wrote, without any focus. (3-4 points)

Four, choose materials to deal with feelings (10)

Requirements: extensive materials, real life; Typical materials and appropriate details; Emotional expression is true and natural.

1. Very appropriate (or novel), with appropriate materials and sincere feelings. (9- 10 integral)

2. The topic is relatively broad, but you can see the author's writing intention and have material, but it is either too short or too long, and the feelings are natural and healthy. (7-8 points)

There are one or two materials and concrete examples, but there are no details that can impress or attract readers. (5-6 points)

I only talk about my own life in general, but my understanding is still superficial, atypical, poorly tailored and piled up with words. (3-4 points)

Five, language and literary talent (20 points)

1. Fluent in language, using more than five famous sentences or using rhetorical devices accurately in more than five places (or poetic, humorous and sharp). (20 points)

2. The language in some places is accurate and vivid, but it can't stand scrutiny on the whole, and there are many loopholes. Fluent in language and able to use rhetorical devices accurately. (15)

3. The language is verbose, unattractive, and can only express limited content, only one or two famous sentences or rhetorical devices, and rhetoric is more conventional. (10)

4. There are many mistakes in sentences, poor use of words and unsatisfactory use of words, which makes it difficult for readers to understand and can't arouse readers' interest in reading. (5 points)

Scoring Note: The full score of each composition is 100. The total score is the sum of the scores of each part. Among them, more than 80 points are A, 70 to 80 points are B, 60 to 70 points are C, and below 60 points are unqualified.

Form of composition evaluation: Writing requirements of composition evaluation: always write at the end of the article, and the comments should be focused, reflecting the unique personality of the second composition. As long as you grasp one or two highlights and highlights of the composition, you can comment. You don't have to cover everything, just talk in general. Give affirmation and encouragement to the advantages, and give specific suggestions to the disadvantages. The content includes improper metaphor, repeated use of words, unclear meaning, improper use of words, inaccurate use of words, unclear organization, punctuation errors and so on.

5. Try a step-by-step and multi-level composition correction method.

① Students correct themselves. After writing a composition every time, grade the composition according to the marking standard.

(2) Students change and learn from each other. Before students revise each other's compositions, they must set up corresponding student composition correction groups. Divide the students in a class into several groups according to their writing ability, and choose the students with higher writing level as the group leader. When implementing mutual correction, refer to the above-mentioned composition correction steps for targeted correction, including grading according to standards and making comments. Four to five people in each group, each group corrects four compositions, and the team members take turns correcting them, so that each person corrects three to four articles.

③ AC feedback. After correcting, the group members discuss and exchange these compositions, and choose the two with the highest and lowest scores in each group. After the selection, each group will send a team member to show the grading results to the whole class, stating the advantages of excellent articles and the disadvantages of low-scoring articles. Then other students or articles or compositions add their opinions. Finally, the teacher commented.

(4) After the teacher comments on the students' mutual change, the teacher will draw a quarter from each class to check whether the students' evaluation conforms to the objective reality and whether the evaluation level can convince the assessed. Give praise to those who are evaluated as excellent; For those who have different evaluations, interview and point out the problems.

After the composition review class, teachers should sort out the compositions of students with low scores, analyze the existing problems one by one, and prescribe the right medicine, so that these students with weak writing foundation can get the greatest improvement in correcting and explaining again and again.