An excellent argument must be unique. The unique argument is not pretentious, but good at explaining it from the best angle of reasoning. It subtly uncovers the corner of the problem from the front, side or back, making people see the whole truth of the matter and giving readers the pleasure of seclusion and understanding things. For example:

A family that gave a hero to the society accepted compensation, which is an act of defilement and bravery. This "sublime theory" simulates the tone of God, who does not eat fireworks. Frankly speaking, I can only judge those who advocate such a "sublime theory" as follows:

One is an accomplice of gangsters. Aren't you brave? Then you will pay the price of your life, which will make your family life awkward. This is the price of being a hero. This can satirize heroic feats and vent personal anger at heroes.

The second is moral decay. They are the direct or indirect beneficiaries of being brave, but after they benefit, they just have no intention to bear a little moral responsibility to the victims.

Third, people who take the promotion of others' ideological realm as their profession. They need to prove the greatness of their profession with such "sublimity": they not only cultivate heroes who are brave in dedication, but also create unselfish survivors.

Smart and powerful

Excellent comments must be alert and powerful. The discussion of Jing Ke must not be sloppy and redundant; We must not be vague and far-fetched Every word of it should be forceful and thoughtful; Every word of it should be concise and full of artistic tension. Only in this way can the discussion be chewy and memorable. For example:

As long as it is not crazy and focused, no one wants instability and welcomes chaos. In fact, the landing of some official positions has not caused people's instability and social unrest. It needs to be dialectically analyzed that some people are tirelessly chanting "stability". They didn't plan ahead, tried their best to avoid problems, and didn't make up for it afterwards. Instead, they paraded through the city under the banner of "stability". The "stability" they want is not social stability, but the "stability" of some individual officials who commit corruption, bribery and dereliction of duty. This kind of "small stability" is based on not hesitating to deposit discontent, accumulate contradictions and sacrifice social "great stability", so it can only protect corruption.

Vivid image

An excellent argument must be vivid. It refuses to echo the platitudes of others' views and emphasizes the vivid display of ideas. Although the discussion should conquer readers and listeners with its powerful logical power, it does not rule out vivid images. Novel and lively argumentative writing can not only be beautiful and reasonable in quality, but also exert logical power to a greater extent. For example:

Kangxi can die, the Qing Dynasty can die, and the feudal system can be overthrown. However, China people's slave consciousness and imperial power thought have always been "alive" in a different way, sprouting in the spirit of China people all the time. Although after ideological emancipation and the washing of the democratic system, feudal emperors climbed out of the ancient tombs one by one with the attitude of historical heroes, and the braids of the Qing Dynasty became longer and longer. China literati's excavation of classical culture is actually the excavation of zombies of feudal emperors.

Cautious dialectics

An excellent argument must be meticulous and dialectical. It needs a mind with dialectical thinking, and can't argue irrationally because it highlights its own correctness, and can't be extreme because it emphasizes its importance. Serious and dialectical discussion will certainly make a comprehensive observation, objective analysis and fair judgment on things, and will certainly notice the differences between the objects and grasp the discretion of speech. For example:

Administrative law enforcement should be a national chess game, which truly embodies the basic principle of "everyone is equal before the law". Now even law enforcement can be divided into "home" and "away". Some people even take the "home and away" theory as the "guiding ideology" of law enforcement, turn a blind eye to local illegal phenomena, look on coldly at people and cars entering the local territory, and even ask for money is outrageous. This strange phenomenon of fragmented sand is a typical portrayal of the remnants of feudal separatism, full of out-and-out egoism. To some extent, the disorder of market economy order is related to the disorder of law enforcement order. Therefore, to fundamentally rectify the market economic order, we must first thoroughly rectify the administrative law enforcement order.

Humorous and clever

An excellent argument must be witty, clever and full of wisdom. If you lose your wisdom, you will fall into rigidity. In fact, many correct nonsense and reasonable empty words are piled up under boring thinking, and excellent arguments refuse to be boring and praise humor and intelligence. It makes people realize a certain truth, and at the same time appreciates the humor of a carefree mind. For example:

We all know that knowledge is power. Besides, there is a saying in real life that "beauty is also a kind of power", or "beauty is power". In some people's eyes, knowledge is not so important. They eat by beauty, or by beauty. They believe that "beauty is a kind of power", namely wealth and happiness. Many people have joined the ranks of "beauty molecules". When a society values beauty over knowledge, or values beauty over knowledge, it deserves vigilance and reflection.