Keywords: results section

And the result? It is the core part of a paper and the result of the author's efforts. Its content is to express the information and data obtained from observation and research in the form of words, pictures and tables. It is not only the author's direct answer to his original design purpose or question, but also the basis of logical reasoning and in-depth discussion below. So the result part actually reflects the level and value of the paper, so it is very important to write the result part well. The title of the results section can also be adopted according to the characteristics of different papers? Experimental results? 、? Clinical efficacy? 、? Surgical results? And so on, in order to more accurately reflect its actual content. According to my own experience and the experience of some experts, I realized that I should write well? And the result? The following points should be noted.

First, fully grasp, carefully analyze and truthfully reflect the obtained materials.

A comprehensive grasp of materials (including materials and data) requires the author to carefully collect and review all materials, strive to ensure that valuable materials are not lost, and at the same time verify the reliability of materials; Make full use of reliable materials and delete materials that are unreliable or do not meet the scientific requirements, so as to achieve the purpose of eliminating the false and retaining the true. But as long as it is genuine, it cannot be discarded at will. Whether the result is positive or negative, positive or negative, success or failure, conformity or non-conformity, it should be truthfully reflected. Why not? Generalize by partiality? 、? Report good news but not bad news? . Especially when your own results are inconsistent with those reported in the literature. It is not easy for most scholars to do this. Like what? Biofacies scoring method? At first, the literature reports on fetal intrauterine conditions were highly reliable, but after the widespread application in clinic, many scholars found that this was not the case. However, it was not reported in the magazine. Although it is necessary to truthfully reflect different opinions, it requires not only courage, but also a lot of energy to carefully study and analyze the scientificity and reliability of your own data. Science always goes through practice? You know? Practice again? It can be developed through re-understanding. Then, according to the purpose of the study, we can analyze the materials from general to special and from special to general, but we should pay attention to the materials closely related to the article to make the results as clear as possible. General materials reflect the general situation, and special materials are related to the core part of the article; General materials are used to set off special materials, such as showing under what conditions special materials were obtained, so as long as this can be explained, the rest are omitted as far as possible. For example, in obstetric articles, general information includes: age, number of pregnancies, mode of production, neonatal situation,? Sampling? Time, about past history, etc. Often it doesn't take a lot of space to refine the problem. For special information, it is often necessary to list all kinds of situations that may affect the results, such as the results of a fetal heart monitoring, when to monitor and care for newborns; Perinatal results should include fetal distress, fetal heart changes and amniotic fluid characteristics; Apgar score of newborn (1 min and 5 min), neonatal prevalence rate, etc. Otherwise, people can't judge the reliability of the results or make the results stay at the level of repeating previous studies. The process of analysis is the process of using all your knowledge and wisdom, repeatedly scrutinizing and comprehensively measuring the data. Prospective research is easier to analyze because of its rigorous design and simple variation factors. However, retrospective research has complex influencing factors and often requires a lot of energy to analyze. At first glance, the conclusions that can be drawn must be deeply analyzed to see if they are impeccable and explore their inherent regularity. Be more patient with the materials that can't be concluded at first, and don't be afraid to rework and review the materials many times, and analyze and study them from different angles. When encountering statistical problems, you can learn a lot from experts who are familiar with statistics with an open mind. When drawing a conclusion, it is often necessary to check whether the results are reliable, reasonable and valuable, and compare them with similar research results at home and abroad to see whether the basic conclusions are the same or not, and whether there are new contents and discoveries. If there are discrepancies, it is often necessary to re-examine and check the reliability of materials, carefully compare their own materials with those at home and abroad, and check the reasons for the differences. Only after careful analysis can we make the conclusion reasonable, the arguments clear and the evidence reliable. In this way, not only is it much easier to write the result part, but also the discussion part is written naturally. Some papers submitted by authors are not published, which is often due to the lack of serious analysis and thinking on information and data, leading to some. The information does not match the subject; Some data have not been truly reflected; Some results are ambiguous, unable to explain the problem exactly, and even contradictory; Some statistical errors make the conclusion difficult to establish; Some of them are statistically significant, but the data are not credible because the project is not strict; Some results only stay at a low level of repetition, without any new ideas, and have no guiding significance for research and clinical work. If the summary of every research and clinical experience can be fully grasped and carefully analyzed, the results will be easy to write.