Total score of postgraduate entrance examination = (total score of initial test ÷5)×55%+ written test score of retest (full score 100) ×20%+ interview score of retest (full score 15)+usual score (full score 10)+bonus points.

The composition of the re-examination results of postgraduate entrance examination: re-examination results = written examination results of professional courses × written examination weight+interview results ×(90%- written examination weight)+foreign language listening and speaking ability results × 10%.

2. To review specialized courses better, we must first understand the following questions:

Has the school designated a re-examination bibliography? What bibliographies have been designated? What was the form of the second interview in previous years? What questions did the tutor ask in the second interview? What are the knowledge points that schools often test? Only when candidates fully grasp this information can they have a clear review goal and direction, so as to make the review more efficient and achieve twice the result with half the effort. Candidates often worry about where to collect this information, which is really difficult to collect, but they can still get it as long as they collect it carefully.

There are usually three channels to collect this information: first, candidates can log on to the website of the school they are applying for, find the reference books and retest subjects of the school, and collect information from the website forums and related website forums of the school; The second is to ask the brothers and sisters of the school for some review experience and re-examination questions; Third, if the information is relatively blocked, candidates can consult the teachers of the postgraduate counseling institutions for re-examination information of some schools.

3, master review skills, carefully prepare for the postgraduate re-examination.

After mastering the above re-examination information, what candidates have to do is to carefully prepare for the re-examination. If they want to stand out in the second interview, they must work hard and review in a down-to-earth manner.

First, candidates should focus on broadening their professional knowledge and read more relevant professional books. The first test of postgraduate entrance examination focuses on the investigation of professional basic knowledge, and the second test is more professional, focusing on the depth and breadth of professional knowledge, professional research and ability. The questions and answers of the second interview are basically subjective questions, and there is a lot of room for play. When reviewing, candidates should jump out of the preliminary examination procedure, make clear the research status and progress of their major with the goal of improving their ability, and flexibly use relevant professional knowledge to solve practical problems.

Second, understand the research direction and research results of relevant tutors in colleges and universities. Each school's postgraduate entrance examination and re-examination questions are different. This school has a group of tutors who give questions. For a period of time, they are always paying attention to a certain research topic, or what achievements have been made on which topic, which is more or less reflected in the examination questions. In addition, if candidates use several theories and viewpoints of the interview tutor when answering related questions, it is very easy to get the favor of the tutor. Therefore, candidates should read the tutor's relevant papers and pay attention to their own research direction and research results when reviewing at ordinary times.

Third, answer questions with "professional" thinking and "professional" language. Different majors have different technical terms and different ways of thinking. It is particularly important for candidates who take an interdisciplinary examination to think and answer questions with professional terms in the second interview. Postgraduate examination is a selective examination, which requires candidates to have strong professional quality. Candidates should pay attention to this point when reviewing and think and express problems with "professional" thinking.

Fourth, pay attention to factual hotspots and professional frontiers. Some practical subjects, in the second interview, often allow candidates to interpret a current hot topic from a professional perspective, such as journalism, which is more real-time. Candidates should pay more attention to some social hotspots and practice thinking and interpretation from a professional perspective.

In addition, the graduate school pays attention to candidates' understanding of professional frontier knowledge. After all, graduate students should follow their tutors to do research. During the second interview, teachers usually ask some frontier questions of professional courses. Postgraduate entrance examination and re-examination experts advise candidates to read more academic papers of related majors during review, so as to clarify the frontier of their major so as to be handy during re-examination.

In short, the second interview is the last stage of postgraduate entrance examination and the last obstacle for students to realize their dream of postgraduate entrance examination. Candidates can go through customs smoothly as long as they master the correct review methods and skills and prepare carefully.