Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Similarities and differences of family policies between Han Dynasty and Tang Dynasty
Similarities and differences of family policies between Han Dynasty and Tang Dynasty
First of all, the political goals of Han and Tang dynasties are the same, both of which are to consolidate the rule of the dynasty, which is the most fundamental similarity between the two. Even if there are various purposes, they are all to consolidate the rule; The difference lies in the different manifestations of purpose in different periods.

Secondly, the intimacy of the Han Dynasty was basically in the Western Han Dynasty, and the attitude of intimacy was "respect before respect". In order to consolidate the political power, the Western Han Dynasty, which was established in a large-scale war, urgently needed self-cultivation. In BC 198, Liu Bang established a policy of closeness and gave a large amount of property to the Huns. This humiliating policy of protecting the border with the nature of tribute is passive and helpless. When Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty was in love, his attitude was very high, and he bite the hand that feeds him, with the aim of submitting the Huns to the Han Dynasty. But the pro-Chinese policy is mainly a strategy and strategic policy, which will stop when political interests are not obtained.

In the Tang dynasty, the process of pro-marriage had a developmental adjustment, from strategy to policy to national policy, and pro-marriage never stopped. The specific manifestations are as follows: First, the marriage standard is high, and the number of princesses who are married by the royal family and the imperial clan is gradually increasing, forming a true "national marriage".

Secondly, the frequency, frequency and duration of marriage in Tang Dynasty are very high. According to statistics, the blood relationship between the Tang Dynasty and foreign rulers was at least 28 times, running through the whole Tang Dynasty. In contrast, the relationship between the Han Dynasty and the rulers of border ethnic minorities was basically only in the Western Han Dynasty, and most of them were of a lower level.

Third, the scope and objects of in-laws in the Tang Dynasty were extensive. The Tang Dynasty had a close relationship with almost all foreign fans around it. Besides, in our time, it is also common for princesses of Li Tang royal family to kiss their children. The purpose of this kind of alternative kissing is to expand and consolidate the prestige of the royal family in the army, thus maintaining the stability of the frontier, which is also the embodiment of implementing the national policy of kissing.

Fourth, Han He regards intimacy and military conquest as the basic means of governing the country and securing the country. The pro-Qin policy of the Han Dynasty has always been strategic. Since Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, the pro-Qin policy was mainly based on military conquest, supplemented by pro-Qin, so it could not last. The policy of intimacy and alienation in the Tang Dynasty has always been based on intimacy and alienation, supplemented by military conquest. Since Emperor Taizong, the pro-democracy policy has easily become a national policy.

Finally, the Tang Dynasty had the social foundation of great ethnic integration in Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties, and the social foundation of affinity was better than that of the Han Dynasty. However, with the changes of the times and social forces, the political influence of pro-Qin is also different. Relatively speaking, the Tang Dynasty is bigger and taller than the Han Dynasty, which is a different manifestation of the in-laws policy of the two dynasties.

Of course, their effects are different.