(2) [Cao Cao, the ancient emperor of Wei, recommended talents based on talents] is more prominent. He has given three orders to hire talents regardless of morality. He even said: "Those people who are not justified, hide a knife in their smile, or are heartless and unfilial, but have the ability to fight for the country" should be recommended by local officials to make them "useful". Thus, a Wang Jue ignores evil virtue and only attaches importance to its virtue. "That is to say, officials should be meritocratic and their salaries should be graded according to morality. (There is also the example of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, which can be used to refute the other party's meritocracy. )
(3) [This is today's example] We have a lot of things to do today, and the professional division of labor is no problem. If "virtue" is regarded as the criterion for appointing leading cadres at all levels, even if some industrialists go beyond the traditional morality, if they don't understand business at all, I'm afraid they won't be determined. What's more, today's so-called "virtue" is only superficial, organized, disciplined, revolutionary and enthusiastic. Confucius said,' I am not as good as my old nursery'. It is conceivable that sage is like Confucius. If he is allowed to lead an agricultural production cooperative, he will definitely think that he is not as good as an old farmer. Now, I change two poems by Gong Ding 'an to end this little feeling:' May God be energetic and use talents in an eclectic way.'
(4) [This can be refuted with our point of view ("virtue" commands "talent", and virtue is the relationship between "foundation" and "standard". Here, we don't pretend that virtue is Wang Wei's saying that generals are soldiers. This statement can't stand scrutiny. Some people have good morals, but they have no skills. Isn't this "the strong will lead the weak"? There are still some people who have bad morals but are very capable. Isn't this "weak generals have Qiang Bing"? This can only prove that morality cannot lead talents, and it is often "dereliction of duty". If moral character is "basic" and can be "standard", then people with good moral character must be tall and deep-rooted! However, this is not the case. As for "good thoughts dominate good deeds", it has nothing to do with "talent". A person with good moral character will naturally do good things, but this does not mean that he can do great things, because doing great things requires great talents, and great talents cannot be produced from "good thoughts." China has had "moralism" since ancient times, and Confucianism is the representative. In order to highlight morality, Confucianism has done two things, one is
(5) [This can be used to strengthen our ruling class to promote its strengths and restrain its shortcomings when appointing people] or to apply the old saying of Sima Guang, "Do whatever you want, learn from each other's strengths." .
(6) [Although we have established the foundation of virtue, we can also assume that the other person's virtue is correct, and then draw this embarrassing conclusion]: In the most respected professional survey, there are 2 1938 people, and professors and scholars rank first with 44.86% of the votes. Why? Excuse me, why is this? Because professors and scholars are symbols of knowledge and talent, isn't it because of their talent that people admire and admire them? For those friends who think derby is important, I want you to think about this question: people's "eating" and "living" are very important. "Eating" and "living" are the first instinct of human beings and the foundation of everything, but can we say that eating is more important in human society? In this case, what higher realm do we pursue? If that's the case, I'm afraid the other debater will also send him some indecent words.
(7) [This is the argument that determines social progress] The society has developed to this day, from primitive people eating and drinking blood to today's underground life. How did this great change come about? It depends on the nature of the universe and the gift of the primate. Hundreds of years ago, Marx made a comprehensive diagnosis of productivity, which is the fundamental force to promote human progress. Science and technology, the primary determinant of productivity today, can be developed only by virtue of mediocrity?
answer
Unique personality charm
0 vermicelli
second floor
(8) [This example can be used in our last argument about women's lack of virtue] In the evil old society, feudal rulers preached that women's absence was virtue in order to consolidate their rule over women. It can be seen that "talent" is like a scourge in the eyes of feudal rulers, which hinders their rule over women. After bidding farewell to the evil old society, the party and the government made great efforts to let women learn cultural knowledge and let us bid farewell to the past days of being cattle and horses and look up to be human beings. Today, women can stand on the top of the mountain and compete with men for the sun and the moon because of their talent. It can be seen that "talent" is the backbone for women to look up to being human.
(9) Einstein, Newton, Zu Chongzhi, Madame Curie, and so on. We will always remember the names of these people because they made great contributions to mankind with their outstanding talents, and because of this, they will remain immortal. There are countless respected people, and how many people will stay in history? In our education today, we pay great attention to protecting students' creativity, because innovation is the soul of national development and progress.
(10) [Beauty loves heroes] People always treat countless talented people at all times and in all countries with a tolerant eye. Because people know that Jasper doesn't hide jade in her spare time. We don't like what ordinary people say: it doesn't matter what problems young people have, they can be corrected slowly. We can let them slowly correct their moral deficiencies. However, we cannot correct their shortcomings. No, we always say, young man, learn some skills quickly! It goes without saying that since ancient times, beauty loves heroes, and it is talents that beauty loves heroes. Many beautiful women said: I took a fancy to his talent. Because since ancient times, talented people have been equipped with beautiful women, which shows the value of talent. Therefore, we believe that in today's society, morality is more important than ability.
(1 1) [I think this statement can improve the impression, hehe] In today's society, virtue is important, but it is more important. Today's society is full of competition. Without excellent technology, it is difficult to adapt to the development of the times, make outstanding achievements, and even support the family and settle down. In the real world, we say, "Those who can do more work do more." What does this mean? This shows that in the real human society, people's "talent" is the most important. The beginning of life is beautiful. As long as he is properly educated, he can certainly have noble virtues. However, his talents vary greatly. If you have a cat at home, although it has a good "virtue", but it can't be a mouse, you will definitely say this useless cat. Because no matter whether it's a black cat or a white cat, catching a mouse is a good cat. It depends on its ability to catch mice. Managing a class requires the ability to manage classes, managing a school requires the ability to manage schools, and managing a city requires the ability to manage cities. Today's society puts forward the view that inaction is the dereliction of duty of some cadres ... this is an era of calling for talents, because talents are valuable. Those who can move forward live there. I can say that knowledge is power, and even our debate today depends on our eloquence.
(12) 【 Contact the national conditions of China 】 The society is progressing and developing. In a blink of an eye, mankind swaggered into the 2 1 century. In this long time, China has overcome the decline and moved towards revitalization. Overcome division and move towards unity; Get rid of humiliation and rise up against it. China is showing itself to the world with a new attitude. You know, today's society is already a knowledge society. Without talents, what can we talk about social development? Remember what Chairman Mao said? "We now make desks as well as clothes. Can we make airplanes? Tractor. Please answer: What can we do in today's society without talent? Freud said, "No matter how limited civilization is to individuals, people always have ways to deal with it. Wit is the best safety valve developed by modern people. "The more civilization develops, the more depressed people are, and the more they need wit." What can you do without talent, even if our virtue is noble?
Tao Yuanming's: picking chrysanthemums under the east fence, leisurely seeing Nanshan. Can we all live so chic? Have you been to those days when you depend on your friends for help?
(13) Virtue is a beautiful character of human beings. Our view is that this is very important, but virtue alone is not enough. For example, the debater is a person with good moral character, and you are honest and kind ... but you can't grow crops well, do a good job and teach students well ... What can you do with good moral character? Different mistakes! In other words, virtue is a talent, including virtue. Qu Yuan was loyal to his country, but in the end he threw himself into the river. Can the opposing debater say that he is "virtuous"? Of course, we don't deny that Qu Yuan is also very talented, but we must admit that Qu Yuan's "talent" is not enough. If he has great talent, he can save the state of Chu. Therefore, Qu Yuan's failure lies in talent rather than talent, and virtue is more than enough, and virtue is more important than virtue. Zhuge Liang's capture of Meng Huo seven times just shows that Kong Ming is good at tricks. He knows that only in this way can Meng Huo be recovered, which shows that he is a talented and useful person. " Is that college student in Tsinghua (our ocean classmate) a talented person? They don't deserve this name! Qu Yuan's talent is far from enough, which is the root of his failure. What's the difference between throwing himself into the river and complaining all over the street? People who end up committing suicide are really stupid! Zhuge Liang conquered Meng Huo because of his extraordinary talent, otherwise what could others do? There are countless sages since ancient times! Let me continue to elaborate our views.
(14){ I wanted to discuss this line with you in the evening, but my language ability is not enough, alas! Dear debater, we never think that virtue is unimportant, so we never advocate using a person with poor moral quality and corrupt moral style to build a highly developed socialist society with material civilization and spiritual civilization. But I want to remind the debater that the current civil service examination is still based on ability, because the investigation of "virtue" can not be reflected at all. Just like a debater, I only know that you are talented at present. So you can be eloquent here. As for Germany, we have no idea at all. Will the other debater stop arguing with me because of my "virtue", and our argument here is precisely because we value the talent of the other debater, which shows that it is more important than Germany! Please answer your opponent. Are you arguing with your virtue? If so, don't show your eloquence, if not, then support our point of view, which is more important than Germany! (Friendly reminder; Most of these materials are extracted from the original paragraph, and a few have been revised and supplemented. Don't copy too much when using it, for fear of arousing the suspicion of the judges. )
answer
218.3.117. * Third floor
Supplement 1: (This has something to do with a short message I sent) If virtue is more than talent, how can you show and play your virtue? Because both acting and drama need talents, you need talents in education, speech and leadership, and so on. If your talent does not reach a certain level, your virtue will never be discovered, never play a role or have little effect, even if you have great talent. If all enterprises can choose talents with both ability and political integrity, there is no need for human resources departments to exist. Talents with both ability and political integrity are what Chinese and western enterprises want most. According to the company's standards, the human resources department will never find talents that are 100% compatible with the company's values. Therefore, we are more willing to ask, in the case of not having both ability and political integrity, which kind of person do you choose first? The premise of this question is, no matter what position, no matter when, in the case of little difference between the two, according to the needs of company strategy, what kind of person will you choose?
Supplement 2: (If they use this example to illustrate the current actual situation when choosing people who pay more attention to morality) Perhaps many people will think that since there is little difference, then everyone should choose talents who put morality first, and then. In fact, this is due to the inertia thinking of China enterprises in the past, or the traditional culture of China. But the reality is that, according to our experiments and investigations, great changes have taken place in the selection criteria of talents for enterprises in China.
On the above question, someone once conducted a sample survey on 0/00 enterprises in China, including both state-owned enterprises and private enterprises. In this way, the number of enterprises that choose Germany first and then choose talents is similar to that of enterprises that choose Germany first and then choose talents. Why? Our analysis shows that in the increasingly fierce market competition, especially after China's entry into WTO, China's market opening has greatly changed enterprises' understanding of talents. In emerging industries and fast-growing small and medium-sized enterprises, the company's strategies are basically radical, risky and highly mobile. Therefore, the requirement of enterprises for talents is: "As long as it does not violate the rules and regulations of enterprises and does not harm enterprises, it is the talents that enterprises need." Morality is meaningless without talent. They have lowered the moral requirements of China traditional culture, and talent is the first requirement of their company strategy. Compared with such enterprises, large enterprises and enterprises in traditional industries, morality is generally considered first, because the development of such enterprises has entered a relatively stable period, and their requirements for talents should be loyalty and morality first before they can be placed in the second place.